[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.8889963 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8889963

>>8888234
Welcome to...

>> No.8638727 [View]
File: 110 KB, 470x662, IMG_2273.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8638727

Just started reading this. Thoughts?

>> No.8241465 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8241465

Why is most science fiction written by doddering old men that hate progress?

>> No.7883730 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7883730

What does /lit/ think of Jurassic Park?

Is the lost world worth reading?

>> No.7797741 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7797741

is it just me or is there a dearth of hard science fiction (as opposed to science fantasy) that is based around biology and biological concepts (as opposed to astronomy/physics/computer science)? Sure, there are plenty of biological aliens but these works are usually more science fantasy rather than "speculative fiction" (not trying to be pretentious here, just trying to make a distinction).

pic related is pretty much all i can think of at the moment.

>> No.7091762 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7091762

The >genre fiction meme aside, is this worth reading? And recommend more dinosaur books.

>> No.7067395 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7067395

So did you like this or the movie better? Neither were that special or anything just wanted to know everyone's opinions

>inb4 >movies

>> No.6724233 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6724233

Howdy, /lit/. I was wanting to finally get around to reading Jurassic park.

However, there seems to be a lot of different versions of it. I was wondering which version you recommend the most.

I'm a hardcover man. I like the way they look a lot more than paperback, so I'm only interested in hardcover.
On amazon they have the hardcover as orange, but I can't seem to find any pictures of an orange JP book.

Or, should I just get the Jurassic park and lost world 2-in-1? It's a bit pricier, but I like the way it looks. The only thing I'm apprehensive about it is I hear Lost world isn't that good. I'd hate to pay more just for a prettier cover and another story I wouldn't want/wouldn't like.

>> No.5978746 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5978746

When the movie is actually better than the book.

>> No.5940652 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5940652

>Jurassic Park
>most of the dinosaurs are clearly from the Cretaceous period

>> No.5357768 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5357768

Fight me /lit/

>> No.5341979 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5341979

I love the film adaption, is the book worth it? I heard it's the exact same thing as the film, but still, what is your opinion on it, /lit/?

>> No.5306295 [View]
File: 105 KB, 470x662, Jurassicpark.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5306295

Finally got around to read the book since I love the movie.

I thought it was great and wanted to know what /lit/ thinks about it.
>also michael crichton thread

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]