/lit/ - Literature

>>2607252

THERE IS NO "POINT" TO YOUR STATEMENT, WHICH IS SIMPLISTIC, THEREFORE UNACCURATE.

>>2607222
>>2607240

YOU ARE BOTH UNACCURATE*.

THERE IS A "MASS POLARIZATION" BETWEEN "SINCERITY", AND "IRONY".


▬▬▬
* THE WORD "UNACCURATE" IS AN ALTERNATIVE SPELLING OF "INACCURATE", IT IS CONSIDERED "OBSOLETE". I PREFER "UNACCURATE" OVER "INACCURATE".

>/lit/
>ELITIST.

I AM AN HETEROSEXUAL MALE, AND I ENJOYED "THE BELL JAR".

AN EIGHT POINT FIVE OUT OF TEN, ACCORDING TO ME.

I THINK THAT GENDER IS IRRELEVANT TO BE ABLE TO COMPREHEND IT.

IF ONE HAS EXPERIENCED EVENTS & "PSYCHOLOGICAL STATES" SIMILAR TO THE ONES EXPERIENCED BY SYLVIA PLATH, ONE CAN COMPREHEND "THE BELL JAR".

PERSONS ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY AGGRESSIVE TOWARDS OTHER PERSONS WITHOUT APPARENT REASON.

RELATIVELY SOON, IT WILL BE DANGEROUS TO BE OUTSIDE.

WHEN THE GOLDEN GIANT REACHES THE PROXIMITY OF EARTH,

AND THE SKIES TURN RED,

NEGROES WILL BE THE FIRST RACE TO TURN BERSERK.

PERSONS ARE BECOMING INCREASINGLY AGGRESSIVE TOWARDS OTHER PERSONS WITHOUT APPARENT REASON.

RELATIVELY SOON, IT WILL BE DANGEROUS TO BE OUTSIDE.

WHEN THE GOLDEN GIANT REACHES THE PROXIMITY OF EARTH,

AND THE SKIES TURN RED,

NEGROES WILL BE THE FIRST RACE TO TURN BERSERK.

COMMITT SUICEDE.

HELLO.

I WANT TO KNOW SOMETHING:

HOW DO PERSONS WHO WRITE ARTICLES; "JOURNALISTS", KNOW SPECIFIC DETAILS OF EVENTS IN THE LIFE OF A PERSON, WHEN APPARENTLY, NOONE COULD HAVE WITNESSED, OR KNOWN ABOUT THAT SPECIFIC DETAIL?

e.g. I READ IN AN ARTICLE THAT JEROME DAVID SALINGER CARRIED WITH HIM THE "MANUSCRIPTS"/"DRAFTS" OF HIS "HOLDEN CAULFIELD STORIES", WHEN HE LANDED ON EUROPE ON "D DAY".

HOW DID THE "JOURNALIST", OR ANYONE KNEW THAT?

>What do you think of astrology?

I THINK THAT IT ONCE WAS A SCIENCE.

NOW, MILLENIA LATER, IT HAS OVERLY DEGENERATED.

>Does it apply to your life?

YES.

>THAT FEELING AND SUBSEQUENT SENSATION WHEN ONE'S FATHER USED TO THINK THAT ONE WAS HOMOSEXUAL WHEN ONE WAS TWELVE YEARS OF AGE UNTIL ONE WAS FOURTEEN YEARS OF AGE.

>>2601909

I PREFER "NOTHING".

NOT WORKING AT A DEPRESSING NOPLACE LIKE A "FASTFOOD ESTABLISHMENT" DOES NOT ENTAIL "WELFARE".

>>2601466

NICE FALLACIOUS "ARISTOTELEAN" LOGIC.

THAT IS ONE OF MY "PERSONAL QUOTES".

BELIEVE IT, OR NOT.

I CREATED IT IN THE YEAR TWOTHOUSAND NINE, WHEN I WAS STILL A RELATIVELY NAÏVE TEENAGER.

>>2595969
>I'm going in for surgery next Wednesday and I'll be off work for recovery for the next three weeks.

I ONLY LISTEN TO THESE:

***COMPOSERS***

GUSTAV MAHLER.

RICHARD WAGNER.

JOHANN SEBASTIAN BACH.


***BANDS***

"MODERN WITCH".

"CRYSTAL CASTLES".

"AUSTRA".

"JOY DIVISION".

"YOUNG MARBLE GIANTS".

erikstinson.tumblr.com/

"HILARIOUS"?

YEP, SO FUNNY & IRONIC XDDD AM I RIGHT?

>>2594786

IT SEEMS AS IF YOU WERE "PROJECTING", WHICH GIVES THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU ARE UPSET, WHICH MAKES ME INFER THAT YOU ARE JUST A LIBERAL.

>>2594751

A PERSON'S "PERSONA" IS IRRELEVANT WHEN CONSIDERING THE FACTS.

MOST OF WHAT HE COVERS IN HIS "MANIFESTO" IS ACCURATE & FACTUAL.

>I got this paper from some chick who told me to take it home, re-write it on the computer, and print it out.

>>2594666

I DO NOT THINK SO.

WHY WOULD HE CALL HIMSELF A "CHRISTIAN" IF HE WAS NOT "RELIGIOUSLY" BIASED IN SOME DEGREE?

I DID NOT FINISH READING IT, AND I DO NOT THINK THAT I WILL FINISH READING IT SOON.

OVERALL, I AGREE WITH HIS PREMISE, BUT I DISAGREE WITH HIS "RELIGIOUS" BIAS.

OH, LOOK, ANOTHER THREAD ATTEMPTING DISCUSSING "MARX", IN THE YEAR TWOTHOUSAND TWELVE.