/lit/ - Literature

Who was better?

Which of science fiction's "big three" do you prefer?
Why?

>>8489716

I'd say he and Clarke are about the same: technocrats with the added addendum that all women (or in Clarke's case, little boys) must be available for unquestioning sexual relations with persons named Robert A. Heinlein or Arthur C. Clarke.

Asimov had the same technocratic leanings but without the overt sexual desperation--one presumes he got laid on occasion.

In other words, they had the political sensibilities of the average /lit/izen: a ridiculous sense of their mental superiority over objectively superior males.

>they were obvious betas like us except they could write (more or less) and were in the right era to succeed at it