/lit/ - Literature

>>4937565
I'd hope they just disseminate and their idiocy would subside somewhat.

If they ever came here I'd strongly hope we would vehemently revolt against it.

Can you ban people for being illogical, delusional, inflammatory idiots on /lit/? I would seriously hope so. It's not technically trolling, cause, God help us, some of them actually believe the shit they spew, but they look identical.

I'd banhammer them into oblivion if I could.

>>4937559
This, this, this, this. Despite all the diverse, particular minutiae which the idiots on /pol/ pretend to deal in, all the important political discussions they think they hold right in, ultimately the matter is very simple, very black and white. There is no middle ground, no compromise. There can be no compromise with /pol/. They are simply fucking S-T-U-P-I-D and are in dire need of self-awareness and education.

Sorry if that no-compromise stuff waxes too extreme (in the very way I am opposing) but it's how I feel when it comes to pure delusional idiocy like /pol/.

At least /x/ has restrain, awareness of what they delve in. I like /x/ for its creativity, and for not actually telling us that Slenderman and the like are real, because they know that'd be insane. /pol/ thinks Slenderman's about to take all your guns, your wives, your money, your freedoms, and then kill you while you sleep. It's insanity. Apparently it uses to be more like /x/, as in the unspoken satirical sense, but apparently that's turned to real, undeniable idiocy over the years as they've attracted the morons who weren't in on the joke.

I'm not sure who this quotation actually belongs to, whether it be Descartes or Voltaire or someone else, or even if it's a factual historical quotation, but it's still relevant here.