/lit/ - Literature

>>1097323

I liked it.

>>1097312

Well come on man, put some discretion to use. Narnia is included because for the most part every creature in Narnia is an anthropomorphic animal, humans being a rarity in that area. And yes I know, Narnia =/= The Chronicles of Narnia, but whatever.

Through the looking glass may >feature some talking animals, but it's not really what I was looking for when I made this thread.

>>1097287

No you big fat gay bitch. And neither does The Little Prince.

>>1097243

The art style, music and voice acting was great. As a stand alone movie it's easily 8/10 on a bad day. As an adaptation of the book it's somewhat lacking, but aren't they all?

I could list my grievances with the movie, but it all comes down to the time allotted to tell a story. If I could have the movie extended and changed to be more like the book it would not necessarily be a better movie as a result.

Also did anyone here ever read Tales From Watership Down? I enjoyed the story about Campion since he was my favourite character from the novel.

>>1097237

Fuck you and your condescending ellipsis, and the two G.O books you've managed to reverse vomit into your brain.

Books featuring anthropomorphic animals

God Tier - Watership Down
High Tier - The Wind in the Willows
Mid Tier - Chronicles of Narnia
Low(ish - high lit if under 13) tier - Redwall Series
Shit Tier - Can't think of any right now.

Discuss anthropomorphic animals in literature. Especially in Watership Down.

By the way does anyone remember that Watership Down animated television series? It was pretty terrible and interrupted my childhood good programming. I marked it as being British right off the bat and I wasn't too damn far off the mark.

>>1097219

Without looking I know this is Zeitgeist.

>>1097212

You... you can do that? :O

>>1097214

You're a bit too smart for me to tango with ser.

>>1097200

And, and, aaaaaaaaand

and

We are born of woman. Some of us that is.

>>1097203

>So this is /lit/

>>1097159

ah >of course
Anachronistic

quite

>>1097185

Even Bernard could fuck hot bitches if he felt like it.

But seriously if you don't believe BNW is as bad as I say it is, try reading the first few chapters about the kids touring the site where they splice up their humans. It's just obnoxious writing.

>>1097164

>Implying everyone here wouldn't love to live in Brave New Worlds dystopian paradise.

>>1097161

Yeh when you're running a country or whatever don't use it as a manual or nuthin...

Oh man, I agree completely OP. To Have and have not was ass.

I don't really like Hemingway on the best of days. I'll hit this thread with;

Dostoyevsky - The Double
John Steinbeck - The Grapes of Wrath

Brave New World is a helping of cock and a side of Balls.

1984

>>1097126

Oh and since neither have a choice neither are real villains, if I didn't make myself clear, or if my post was a bit too deep for your shallow levels of comprehension.

>>1097121

Grendel is no more able to not be a villain than Moby Dick is able to not blow his blow hole.

herewegoagain.jpg

>>1096884

Hasn't everyone?

>>1096864

You mean you >don't know? tut

>>1096862

It's not an argument, don't worry your pretty little Vonnegut reading head about it.