/lit/ - Literature

>>22086734
>Justify this philosophically.
I actually cannot, the terms and conditions of signing up for an online broker are pretty sketchy. Sure, you can make money, but they farm your data, front run your trades, can close your account for any reason, report to the IRS automatically, etc. Being a capitalist ain't all it's cracked up to be. XMR is better.

>>22086733
>Democracy is basically a joke
Yeah. I've been toying with the idea of writing up my thoughts on why democracy is shit but it's been done so many times I'm worried it'll come off as repetitive. One such issue is the culpability electorates (voters specifically) have for electing corruptible people to rule over them. By all rights the USA should have descended into outright wild west anarchy a million times by now.

>>22086731
>The only other alternative is to say that theoretically infinite returns are justifiable.
They are justifiable, based on property rights. Read Locke and open your eyes. (Also the "Bezos clan" isn't going to be the sole owners of Amazon for eternity. Do you even know what a publicly traded company is?)
>The workers have to be utter idiots to fall for this
Awesome, I can mark "typical communist disdain for the working class" off my bingo card.