/lit/ - Literature

>>20289536
Women rate 80% of men as "below average" and over 50% of men as unfuckable monstrosities when allowed to rate freely

Men rate women on a perfect curve

philosophically speaking, is it possible to refute the following reasoning from an incel forum intended as a refutation of "you're not entitled to a satisfactory sex life"
>1. Nobody is entitled to anything

>Entitlements are a figment of imagination, they exist only in the minds of humans, and function only within societies where they are allowed to function, and are facilitated (usually through tax collection to fund said "entitlement programmes")

>Pension, welfare, clean water, education, nobody is really entitled to any of it if were being objective and honest.

>2. Incels don't feel entitled to sex, they simply WANT sex

>I keep seeing the "entitlement" argument repeated everywhere and it is literally just a strawman argument, propping up a stance so absurd that you can't help but be right being against it, heck even I agree with being against it, because its egotistical and illogical for anyone to think they literally DESERVE anything, a normies reasoning for being against it would likely be more emotionally based though, more like - "women are people too, this is so misogynistic, its so hurtful, etc, etc".

>Are there a few incels actually going around saying and believing that they "deserve" sex and are entitled to it, yes, but those men are idiots, they are outliers, any logical person knows full well nobody "deserves" anything. Most incels adhere to the "black pill philosophy", and a key "tenant" of that is basing ones life choices and interpretation of observations, on cold hard logic, so I doubt most incels (or even 5% of incels) actually believe they DESERVE sex

>Incels simply just want, just like every other human on this planet that wants, to try and paint incels as this collective of egotistical males, that all think they are entitled to sex (women's bodies) is a falsehood that is often peddled by the media and society at large.

>You see because its much easier to simply create a false narrative that can be argued against, than to argue against the actual thing. Paint incels as malicious and egotistical instead of frustrated and suicidal, and its much easier to demonize incels and garner support against them.

>>12641801

>>12343896
>How have you not picked up on the fact that looks are significantly less important for women than men?

Not him, but I haven't picked up on that because it's not true.