/lit/ - Literature

who want what? who pumped up to get rolled up?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okaNIRTXvV0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OCELK9bZxg&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCVSyhjBhro&feature=related

>>2174001
>>2173997

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Plz-bhcHryc&feature=related

>>2173975

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NMGsRmZTFQ&feature=related

bad as in you don't like it because you got too worked up over it.

You're an idiot

>>2172470

You're an idiot.

No one was in the pub except (bar) the tender, who was bustling about behind him.

the sentence is fine...i dont think its "clever" though...unless you're just trying to confuse illiterate 4channers

>>2170919

I see that your professors have told you about how Kant's philosophy is obscurantist, and you probably felt pretty confident when you wrote that, however the term applies to his metaphysics and epistemology not his ethics. Though it is very abstracted as you say, at the same time its prescriptions are distinct, clear, and lacking the ambiguity found in many other moral theories.

The real problem is that the categorical imperative is simply flawed, due to contradictions in conception resulting from perfectly justifiable maxims. that and what this guy >>2170917 said

>>2170833

sorry im foreign...all this time i thought it meant "an addition"...fuck me sideways

>>2170799

This would be impossible if he did not agree with at least one thing that either of them said.

Now...to be fair, he was probably saying "or anything" in same way people say "I'm not serious or anything"... as an unnecessary adage.

I was just being a dick by making it seem as if he was saying "i dont agree with anything either of them said"...

>>2170794

When you put it in terms of "cheapen", you're obviously going to make it sound bad...

>>2170771

But our primal desires should not be repressed. A certain british empiricist once famously said: "reason is, and ought to be, the slave to the passions". Act like the mammal which you are.

>>2170697

i already said sorry ty, i wasnt kidding either...no need to have a period.

>>2170655

i'm sincerely sorry tybrax... i was out of line.
i'm a petty human being who tries too hard.
it is none of my business, and people should come out of the closet on their own terms.

The magus. It's sexually charged yet subtle enough to not make you come off as a creep.


but then again...no book will guarantee that outcome. you need to make moves.

>>2170634

No actually it's great. Unless you're hideous and awkward. I imagine that ugly people, whenever two of them actually sacrifice their shame and come together, must be in great pain when having sex. Their disgusting flesh bobbing up and down, the avoided eye contact... i don't know how an erection is kept. I've always wanted to see ugly people fucking. Like a nugget fucking a downie. Or a palsy victim fucking someone with marfan syndrome...it would be 100 times better than animal planet.

>>2170599

Fuck off with you slattern. Your opinion is about as useful as nipples on a breastplate.

words are wind

hodor said hodor

such beautiful blossoming cancer polyps in this thread

>mfw mysticism and other delusions are now /lit/'s favorite "philosophy".

>>2170417

Coolie high keeps ya wiiiiiiiidddeeeeee

>>2170386

>implying the opinions of a depressed closet homosexual matter.

really tybrax...just out with it already

yeah but not that faggot you got pictured, or any of these depressed odd future teenagers everyone seems so excited about

early mobb deep
early 3 6 mafia
camp lo
dr. octagon
waka flocka
gucci mane (he's really retarded, but i get this headrush from songs like gorgeous and wasted)
tupac
ghostface
jedi mind tricks
cage
gang starr

>>2170219

>2011
>considering any form of platonism as philosophy

>>2170207