/lit/ - Literature

>>5620782

yeah, literally every e-reader owner that i know

He got buttblasted by Stalin once.

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2014/04/h-g-wells-it-seems-me-i-am-more-left-you-mr-stalin

http://www.amazon.com/Hold-Dark-Novel-William-Giraldi/product-reviews/0871406675/ref=cm_cr_dp_qt_hist_one?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addOneStar&showViewpoints=0

L O L
O
L

this guy

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/21/compliments-are-nice-but-enough-with-the-cormac-mccarthy-comparisons.html?via=mobile&source=twitter

>>5618538

this

>>5611893

the sculpture is of a guy *unable* to suck himself off, fwiw.

If you like art that can only possibly make you go 'Yes, dragon', it's your taste and that's okay, but I wouldn't enjoy your company.

>>5610391

No one owes you any attention.

>>5610218

is this bait bait?

>not rekt

>>5591649

post structuralism is not an agenda of how things should be, it's a framework of ideas with which you can analyse how things are. please reread your first post.

>>5591101

except the question is 'what is?' and not 'what should be?'.

>>5590505

>not high literature
yeah, I guess.

>or art.
don't be that guy.

>>5575493

I can't stop imagining your face collapse

If you speak french a very good place to start is Franck Chaumon's 'Lacan, la loi, le sujet et la jouissance'.

>>5570503

based perec.


also there is a kind of old turkish poetry called 'lips-don't-touch' where you don't use the letters b, p and m; which i think is pretty cool.

mira gonzalez is my litfu

>>5563007
>Transförmer

top kek

>>5562607

patrish

>>5562197

Yep. It's called paradoxes.

>>5562284

:')

>>5562274

Young Adult literature is exploitative of young girls more than anyone else.

The author, out of sheer contrarianism, it appears; takes it upon herself to defend the genre, so the logical next step is to defend it via the very demographic it exploits.

Which is the kind of circular reasoning that delegitimizes multiculturalism.

>Young adult literature has long been the refuge of those on the outer edges of the societal zeitgeist. Women have legitimacy within its realm, seeing successes not often available to them on the mainstream market.

Wow

Who decides that an existent being is 'greater' than a non-existent being?

>>5561913

Yeah, you're right. (Though I'd maybe start it in the 50s as that's when the muslim brotherhood was conceived.)

But my point is that however you think the shift to fundamentalism happened (and I'm actually very cynical about it), it's no coincidence; the foundations for it were already there in the religion.