/lit/ - Literature

>>23188193
not that anon, but I had shitload of math at the university AND haven't read the book AND don't know what the santa fe institute is AND still think that mcsharty is gay and bad at math anyway
>verification not required

>>23048067
then why don't you do a girl?

Take Game of Thrones for example (excluding the final seasons); that shit stunk in book form that is from manbaby who has never fucked; the tv series was filled with hot babes and it had a good production and great acting/production/direction etc.

I would even go as far as to say that even something like Tolkien isn't horribly better as a book because its filled with descriptions that are too technical; yeah technical descriptions are not bad in a book but they explicitly replace cinematography or even audio sometimes; it would be like having the delusion music or image can be totally be replaced by words at least in a fast way lol..