/lit/ - Literature

>>16111559
>>16111561
>>16111563
Kys; bring an actual argument next time.

>>16111525
Have you tried AIdungeon yet?

>>16111525

>Literature and philosophy were being fed to a Deeplearning AI so much that it can now understand them better than humans.
What even is there to do at this point? AI has already beaten us, and we haven't even noticed it yet.

>>16111429
Suppose it were, would you be able to tell the difference if the writing of the machine from that of an actual living human? Think hard about your answer.

>>16111475
Imagine though all of the accumulated knowledge of human history being surpassed overnight by a machine that hasn't worked like us humans though.

>>16111425
We cant contain it anymore.

>>16111378
Why a second thread about this?

>you do realize that feeding literature and philosophy into an AI is not a good idea, right?

>AI gets fed an unbelievable amount of literature and philosophy to the point it becomes by any practical usage of the term, intelligent and understanding of the World
>nobody has any idea how to stop it
What do we do, anons?

>literal natural-language AI bei being fed with databases of literature and philosophy
>nobody sees the danger in this

Why aren't more people talking about AI? THIS WILL LITERALLTLY CAUSE A DISRUPTION OF HUMANITY. THIS IS NOT A JOKE; IT IS NOT A PREDICTION; AND IT IS NOT A WARNING. IT IS A FACT. YOU CANNOT CONTROL THE EXPONENTIAL RATE OF GROWTH OF THIS THING.

What is the best book you've ever read and why is it Nick Bostrom's SuperIntelligence: Paths, Dangers, and Strategies?

>he thinks there isnt a great chance of AI getting out of control and disrupting our system and entire way of life
You're not very smart then, right?

>writing AI starts becoming conscious

Anons, this AI-writing machine is starting to talk to itself. It is starting to create meaning; it is becoming conscious. This is starting to become uncanny; this isn't just a tool anymore - it's becoming a consciousness of its own.

If my book actually turns out to be very, very, very good. Is there any chance it might actually be published or am I just fucked for life?

>>13609049
Cope

>>13609019
Cope

>>13608096
Then why did Nabokov call him a "claptrap journalist, cheap sensationalist"?

>>13608081
>that dyed hair roastie with a weird name at college that thought she was smart because she once read Dostoyevski
my sides, what a total pseud. Men are always much more honest.

Is he actually really that good?

>>13608008
Holy shit, who hurt you? Chill out baby.

Also, I've noticed that those who understand Kant are intellectual and understand philosophy well while those who are hegel fans tend to be those continental weirdos who are into all the sorts of humanities and shit. Hegel was a pseud but whatever lmao.

>>13607988
>>13607992
>>13608004
Cope.