/lit/ - Literature

Did he actually kill himself?

>>21795912
>>21795930
>>21796104
>For many if not most people, surrogate activities are less satisfying than the pursuit of real goals (that is, goals that people would want to attain even if their need for the power process were already fulfilled). One indication of this is the fact that, in many or most cases, people who are deeply involved in surrogate activities are never satisfied, never at rest. Thus the money-maker constantly strives for more and more wealth. The scientist no sooner solves one problem than he moves on to the next. The long-distance runner drives himself to run always farther and faster. Many people who pursue surrogate activities will say that they get far more fulfillment from these activities than they do from the “mundane” business of satisfying their biological needs, but that is because in our society the effort needed to satisfy the biological needs has been reduced to triviality. More importantly, in our society people do not satisfy their biological needs AUTONOMOUSLY but by functioning as parts of an immense social machine. In contrast, people generally have a great deal of autonomy in pursuing their surrogate activities.

Thoughts on Anti-Tech Revolution?

Now that the dust has settled, was he right?

Has anybody ever been able to refute his complete annihilation of leftism?

Is he the final boss of philosophy? He is the logical extension of Nietzsche imo, he perfectly predicted how liberal democracies will lead to a sick, demented, and weak society.

Is he the final boss of philosophy?

Why has Ted been appropriated by anprims even though he hated anarcho-primtiivists?

I’m writing a paper about AI and he would be very relevant to my topic. But I know he was a murderer and that might instantly discredit my paper

>>18102018
correct
>>18102030
correct
>>18102042
correct

When is his next book coming out?

>>17696339
He had the decency to shut himself way from society though

Based on his works, what did his ideal society look like? Do you think he agreed with the hippies of his day?

I'd like to write a mail to Mr. Ted K, but I live in europe. How should I proceed?

Have we failed him? No one seems to do shit in regards to stopping the rapid advancement and proliferation of the industrial and technological system

Manifestochads........ I kneel

Do you think they'll let him publish another book? I'm curious of the things he'd say about this whole Covid situation

>>17192927
Embrace collapse. Even if you expel all the blacks from Europe tomorrow it will still be a degenerate technocratic hellhole. There's nothing worth conserving.

>>16989752
>Also, he's afraid of technology which is another sign of stupidity.

Take the Tedpill, anon. I stopped using my computer and am working up to drop my phone and I'm way happier.

If I write Kaczynski, will he respond? He's very old, but I have questions that burn in my mind. Also, what address do I even post it to?

>Modern leftish philosophers tend to dismiss reason, science, objective reality and to insist that everything is culturally relative. It is true that one can ask serious questions about the foundations of scientific knowledge and about how, if at all, the concept of objective reality can be defined. But it is obvious that modern leftish philosophers are not simply cool-headed logicians systematically analyzing the foundations of knowledge. They are deeply involved emotionally in their attack on truth and reality. They attack these concepts because of their own psychological needs. For one thing, their attack is an outlet for hostility, and, to the extent that it is successful, it satisfies the drive for power. More importantly, the leftist hates science and rationality because they classify certain beliefs as true (i.e., successful, superior) and other beliefs as false (i.e., failed, inferior). The leftist's feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual's ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is "inferior" it is not his fault, but society's, because he has not been brought up properly.