[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.14465920 [View]

>>14465901
>>14465892
no

>> No.14465904 [View]

>>14465896
nothing, its from the lambro guys book, its extremely cringe

>> No.14465898 [View]

>>14465890
If I was gonna tell the story I'd already be paraphrasing, idiot!

>> No.14465887 [View]

>>14465855
Don't, they're all extremely normie. If they read at all, they're all AT best gonna be liberals who read either YA or about meaningless progressive political issues, biographies and the like. The only reason is if you dont have a girlfriend, and even then I wouldnt, because 1) there usually are only like 2-3 people unless its the biggest bookstore in a town of at least 500k people, and 2) a lot of them are pretty old, like 30+. and 3) even though they have a dumbass personality, they're usually not very good looking either.

>> No.14465868 [View]

>>14465856
shut the fuck up incel

>> No.14465865 [View]

>>14465549
>>14465832
he retroactively refuted them like guenon and parmenides didnt retroactively refute whitehead

>> No.14465814 [View]

>>14465800
Glad to see that you agree with me. Try reading what you posted, then what I posted, then the excerpt from the SEP, and see whether your quote actually proves what you said, or disproves what I said.

>hint: it doesnt, because you are a moron

>> No.14465788 [View]

>>14465555
also, checked

>> No.14465782 [View]

>>14465657
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-mind/

read this if the critique is too hard, you absolute moron.

>> No.14465644 [View]
File: 203 KB, 2508x349, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14465644

>>14465620
>guenonfag retroactively refutes himself

based! your quote misunderstands the meaning of "representation" in the kantian sense. for example, deleuze in difference and repetition concieves of the conception of difference in itself as existing and delineates its properties in great detail, on the condition that it isnt subject to the possibility of representation, which is something kant already does in the start of the transcendental analytic, in the first critique, and develops further in the second critique, with regards to moral agents. read Kant and stop being a dumbfuck

>> No.14465589 [View]
File: 32 KB, 857x282, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14465589

>>14465586

>> No.14465584 [View]

>>14465576
>btfo's materialism
>>14465549
>gets called materialist by room temp iq midwit on 4chan

nothing personell kiddo

>> No.14465571 [View]

>>14465496
kierkegaard, evola, augustine, aquinas and pretty much all analytic philosophy

>> No.14465555 [View]

>>14465456
sounds boring, read blindsight instead

>> No.14465549 [View]
File: 1.35 MB, 640x921, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14465549

>>14465419
>>14465426
>retroactively refutes plotinus, guenon, whitehead, hegel, bogdanoffs, deleuze, hegel, land, and himself
>retroactively solves all of philosophy
>tells humanity how to achieve FTL travel, direct contact with god, enlightenment, penis enlargenment ect

nothing personell kiddo

>> No.14444721 [View]

>>14444698
difference and repetition for philosophy. echopraxia and blindsight, or rememberance of earths past for fiction.

>> No.14444645 [View]

>>14444597
shut up, didnt i tell you to leave my thread?

>> No.14444537 [View]

>>14444503
>>14444497
>>14444484
>>14444477
>>14444462
butterfly, show your wings!

or have i already won?

>> No.14444473 [View]

>>14444450
>>14444465

hehe, maybe in the next universe

>> No.14444444 [View]

>>14444093
bump!

>> No.14444093 [View]

>>14444035
also, fuck you, dont show up in my threads anymore

>> No.14444071 [View]

>>14444059
what about now?

Navigation
View posts[-96][-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]