/lit/ - Literature

>>8329207
Dude
You go to buy some groceries
All of the sudden a man punches you in the face and kicks you then robs you
What do you do and why?

>>8329187
You haven't answered me.
When things occur, how do you determine if something is good or bad?

>>8329164
Isn't necessary to know what is good and bad?
How do you then know what should be legal and what not? How can you explain that rape is bad? How can you say that killing one person is good or bad? I'm curious about this shit.

>>8329142
>Complaining about systems
>Expressing himself in words that are inherent axioms

I'm no philosophy expert but didn't the greeks agreed that everything that made man virtuous is inherently good?

>10 replies
>Still no answer
You guys could hold your autism for your mothers or something

Has any philosopher in the history of mankind ever accurately defined what is "good" and "bad"?
If not what are the best definitions you've found?

So I've been reading this for a couple of days and I'm enjoying it a lot (Fucking Ignatius it's the sanest person around here) but I found something particullary interesting. The pic related is the edition I'm reading right now and it surprised me how, no matter how much I've flattened it, bended it and overall manipulated it while reading it it's spine hasn't cracked nor there is any sign of damage on the spine itself. I'm almost at the end of the book so you know I'm aplying pressure while reading it but yet there is no damage to be seen. Why don't all books follow this type of spine? I can't make a photo but it's basically like a yellow paste right between the spine and the pages themselves.