/lit/ - Literature

>>14937210
yes
That video in particular is exemplary of behaviour I find repugnant.
Pay close attention to her body language.
She clearly knows she's being provocative by wearing only underwear away from the beach, and she shifts around make herself a dynamic object to keep attention in people's vision.
See how hard she's forcing herself to keep her eyes glued on her phone? It's a prop to get away with her attention-seeking.
She's probably desparate to look around and see if anyone's looking at her, but she knows the facade of aloofness would be compromised if she did, so she performs the anxiety-soothing movement of stroking her hair.
All-in-all when you analyse behaviour like this closely, it's pure narcissism and pathetic self-objectification

>>14937193
dont do me dirty like that

>>14937075
okay fair enough, I'll agree to disagree on that point then
>>14937108
done breh

>>14936935
I can't fault you for being physically attracted to post-pubescent teenagers, but if you are of adult age, the dynamic is inherently predatory in our society

>>14936904
I know men dont to the extent that women do. But the point isnt about the degree to which it is thought, but whether it is at all. Yes, women inherently objectify themselves to attract males, middle-aged bulldyke feminists disputing this doesnt convince me of much.
>>14936931
When it fundamentally overrides the genetically-determined aesthetics of your face.
The craziest hairstyle cannot makeup for your face, it's basically an accessory, same goes for clothing, no matter how flattering.
Makeup is purposely used so excessively that it fundamentally alters the perceived proportions and structure of their faces. Men cannot cheat their genetics to this extent, and if they attempt it, they are socially crucified by women, whose eugenics-driven sexual selection mechanisms find it extremely offensive.
Consider for example a man found out to be wearing lifts. Women will mock and ridicule him because he dared to lie about his height, meanwhile, the makeup they are wearing not only conceals every flaw, but enhances and creates illusions about the bone structure of their faces.
No woman knows what canthal tilt is, bit they all apply eye makeup that creates the illusion of a positive tilt

>>14936854
yes.
I find makeup inherently embarrassing and dehumanising. It is not attractive to me, I can spot even basic makeup like foundation from a mile away, and it's gross.
I've known women who never wear makeup, and take care of their skin instead, and they look far better, both physically, and in character
>>14936859
what a coherent and substantive response. Than you for that

>>14936828
correct, I do think that it is inherent in the female mind.
Why would heterosexual people from one gender not consider themselves from the perspective of the other gender? Especially women, whose primary biological function is the selection of a suitable mate as a eugenics mechanism?
>>14936835
Read that image again.
It lists mass abortion, blaming everything on men, useless degrees, useless jobs etc.
Do you like those things? If not, then why make a strawman out of the image?

>>14936800
>>14936810
>women get cosmetic surgery, excessive makeup etc.
>men groom themselves
>this is the same level of deception
Henry Cavill looks the same in every photo
Look up any "attractive" female celebrity with "no makeup" agter her name, and what she really looks like is right there.
They literally adopted drag queen levels of makeup like contouring as a technique.
There is no male equivalent to that level of lying.

>>14936796
>When change happened things got worse
Nearly got it, keep reading and you'll get better at understanding the words

>>14936790
just read moral philosophy
Plato, Kant etc.
I'm sure you have some moral system, but you just can't articulate it

>>14936739
>virgins who defend women blatantly frauding their looks for social status in a way that men never could
would you prefer simp or cuck?

>>14936704
because the hot women who do it, do it for the thrill and novelty
They have access to any dick they want, so they decide to break the law for some new excitement for their burnt-out dopamine receptors.
The men who do it are disgusting for the opposite reason. They can't get pussy through legitimate means, so they prey on girls over whom they have a position of authority

>>14936630
can I be tripfag muh nigga?

>>14936488
woah, upvoted for ebin roast

>>14936478
>right
das rite, you heard me

>>14936470
>he spent the time to right it all out

>>14936443
holy fucking cringe
Is that what r/chapotraphouse told you people who hate on women are like?
for the love of god, please go back

>>14936439
uh...based /fa/ggot?

>>14936385
because any man doing the same (flouting dress standards for attention) would be rightly castigated
Since it's a woman, it's just quirky tee hee look at me
Only a woman would be such an attention whore in the first place, and get away with it

>>14936299
hello

>>14936064
the point of the post is to highlight a woman who got herself in such a pathetic situation
No-one blames the kids and they need all the help they can get

>>14936011
Because how did she get herself into the situation where she is a single mother of EIGHT mulatto children?

>>14936005
no
>>14936008
yes, by me

>>14935911
>SERIAL KILLER NOT BAD! NO ONE BAD! EVERYONE THE SAME!