/lit/ - Literature

>>21642890

>the demonic side of paganism


AS IF THERE WERE OTHER SIDES TO IT.

THE LITERARY LIFESTYLE IS WAKING IN THE AFTERNOON OF A DAY THAT COULD BE, EITHER, TUESDAY, OR SATURDAY —NO ACTUAL DIFFERENCE—; DRAGGING YOUR BODY THROUGH THE DAILY LIGHT CALISTHENICS ROUTINE; SHOWERING WITH WARMCOLD WATER, THEN WITH COLD AT THE END; TAKING TWICE AS MUCH TIME DRESSING, AND GROOMING, YOURSELF; EATING CEREAL; BROWWWSING; COMPLETING A LESSON IN «DUOLINGO» TO KEEP YOUR MULTIANNUAL STREAK, EXPECTING THAT THIS WEEK YOU WILL GATHER THE WILLPOWER TO MAKE IT TO THE PROMOTION ZONE, AND GET BACK UP TO THE PEARL LEAGUE, WHERE YOU BELONG; READING A PARAGRAPH WHILST ASPIRATING FECAL PARTICLES IN THE BATHROOM; EXCRETING A HAIKU WHILST PERAMBULATING IN THE KITCHEN; EATING WHILST WATCHING A HISTORICAL PRESENTATION RE NERO CLAVDIVS CÆSAR AVGVSTVS GERMANICVS VIA «YOUTUBE»; DEFECATING A «TWEET» THAT WILL BE SEEN BY 90, READ BY 10, LIKED BY 1; SAVING MORE IMAGES OF YOUR WIFE; RECEIVING YET ANOTHER SUPERPOLITE REJECTION LETTER; AFTER HAVING DRUNK OVER SEVEN CUPS OF COFFEE THROUGHOUT THE DAY, GOING TO BED, AS THE PALLOR OF PHŒBVS' NASCENT SPLENDOUR PIERCES THROUGH THE NIGHTLY FIRMAMENT FROM BEYOND THE HORIZON.

ATTACHED IMAGE PERTINENT: MY WIFE.

C00L BLOGPOST.

LEARN SYNTAX; LEARN PUNCTUATION: DO NOT USE A PERIOD, OR A COMMA, WHERE YOU SHOULD USE A SEMICOLON, NOR A SEMICOLON WHERE A COMMA, OR A PERIOD; IMPLEMENT SERIAL COMMA.

THERE IS NO PROSODY, NO NARRATIVE, NOR ANY INGENUITY IN THE PROSE: POETICIZE WITH THE SAME MINUTE CARE WITH WHICH YOU ORPHEBRECIZE.

>>21639024


I AM HERE; WHY DO YOU NOT ASK —WHATEVER YOU CLAIM THAT YOU ASKED— NOW?

C00L BLOGPOST.

>>21638924

>Also I'm guessing you aren't catholic anymore because I haven't seen you post anything about it in a while[...]

I HAVE NOT READ ANYTHING SINCE YESTERDAY; THAT DOES NOT MAKE ME ILLITERATE.


>[...] and you don't seem to answer me when I ask.

?

>>21638777


SENECA WENT FROM OBESE TO SKINNY DURING HIS EXILE, AND STAYED WITH THAT PHYSIQUE UNTIL HIS DEATH.

THE VICIOUS LIVES FOR PLEASURE, AND DIES IN FEAR; DIES FEARLESS HE WHO VIRTUOUSLY LIVES.

>>21638533

>I can't read Spanish.


YOU SHOULD.

>>21637735

>do you like her?

TO UNDERSTATE IT: YES, I LIKE HER.


>halfway through the passion according to g.h., the lady having a meltdown because of a cockroach is very funny desu... [SIC]

IT IS NOT A «MELTDOWN», REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER YOU MEAN THAT.


>rich people be like [SIC]

1. FEIGNING POOR GRAMMAR DOES NOT MAKE YOU «C00L».

2. JUDGING LITERATURE WITH A CLASSISTIC PURVIEW IS IDIOTIC, AND ABYSMALLY BENEATH THE OPVS OF CLARICE.

WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE, JOHN MILTON, WILLIAM WORDSWORTH, JOHN KEATS, WALT WHITMAN, EDGAR ALLAN POE, PERCY BYSSHE SHELLEY, SAMUEL TAYLOR COLERIDGE, WILLIAM BLAKE, WILLIAM FAULKNER, GEORGE LEWIS BORGES, BRAM STOKER, ROBERTO BUÑUELO, CARLOS FUENTES, FERNANDO PESSOA, HARUKI MURAKAMI, HARPER LEE, GORE VIDAL, THOMAS PYNCHON, ET ALII; THE SERIAL MENTIONING COULD BE PROLONGED AD INFINITVM, OR AD NAVSEAM —WHICHEVER FIRST OCCURS.

BETTER TO HAVE, AND NOT READ, THAN WANTING TO READ, AND NOT HAVE; BEST TO HAVE & READ; OPTIMAL: NOT HAVING, AND NOT READING.

«THE THING» PERTAINS TO TECHNICS; «THE HOW» PERTAINS TO SCIENCE; «THE WHY», TO PHILOSOPHY; «THE FOR WHAT»: TO THEOLOGY.

TECHNICS, SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, THEOLOGY, ARE MUTUALLY COMPLEMENTARY, NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

THIS IS OFF TOPIC.

A CONVERSING ROBOT? LITERATURE IS OVER.

>>21617203

>what about Jupiter expresses Majesty


ITS BIGNESS.


>>21617212

>What about mercury is witty?


ITS QUICKNESS.

NO NEED FOR BOOKS.


SUN: HOT.

MOON: COLD.

MERCURY: WIT.

MARS: BELLICOSITY.

VENUS: SEXO.

JUPITER: MAJESTY.

SATURN: SEVERITY.


THIS IS THE SVMMA OF ASTROALCHEMY, IN THIS POST.

>>21613849

>AT A SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL.


... OR ANY SPECIFIC ENTITY, ACTUALLY.

>Is it possible to write poetry about anything?

YES.


>Does it need to rhyme?

NO.


>Can you write a short poetry about pic related?

YES.


>What the fuck even defines poetry?

METRE.


>How does it differ from a love letter, for example?

EPISTLES ARE TYPICALLY PROSE DIRECTED AT A SPECIFIC INDIVIDUAL.

>>21608978


FOUR STROPHES, TWO VERSES EACH; STROPHES ONE, AND FOUR: FOUR SYLLABLES, AND TWO; STROPHES TWO, AND THREE: THREE SYLLABLES, AND TWO.