/lit/ - Literature

>>6010114
Again, there are many authors and you should only care about the original literary critic guys, maybe some Foucault, but ignore what people say about post-modernist narratives since it's a silly term to sell more. There is no particular post-modernist writing style besides acknowledging post-modernist ideas while writing. Being self referential or having the character fight his own doubts is older than pomo and at best should be considered tangentially related. Like Tarzan as a modernist tale, it sort of is but it doesn't even matter that much.

>new era
>60 years ago
>no longer a big tendency
3D printing is marking its way and it could end up with cool stuff. People still do every single style invented somewhere in the world, though, it's not a hive mind.

>>5953005
Installations are undoubtely the main focus of galleries and museums since a couple of deaces ago, even though the general idea started in the 60's. It still has some space to evolve, which is cool. At least I feel that way seeing how things like giving new uses to set spaces and different screens are still opening new ways if you compare it with Nauman or any oldfag.

still, it's a bit tied to new technology and many times it ends up looking more like an add than a piece of art. I really like people like Jim campbell who make their own shit.

>>5953008
>look at me im art
I really don't get what you're trying to say. Are you complaining about happenings?

>>5683938
Read.

Honestly, from what I read it seems more like a children's book that a young adult story. I'd say that if it gets published, kids are going be the main audience. If you ever look for an agent, considere looking for one that works with children's books.

The second paragraph has to many "it didn't", it could be good idea to rephrase them to make the lecture smoother.

And there's a type in the last paragraph you send me, maybe "chaiave" was actually "achieve"?

>>5658905
It seems that way because I'm the only one you speak to, VTP. But tranny and faggot aren't the same.

There are a few wrong parts in the base thesis and the conclusion has no real conection with it.
The apreciation of prose, camera work, brush use or other technical aspects is exactly how you break away from the homogeneity. The twitter may mean that the attentions is shifted to those aspects to distract from a wider homogeneity, but in that case it should explain what are the "true" values to get since at the end it goes back to those technical aspects and maybe incorporates historical context which has been part of literary analysis since the pre structuralists.

The film analysis is the kind of thing you read in first year of film school, a take so shallow on the language of the medium that shows no real interest to that point in understanding it.

Pretty decent bate.

>>5646105
I was really expecting someone to tell me >Foucault or something and having a small discussion about he is quite an easy to understand writer when compared with his contemporaries, so thanks!

>>5631370
You can:
>underline sentences that impact you
>separate the components of a complex structure
>write questions to check later
>remind yourself of where a certain part starts (for example, I really like one of Junger's descriptions of a chlorine attack so I added a small mark at the start and another at the end)
>anotate data that will become more important later (people do it with Pychon a lot)
Or pretty much anything you want, you'll be the only one chekcing it.

I prepare a banquet and take a place as designated alpha slut, duh. It's as if you didn't know how to live outside of the most controlling society.

>>5467766
I don't see why you shouldn't. But you'll notice that the definition of young varies a lot as you get older.
Also, if you find value in things besides being fuckable you'll have more reasons to keep living!