/lit/ - Literature

1. I have.

2. I can't read.

also :

>>1543762
>>1543767

Take it up with Pascal. It isn't my belief, so I'm not wasting my time defending/explaining it.

>>1543759

True, but on the same lines as the original post. Worded better, too.

I prefer holding a real book, but reading an ebook.

Pascal's Wager

>even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, a person should wager as though God exists, because living life accordingly has everything to gain, and nothing to lose.

Creepy tits. Chicks with no areola kind of scare me.

I honestly liked it, too. It was honestly a lot of fun to read.

Imagine the main character as Michael Cera. Trust me.

>>1543508

not you... this anon -

>>1543501

>>1543501

are you saying you have a story based on "HERMIONE GRANGER AND THE CHAMBER OF SADOMASOCHISM"?

>>1543441

> Don't want to burst your bubble and honestly - keep writing, but /lit/ does not want to read amateur writing. Keep it to yourself or be prepared for self-insulated neckbeards shitting over your stuff to feel better.

deal w/it

Because it's the only thing that sets him apart.

>>1543204

you will never be a great troll.

ever

>>1542657

You'd be even better for picking up an intro to psychology book.

Lazy, perhaps... but irresponsible? That's a bit far, ain't it?

I mean named or no, some people are just assholes that'll regurgitate memes and argue with themselves.

By throwing a name up there, I'm making anon look worse separating their posts from mine.

But why go through the effort of having a trip?