/lit/ - Literature

>>8437133
Oh hey, the guy who thinks saying "you have trisomy" is an imaginative insult is back.

>>8346995

Imagine being so triggered by /pol/ you get paranoid schizophrenia and you start posting a strawman of /pol/ 24/7. You have trisomy.

>>5020534

you have trisomy, you fucking mongoloid.

>>4609132
>>4609115

>posting Finnegans Wake in any thread ever
>misspelling the title
>trying to defend oneself

retards
autists
you have trisomy

>>4554014

>You can't say grass is green, I once saw purple grass! You can't say grass is green, you haven't seen enough grass!
assess the invalidity of comparing the quality of literature with the color of grass.

>Pure comedy and pure tragedy
define comedy, define tragedy.

>nigga
>

>not hahasobsob stuff
tragicomedy? I'm sure you know what you mean with a term like 'hahasobsob stuff'

>Who else goes to the extremes of A Midsummer Night's Dream versus King Lear
see all the authors I mentioned here >>4553990, esp. Proust, Joyce, Cervantes. Setting aside your bardolatry and puerile Carlylian hero-worship, why do you think it matters that one author should write masterpieces in two distinct genres? Would MSND be less a masterpiece if it had been written by John Lyly and King Lear, by Thomas Kyd.

you have trisomy

>>4522762

>needed a dictionary to find out what sovereignty meant
>not recognizing michel de montaigne

you have trisomy

>>4497178

Not that guy, but:

How is this autistic? Montaigne wasn't even writing in old French (nor was Shakespeare writing in Old English). But if >>4497117 wants to practice his language skills he'd be better off with a more modern author anyways.

you have trisomy

>>3275250
>>3275255
Cool, thanks.

I haven't read what he's said about Kant and this was a way for me to get you to tell me what he said about Kant.

sincerely,

you have trisomy

>>1893512
Post-modern poetics can be broadly defined as literature predominantly concerned with questions of ontology as opposed to (the more modern) literature concerned with questions of epistemology.

One assumes that we should learn how to BE, the other, that we should learn how to KNOW.

But, like any lucid human being would know, both are not mutually exclusive. The further you push your epistemological questions, the more likely you are to find yourself in ontological territory, and vice versa. Pynchon's Crying of Lot 49 perfectly highlights this limbo. Oedipa is caught between multiple worlds, both of being and of knowing.

If you have read Joyce, you'd understand how he does something very similar, but of course, you haven't. We are still coming to terms with this transition towards ontology but we can never quite escape epistemology entirely and so The Crying of Lot 49 is not dated at all, if anything it's more relevant now than ever.

You have trisomy.

>>1843061

enjoy your DFW / fanfic / turrible modern japanese literature, faggot.

>>1843055

Fuck no. I'm a doctor and I'm here to tell you that you have trisomy.

>>1826660

Well, this is going nowhere.
Just so you know, though You have trisomy.


As for the rest of you, I'm disowning this thread because there are so many trisomic fucks up in hurrr.

alright nigger, listen here...


Nevermind, you have trisomy. That's all I want to tell you.

>>1821674
>>1821674
>>1821674


>incisive political commentary
>implying politics have anyplace in literature
inb4 1984 and Brave New World, you little faggot
>implying your A- is anywhere near as interesting to employers and universities as my 16.5 french baccalaureate diploma (17 in philosophy & 16 in English O.I.B.)


You have trisomy.

>>1820944

>Jesus also died over 100 years ago

You have trisomy, you failure of a tripfag.

What an original character!

He bases his political convictions on children's literature.

You have trisomy

Would you care to post your own review-- not just your opinion?

What are we supposed to respond, when you say

>absolutely brilliant
>laced [...] with so much more than the 'average reader' might pick up on

It's painfully inane-- especially for an imageboard dedicated to the discussion of literature.

I stress the word discussion, because there is absolutely no intelligent discussion that will come from your post.

Please try again.

or everyone will believe that you have trisomy

>>1790380

You're bad at impersonation.
You have trisomy

>>1101356
LOL NO. I think it's pretty clear that you have Trisomy 21 and are simply too emotionally inept to appreciate the humanities, or "all art." Uncultured swine.

>>1101214
Ok so you have trisomy 21 and autism.