/lit/ - Literature

>>14471307
You're still mad you got eternally btfo?

>>14471301
Delete this post, reformat the question so that it is comprehensible, then post it again.

>>14471238
>>14471232
My diary desu

>>14471235
>>14471218
>>14471245

Yes, its extremely cringe. read all three critiques, then difference and repetition, then fanged noumena, then zizek, then terence mckenna

>>14471124
>>14471109
>>14471103
>>14471090
>>14471089
>>14471073
>>14471059
>>14471053
>>14471049
>>14471045
>>14471043
>>14471036
"One time, and it was just that one time, when the earth come to a close, and the universe grinds to a halt, for every human, who has ever lived, living their lives, in despair, grasping, ni"

>>14470978
hungry catterpillar

>>14470985
Ok, twenty words, here we go:

Niiga poo poo wow twitch discord wooo yea whos to say that tentapoon isnt healthy dude wooooo

>>14468327
no, he adresses this indirectly when he talks about ascetic ideals in geneaology of morality and beoyong good and evil

>>14468340
explain the transcendental deduction of the pure apprehension of judgement. you have 3 minutes

>>14468329
Did I say that? No. It is possible to recognize that there are groups of people that contribute to society in valuable ways, but that the individuals who make up said group have sub-par personalities.

>>14468292
>>14468287
>>14468275
>>14468273
>>14468266
>>14468255
INCEL ahahhahahahah

>>14468307
>>14468288
>>14468228
read ALL THREE CRITIQUES

>>14468295
>>14468313
>>14468293
this is true. being a "man" is not an achievement though. its the bare minimum to be considered a normal human being

>>14468236
read ALL THREE CRITIQUES, then DIFFERENCE AND REPETITION.

>>14468278
engineers are usually not that literary people, or good people for that matter

>>14468206
Iran should not be an Islamic nation. Why do all the intelligent persians move to america/france/germany?

>>14468144
>All art is the manifestation of consciousness

Everything is a manifestation of consciousness if you want to be pedantic.

>The best art, is that which most closely captures what it is in the mind.

Everything "captures" what is in the mind. Maybe you mean "conveys what is in one mind to another mind" or something of the like

>So when it comes to the subject on what is fine, what is beauty. It is simply personal, that is all.

I agree that it is personal. You havent proved that here though. That art must be beautiful does not follow from it having to "reflect consciousness" whatever that means.

>The more souls your art speaks to, the more beautiful it is.

This does not follow either

>It's why certain stories and epics have lived so long, because they are universal.

How long a story lasts in a culture depends on a lot more than whether it is beautiful or now. Beauty isnt what I would ascribe to most stories even. Germanic fables are very old, but they are grotesque. They clearly have pedagogical use, but I don't think they have much aesthetic value for most of its readers/listeners, for most of history.

>fuck post-modernism btw

Why? This isnt relevant to what you said. Read deleuze or Baudrillard

>>14468142
I agree with the examples you've given, but the fact that booktubers is what you bring up shows that you don't go outside much. I know tons of people who read, and are able to talk about it without being pretentious. If you go to a university and join a book club there, you're bound to find at least a couple of intelligent people who genuinely love literature.

>>14468139
i agree

>>14468151
lmao

>>14468062
based

>>14468045
>british essayist

noone cares. whats one good thing britain has ever produced? land is based, he moved to china lmao.

>>14467963
Yea, I never mentioned pleasure in my post. Stirners criticism goes so deep that it becomes useless. My point is that "altruism" has a meaning when its used, and that deconstructing it the way egoists do is doesnt do anything. A buddhist munk that sets himself on fire and kills himself is doing to for reasons that can be construed as selfish. Doesn't matter, when people say selfish/altruistic that isnt what they're talking about. All moral philosophy can be done on top of descriptive egoism.

>>14467993
yes