/lit/ - Literature

You!

You''re the Greatest Soothsayer, my imaginary green lad - who hopefully doesn't ask 'Y' - but only when you: attempt to remove yourself even further from what everyone has said by reporting the essentials of what they said; assess everybody else and what little of you remains, for you have assessed that you're ceasing to exist little by little; apply all of the ethics/aesthetics/metaphysics you've observed from your subjects, both living and dead and how they would utilize their ics in the situations of X, Y and Z: you may now proceed by finding humanity either as comical or as a tragedy or a combination of both in those three incorrect perception models.

Either of the three works. But please don't pleb around and say: your muse in writing a comedy is funny; or your muse in writing a tragedy is sad; or your muse in writing a tragicomedy is truly bitter-sweet.

Because it's far easier: to write a comedy, when you're depressed; and it's far easier to write a tragedy, when you're - whatever the opposite of depressed is.

This is probably true because I am retarded and logic that the creative depressed usually wants to overcome that depression by writing everything that makes that person depressed in the opposite light of how that persons perceives situations.

I may say: this doesn't make any fucking sense because the creative depressed obviously want to have more intrusive thoughts of how they perceive the world.

For the writers of Tragedy: they're just feelers that feel for those that have feels or when other feelers feel they can limit other feelers and 'non-feelers' feels or the 'non-feeler' feeling all feels . . . and those are the tragedies.

There's an Ultimate writer, but you who are the greatest will learn: YFW YAM of whom it is to be said - will perfect your Lantern; the one that will provide you a new masturbating technique(s) for your Opus X No. 2. . .

Because Opus X, NO. 1 was already written, so a rewrite is necessary in using a different tech