/lit/ - Literature

>>6477669

Why are you on the side a liberal

>>6477046

You probably don't. Let's be honest.

>>6477014

It's influenced heavily by European literature. Then again, European literature is heavily influenced by the Mediterranean for as long as there was a Western civilization.

In other words, there's not much difference.

>>6476685

Do you think you're funny.

>>6476723

Get hit by a car.

>>6476684

How many times must I say that's not me. I live in San Diego. There would be no reason for me to where that kind of shit.

>>6476651

No.

>>6476661

#me

>>6476664

I mean he could be worse and I'm really unsure that most of you look any better.

>>6476642

I could travel the entire world ten times over and be no closer to finding "truth" than what I already expected to come from it. And that's obvious with Harris, that he found exactly what he thought all along.

>>6476636

Do you enjoy reading Scientific American?

>>6476625

That's not fucking me

>>6476620

Nah.

>>6476613

Again, not my face. And I'm not going to post my face either cause let's face it.

That dude doesn't look too bad, though.

>>6476610

>>6476603

>>6476594

Sam Harris is less than eggs.

>>6476516

I want to punch his face in because he looks like a douche.

>>6475381

>let me listen to meme stirner instead of actually well studied literature because I know the truth unlike those fucking intellectuals.

Stirner hasn't been extensively explored for a reason.

>>6475370

>I haven't read any of her books

But you parrot her so well!

>How?

Both are reactionaries relying on own cultural norms of sacrificial power relations.

>Top cuck

I'm black so if anything I'm the one doing the cucking. At least, according to the joke.

>Sounds Orwellian.

Orwell couldn't write for shit.

>You're irratoinal.

Nope you're mistaking me for individuality.

>>6475343

>Of course there is. You're just a loser and subscribe your failures to the game being "rigged".

Ok Ayn Rand.

>By your definition, "winning" would be living like the cannibalistic tribes of Papua New Guinea.

That's more by your definition.

>Then you should seek medical attention. I didn't know you were this far gone.

Western Civilization deserves to be destroyed in high impact sexual violence. Is that better?

>No it's not. If you are unable to appreciate individuality then I am afraid that you are a slave.

Individuality is slavery.

>Of course you would. All of your opinions and decisions are irrational

Individuality is irrational

>>6475327

>>6475320
>No, you're not a "tool", you're a wiling participant in the game of society. Obviously there will always be limitations to what you can do, for example kill your neighbour and seize his house.

There is no game. You are seeing it as a game. You are stuck more in a fence being deprived.

>That makes no sense.

You are winning in no sense unless you somehow escape the power dynamics that enforce your position and so your perception of your own individuality and so your life as you at least understand it.

Until you can escape the role and stereotype you fit than you have "won" nothing. You've lost yourself into a script.

>Lmao. You cannot be serious.

I am serious. The West was somewhat on the right path but for the most part is a total cancer.
I am very serious.

>False rhetoric.

True rhetoric. Individuality is a contradiction of society.

>>6475322

Even I'd take them over sycophantic Capitalists.

>>6475326

Dorito hicks please go.

>>6475296

>It is indeed

It has been since we decided to keep warm around fire. We've adapted past limitations.

>Yes there are. People who win without cheating.

Nobody wins. You're bound by the relations of power you play and enforce. You are a tool and so are they.

The problem is, people who think their lives and others are a game (without getting into how fucking creepy that is), are failing themselves by living under a code of winning.

>Jej. Individualism is the reason why western civilizatoin soared to new heights starting from the 17th century, while the various asiatic societies stagnated.

Exactly. Individualism created The West, thus it reared its ugly head and deserves nothing but total scorn. Individualism is a total cancer of society.

Individualism does not involve any kind of questioning, and is inherently the thing of total contradiction.

>>6475273

For each according to his ability and strength sounds like a more efficient use of a billion plus.

Plus, people shouldn't have intrinsic "use" to be able to survive bare minimum. Categorizing any man as a resource is a leftover tradition.

Intelligence is not a make or break of a being. Simulating natural selection through the social of man is the one of the worst ideas in the long sad history of bad ideas.

>>6475277

Then cheating the game is the solution. There are no "worthy" people. People who consider themselves anything above dirt are leeches.

Individualism is the cancer that already killed western society.

>>6475265
>you have no use,

In what kind of efficient society do people have no use

>>6475258

Put your trip back on. Then get hit by a car tomorrow.