[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.6043937 [View]

>>6043929
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_idealism#Meaning_of_idealism

P.S.

You realize Kant is one of the people in the fucking picture of this article right?

It's things like this that are making me think you're baiting me.

>> No.6043933 [View]

>>6043929
Before I go could you tell me where in Hegel I can find the part where he says the Noumena is a contradiction in terms? Or maybe give me a summary of the argument? I didn't find it in the wikipedia article.

>> No.6043931 [View]

>>6043929
BHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

Have a nice night kid.

>> No.6043927 [View]

>>6043919
But, Kant was a German Idealist and he didn't think that the notion of the Noumena was a contradiction in terms.

So...

Why did you say that and what does it have to do with Hegel?

>> No.6043924 [View]

>>6043910

This was fun.

Have fun being wrong about things.

Your pal

-Satan Atheist

>> No.6043917 [View]

>>6043911

>ask for someone to back up some outrageous fucking claim they just made
>Proof that you have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

Yeah okay bro. Before I leave, can I just get a quick citation for where I can look up in Hegel where he says that the Kantian notion of the noumena is a contradiction in terms?

>> No.6043909 [View]

>>6043902

You mad or something bro?

:^)

>> No.6043898 [View]

>>6043871

Get some reading comprehension skills sport.

>> No.6043894 [View]

>>6043877

Why? And what does this have to do with Hegel?

>> No.6043874 [View]

>>6043855

Wait, am I to understand that you're...not trolling?

No...this has to be bait.

Fuck it. I'll bite.

What Hegelian conclusions have you drawn from your reflections on Kant? Pretend I'm not terribly familiar with Hegel.

>> No.6043864 [View]

>>6043844

Come back when you get out of fucking high school kid.

We already have too many of your ilk shitting up our board.

>> No.6043842 [View]

>>6043832

#wow #philosophy

I'm going to stop posting in a troll thread now.

>> No.6043830 [View]

>>6043827

This.

>> No.6043828 [View]

>>6043819

What made you realize this thing that is so obvious? This sounds like rather abstract metaphysical reasoning to me, which involves some considerable amount of intellectual effort in my experience.

>> No.6043821 [View]

>>6043813
>I-I-I was j-just kidding. Ha, you look so stupid durr...

I hope you die in a car accident tomorrow the planet is overpopulated as it is.

>> No.6043810 [View]

>>6043802

Got me to reply/10

I hope you die in a car accident tomorrow because the planet is overpopulated as it is.

>> No.6043801 [View]

>>6043796

There is no evidence of any works that contradict his corpus in any way.

Go fuck yourself.

>> No.6043799 [View]

>>6038608

Come back when you're not 19.

>> No.6043790 [View]

>>6043762

>drinking the positivist cool-aid this hard

You better have a fucking argument to back this up.

>> No.6043770 [View]

>>6043767

No.

>> No.6043765 [View]

>>6043757

You fail to understand me. There is an extensive historical record concerning the life and writings of Aristotle, and nothing in there suggests that he ever rejected his system as spelled out in the surviving works.

>>6043755

Secondary reading I would just suggest Vol. I of Copelston's History of Philosophy. I don't trust many contemporary readers of the Greeks who aren't Catholic (not a Catholic myself I just think analytics are fucking retards when it comes to understanding ontology.)

Also check out Brentano's On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle. That's really all I can think of at the moment unfortunately.

Navigation
View posts[-96][-48][-24][+24][+48][+96]