/lit/ - Literature

>>11297842
You would also like
Eric Hobsbawm
Richard Wolff
David Harvey
Emma Goldman
Voltairine de Clerye

>>11297891
The red pills they're feeding you are the juicy steaks. IE the blue pill

>>10684028
Hobsbawm books are nice. He's like a more enthusiastic Braudel

https://historyofphilosophy.net/ podcasts is where I got my philosophic background from
People around here love/hate Russell's History of Philosophy.

Bumping for you

>>9442794
The anon above has it right. The moneyed elites run things (poorly. It's just a cash grab, a drive-by) Again, the Stone/Kuznick book and the Hobsbawm books give a good rundown of the revolutionary period

>>7285874
First you have to understand how the novel has come to its current state.
Oh it would probably help for you to not worry so much about "race" and the spook that "white" people will somehow not exist in an already doubtful future, Mr. Polbait

>>7149757
>and the days leading up to it.
Half serious, half just bumping for you.
Age of Revolution was great, and even thought it's time frame stops at 1848, I could feel the buildup to all that come next. Age of Capital and Age of Empire should also be good.

>>6954276
Why wouldn't it be?

>>6955282
I'll fight with you.

>>6910316
Currently reading Hobsbawm's Age of Revolution. You could get started on that

>>6910361
>OP, philosophy is the most important thing not taught in schools
Naw.
But if you're interested, start with Epicurus
historyofphilosophy.net/