/lit/ - Literature

How does one stay constantly on their guard against the microfascisms of everyday life?

>the repetition of difference is the difference that constitutes difference in difference something something capitalistic schizophrenia
Am I interpreting him correctly?

How does one stay constantly on their guard against the microfascisms of everyday life?

>>18585891
RHIZOMES
RHIZOMES
RHIZOMES
RHIZOMES
RHIZOMES

Is he a crypto-Buddhist?

Did Deleuze get anything right?

>>17597635
Because Hegel is garbage.

>Was not one of the most important points of Jung’s theory already to be found here: the force of ‘questioning’ in the unconscious, the conception of the unconscious as an unconscious of ‘problems’ and ‘tasks’? Drawing out the consequences of this led Jung to the discovery of a process of differenciation more profound than the resulting oppositions.
Was he right?

Is there any fiction that could be described as "Deleuzian"?

>removed everything good from Nietzsche and created a bluepilled globohomo version of him
>fused him with 3 jews
>unironic Marxist despite being a """Nietzschean"""
>gay
>is the patron saint of trannies
>created accelerationism
>was a pedo
>thought that not cutting your dick off was fascism
>killed himself
Cringe. Literally the worst philosopher

I wanted to start with "Nietzsche and Philosophy" but I can't find a good epub for the life of me. Any suggestions for other good places to start with Deleuze? Thanks bros...

>A leftist government doesn't exist because being on the left has nothing to do with governments
What did Deleuze mean by this?

What is this guy talking about mate?

>dude, all languages are equal and can explain all concepts equally well
>but I need to introduce convoluted and vague terminology in order to explain my super duper deep philosophy
Why are they like this? (Pic only partially related tbf)

>book is 500 pages long
>It has no paragraphs

How do we prevent the state from becoming a tool of capitalism?

He seems cool, other than Anti-Oedipus and A Thousand Plateaus what are some more mind fucks by him?

>Beneath the scintillating stylistic facade of a "rhizomatic" prose, Deleuze tirelessly and monotonously underscores the same essential point again and again: Everything exists on one ontological level alone; everything is to be situated on a single "plane of immanence": therefore, the temptation to posit split tiers of existence (such as Plato's division between the visible and intelligible realms and Kant's noumenal-phenomenal opposition) must be resisted.

can somebody explain to me what virtuality means

I'm not really big on Marxism or psychoanalysis but his ideas sound kind of interesting from a surface level perspective
Is he actually worth a read or is delving deeper not all that rewarding?

Are any of these post-structuralist French chucklefucks actually worth reading? Just in doing a brief overview of them it seems like all they were doing was taking the thought of German philosophers (especially Nietzsche) and applying it to specific aspects of society.

>>16003711
Premodern=Postmodern
Monism=Pluralism
Monad=Dyad

>>15748667
Yeah, a lot of the French Marxists came to this conclusion as they progressed into Neo-Marxists and saw the teleology of Marxist Theory.
No wonder so many of them became depressed late in life.

>Gilles Deleuze was a French philosopher who, from the early 1950s until his death in 1995, wrote on philosophy, literature, film, and fine art.
>His most popular works were the two volumes of Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Anti-Oedipus (1972)

Dude sounds like the most generic pop philosopher ever lmao. Why is he still given any attention?