/lit/ - Literature

>>3322606
>Just a friendly reminder the Marxism has been a joke to most intelligent people for at least a few decades.


this x 1000

>>3319594
>Instead, you deflect like a madman "not going to touch this"

you're

a) purposely needless agressive and resistant

b) still too dull to catch on to anything i let slip through the cracks without making you a drawing

>The clothing you buy and the cologne you wear are made in huge vats and disbursed to the masses


A) you really need to go learn so basic basics about fashion and fragrance

I mean, 'mass production and distribution = bad' fallacy aside, none of the work being discussed is either mass produced or mass distributed

This only shows how out of touch with the art forms you are, and what a miserable person you have to be to insult and argue about something you have absolutely no knowledge in

>>3319583

etat libre d'orange's work has much more depth than the work of commonly lauded writers here like pynchon and dfw

>>3319577
>2. lack of empathy -- toward what, perfume?

usually people with poor empathic capability at least have good reasoning skills

you're just dull and needlessly agressive

so this exchange is both unpleasant and uninteresting

sorry

>>3319565
Fashion and fragrance are an art form with as much possibility for depth and shallowness as any other

They're simple more quickly as dismissed as one by 2 dime intellectuals with a limited world view because of their own personal heuristics


as for 'spending too much money'

i won't even touch that one with a 30ft pole

>>3319556
>you obviously spend entirely too much


yeah

this is something really embarassing you also spouted off in your first post


from your complete lack of empathy, bitterness and contrived world view I'm just going to assume you're a kid and not really a socially inept and intellectually malformed adult

for my sake

>>3319527
>not just pure vanity


you have a lot of growing up to do

i don't even know where to begin from your two posts

i just hope you're just a kid

>>3319476
Most hamfisted interpretation of an art form I've ever seen

>>3316591

and depression =\= boredom

>>3316564
>Depression is caused by a lack of serotonin and other chemical neurotransmitters


And what does any of this have to do with any of what you posted

I don't even know where to begin

You really need to take some basic Psych and Neuroscience classes because nothing of what you're saying is in any way connected or makes a lick of sense

>>3316478
>Consider: depression is nonexistent, practically it's just under-stimulation, AKA boredom, as our lives get easier, the less "happy" we are.


What? Not at all

Depression can arise from many causes

And for me it certainly isn't understimulation

If anything, it's excess of negative stimulation

This is literally the most bizarre description of depression ever

It sounds like like you're trying to describe ennui

>>3309294
>The irony

You really need to brush up on basic semantics.

>>3309248

Not me, but keep shitposting some more and maybe you'll convince anyone of how aloof you are, hicklet

>>3309254

Hick = anyone with low cultural capital

>>3309218

>I'm spending my evening arguing about things I'm completely unfamiliar with


>Literary criticism? G-G-G-G-Get a life...!!!

Hick.

>>3309210
Why doesn't it matter?

See, I can shit out 9th grade level rhetoric shitposts too.

>>3309196
>It's almost like art is subjective


It's almost like you're a white hick with no cultural capital who deflects his complete inability to take input at but the shallowest level as 'b-b-b-but subjective!'

Having different appreciation =\= being completely unable to discern a piece's intent (which is surprising, consider how shallow CP's work already is)


Seriously, I don't know what's worse
Fight Club or the people it panders to

>>3309167
>this book introduced me to nihilism

Holy shit

I wonder how people can enjoy something and yet COMPLETELY missing the poin

>>3308669
No they're both absolute shit

I'd actually say the movie was even worse because it didn't even portray the original work accurately which leads to white hicks everywhere lauding it as epic inspo for anarcho primitivism

>>3307620
>Heh.
>Heh.
>Heh.
>Heh.

>>3307513

Clumsy socialist propaganda
anti-bourgeois rhetoric

>>3307498

>fine arts

>pre raphaelite/victorian trash

i would have banned u 2

if i was a mod i would ban u rite now

>>3306656
great post

>>3306653
Honestly the guy having the 'breakdown' comes across as the most level headed and direct person in the thread

Everyone else comes across just as mad, but especially threatened and trying to come across as aloof with all the 'lels' and le meme shitposts