/lit/ - Literature

>>4179027
at the time I had not yet acquired a cold and my shirts better fit my admittedly ample frame

>>4179020
to measure in such a way is just a form the primordial sin of miserliness so I could not tell you

>>4179023
I accidentally forgot to fill in my name after not wanting to attract undue attention posting threads about the jewish conspiracy on /pol/ and asking for pictures of the female cast of The Sarah Conner Chronicles feet on /tv/

>>4178895
bourgeois science
my god
>>4178900
The box acts as a kind of obscene supplement to the toilet, which is an obscene supplement in itself- the doubly obscene supplement cancels itself out and the toilet enters the domain of The Real; it is exactly this kind of analysis I want to provoke of liberal capitalist democracy, the toilet being a tool for this purpose
>>4178952
I ghostwrote several of the Goosebumps series in lieu of my close personal friend R.L. Stine, including Say Cheese and Die, The Ghost Next Door and my personal favourite How I Got My Shrunken Head- this is by far the most fruitful period of my work
>>4178953
thomas pynchon
my god

>>4178882
bourgeois sleep schedules
my god

>>4178876
>>4178872
this is the true paranoia

>>4178870
the conservative political commentator and my close personal friend Bill O'reilly gave me, as a gift, Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing- of course, an old verson intended for children as a kind of obscene joke about capitalist waste, the irony being of course that to me it was of great use, one mans trash being the treasure of another and so on

>>4178858
may I answer your question with another question
why are Croatians such monkeys?
>>4178860
paranoiac fan-tah-sies

>>4178857
Is this not a banal, obscene recreation of stalinist show-trials?
of course, go for it

>>4178855
really existing socialism

>>4178804
Is "edge", "fedora" etcetera not a self-imposed bourgeois mentality even on the ostensibly free, communal boards of 4chan? The irony, of course, is that without exception the very people decrying these things were at one time guilty themselves; it is a form of capitalist destruction over cultural capital in order to keep the treadmill running, so to speak; there must be 'progress' even if it is totally imagined. The result is that in a self-contained sphere of rapid dialogue, the 'right' and 'wrong' opinions become quickly formalised and shift far ahead of the 'real world'- the standards are in effect useless because the cultural capital exists in one sphere but not the next, an age-old capitalist trick
>>4178847
stalinism

>>4178828
americans
my god

>>4178801
Is this very form of total sexual conquest over the mouth, which is of course the most 'personal' of the human orifices, the ultimate last frontier of bourgeois capitalism?
I am reminded of nothing so much as Ridley Scott's "Alien" and the two immediate sequels following; of course the typical stupid liberal opinion is that Alien3 is a failure as a conclusion because there is only one alien and the stakes are thus lower- no! The alien, an abstract violent sexual force is irrelevant, the true antagonist is the company itself, with the goal crushing any hope for community uprising by conquering the last area of proletariat freedom, the sexual realm- fulfilling their deepest fantasy of Droit du Seigneur and the Formalisation of their rule
So to answer your question, of course, have not we all?