/lit/ - Literature

>>14290721
No; in that instance, Jesus was speaking in a vulgar manner so that his "point" could be, at the very least, vaguely understood by most of the rest of his disciples, who were enthopatriarchally prejudiced and/or ignorant of Mary Magdalene; Jesus meant that he would help Mary Magdalene bring herself closer to unity with her Animus, with all of the optimization in lifestyle that that entails, thus enabling her to become perfect in her true androgynous self; in the understanding of most of the disciples, Jesus meant that he would discipline Mary Magdalene against the vices that you listed - which she was actually void of - a developed characteristic which was/is commonly associated with patriarchal upringing.

Mary Magdalene was one of the few actual Christians amongst Jesus' disciples, the others being: John, Thomas, and Judas Iscariot.

>>14290721
No; in that instance, Jesus was speaking in a vulgar manner so that his "point"could be, at the very least, vaguely understood by most of the rest of his disciples who were enthopatriarchally prejudiced and/or ignorant of Mary Magdelene; Jesus meant that he would help Mary Magdelene bring herself closer to unity with her Animus, with all of the optimization in lifestyle that that entails, thus enabling her to become perfect in her true androgynous self; in the understanding of most of the disciples, Jesus meant that he would discipline Mary Magdalene against the vices that you listed - which she was actually void of - a developed characteristic which was/is commonly associated with patriarchal upringing.

Mary Magdelene was one of the few actual Christians amongst Jesus' disciples, the others being: John, Thomas, and Judas Iscariot.