/lit/ - Literature

>>2018770
>leave your own self.
Sounds like an euphemism for suicide.
You should try it.

>>2018765
I know exactly what you thought you meant.
You thought you had a decent troll.
Then when pointed out that you were wrong, you couldn't accept defeat, so tried to minimize the damage instead.

Just go back to /mu/ and stay there.
I know you've been infecting this board for a while now, but you can always just leave.

>>2018755
The iphone has many games, including many which are only on the iphone. While it is not a gaming exclusive platform, it certainly can be used as such.

>>2018751
>implying the iphone isn't a handheld console.

>>2018660
No, you supposed to note that it wasn't your work and give credit to its author. You plagiarist!

Franz Liszt would disapprove of your tripfaggotry and usage of his name, so you should cease & desist.

Depends on your definition of god.
None of the gods featured in religion exist, so if you mean that, then no.

>>2018649
>>2018650
>>2018652
Suddenly copy-pasted walls of text everywhere.

>>2017556
I should have Ico: Castle in the Mist in a few days. I pre-ordered months ago during a sale on books from that company. You do realize it was released only yesterday right? Why do would you think such an obscure book would already be available?

>>2018411
You have no money what-so-ever?
So you basically a http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasite_single
Good luck with that!

>>2013739
You must intentionally try to make the shittiest posts.

>>2009400
Have you considered responding back in Korean?

I mean, if it's such a wonderful language, shouldn't you take every opportunity to use it?

Oh wait, that's right. Your whole Korean thing is just a trolling routine.

>>2009322
Incorrect. I'm harassing you based on the characteristics that I "know" about you.

Specifics are irrelevant.
You also post the most, so naturally I reply to you the most.

You could always stop using your tripcode.

>>2009311
>>2009313
I put those two in there to see if you would reply to them and ignore the actual argument.

Yes, yes you did.
Shame on you.

>>2009287
You make an assumption that readers have infinite amounts of time.

Our mortality dictates that we must ignore the majority of everything and thus isn't worth our time.


>as he has an understanding of what makes all bad books bad and all good books good.

Incorrect. It simply means that the person in question has read them. They may not posses the ability to understand what makes them "good" or "bad". You are assuming they are reading with critical analysis in mind rather than simply enjoyment, or even for less than that


I find it amusing how you always masculine pronouns. Though, I suppose it's only natural you'd think that men are the ones who can do anything.

Finally, about how you can't change it from "safe" to "sage" because I'll call you out on your mistake. I give you permission to change it.

>>2009273
I'll save you from your path of tripfaggotry yet.

>>2009229
>there is no such thing as a book "not worth reading".
This is one of the hyperbolic statements where they mean "almost every" whether than "all" but they feel lying by making it all makes it more persuasive.

Anyway, Kimichi, you're brand of trolling won't work /lit/. Its effectiveness is limited to /int/. So you might as well give up unless you are going to by troll by proclaiming Korean literature as the best literature and give examples why it is while proving that non-Korean literature is terrible. Otherwise, you will just be ignored.

>>2009236
At least your posts are more comprehensible now.
I think your posting style is special enough to be known if you don't use a tripcode. A rare feat.

So you should drop the tripcode and name.

>>2009235
Get back to /a/, /jp/, /v/, /e/, and every other board I see you tripfag on.

/lit/ doesn't need any more tripfags. If you want to stay, drop the trip.

Are you the kimchi from /int/?

Did you get forced from /int/ for being such a failure of a tripfag that you had to leave forever in shame?

I hope you realize you are the North Korea of tripfags.

>>2009210
You aren't very good at this you know?

It's like an ape coming into a city and flinging its literal shit around masturbating in public.

Then the ape leaves and thinks, "Goddamn did I ever troll them."

I assure you that nobody thinks that and my analogy is entirely accurate.

Please refine your skills before attempting again.
Thank you.

>>2009199
>the real truth which lies in semantics
Oh, so you are a Deep&Edgy wanna-be.
Shoo shoo>>2009156

>>2009156
>butterfly
>inb4 you respond it isn't a butterfly and it's simply Cyrillic characters that look like one.

>>2009188
>ChampionOfTheLegion

>anonymous is legion XD and I'm their champion. :3

>>2009167
Apparently you think /b/ style trolling is the best way
I suggest you return there.