/lit/ - Literature

>>23119364
maybe they should start taking lessons from the fascists instead of willingly letting a soft bolshevik state isolate and decimate them like cucks. but that would threaten their paycheck, couldn't possibly risk it.

>>19234017
everytime there's a thread on /lit/ about fascism and some anon is sperging out defending mussolini and claiming he is true revolutionary who *really* understood marx, it's me.

i dropped out of college for this shit and it's the only thing i spend my time doing.

>>19074431
Yes.

>>18965350
beating up your enemies is based. it's never not been based. violence is a question and the answer is always yes.

>>18770961
i didn't call hitler a socialist, or a fascist. i prefer your own description of him "liberal on crack"
(hitler also called himself a liberal btw)
but in genealogy there is no relationship between hitler's national socialism and mussolini's fascism.
there's no such thing as statism, by the way. it's an abstraction. do you know what states are? individuals. when you say you "oppose the state" what you're really saying is that you oppose a certain kind of organization of people- and so you must respond to them in the only proper way. violence.