/lit/ - Literature

>>20069331
>>20069312
>>20069240
based
so funny to see the commiecucks with their 'WELL ACTUALLY MAYBE GOD IS A HINDU WOMAN' or whatever other tripe as their only argument when Zizek is LITERALLY quoting Dostoyevsky and talking about the Christian god in a way that is undeniable. It goes to show not only are they too stupid to actually know what they are talking about, they are so stupid they talk in spite of it, illiterate and without reason, they are simply parrots with worse morals.

>>19461939
I'm detecting a lot of fear from atheists these days.

>>19462367
>Then you're one the few good Christians around and I will ignore the fact that you secretly wish i burned in hell.
>You're only a good Christian if you agree with the major points of my anti-Christ ideology!
Yeah nah. You're just pic related, you know nothing about the faith and have no grounds to stand on in regard to how Christians should practice the teachings of Christ. You're just the typical manipulative little shit who tries to argue Christians need to act more like secular humanists and be less offensive to your Satanic sensibilites.

>>18913474
based, fuck all retards who try to reduce everything into yet another anti-capitalist diatribe regardless of how inappropriate
it's so tiresome how all the late stage capitalism reddit-cronies spill their autism here without end, as if any of them are even capable of believing in god, Dostoyevsky and all literature is just a pretext for them to reach their already established conclusions in more and more popular mediums as some kind of demented confirmation ritual, they are a virus that's claimed nearly all of the mentally stunted man children in today's generation

friendly reminder that René Girard was not a real christian and that he used christianity as a tool to push his political agenda

>>14565294

>>13297703
Careful, you're "insulting" that poor anon. Sit down! Be humble!

>>12192030

>>11301911
>That's not an argument I'm afraid, deontology and consequentialism are two different things.
Translation: I'm going to bring out jargon from ethics that have no relevance to the topic at hand as an obfuscation tactic. I have no real objections to provide.

>At this point it's clear you're looking for a reason to post your infographics so I'm just gonna stop arguing with you.
Translation: you're going to start posting substantial and decisive evidence for your arguments, so I'm going to exit before you have the chance to knock out my belief system once and for all.

>Remember to confess after Mass, anger towards your fellow men is a sin.
Translation: I have no real understanding of religion, and I do not practice it myself, but I will use it as a tool to bludgeon you with as one last ditch attempt to avoid confronting your arguments.

Leftists are some of the most disgusting creatures to walk the planet.

>>11301913
The changes in action go hand-in-hand with changes in values. You'd have to be sophist to argue against this.

>>11301923
>I am so delusional that if you consider Rawls to NOT be a conservative, then you must be an advocate for Goebbels
Is this the power of leftist echochambers?

>>11301931
>haha, no, it is YOU who has a distorted sense of the world for not thinking that the champion of social liberalism ISN'T A CONSERVATIVE
For fuck's sake dude. No reasonable person would agree with you. Get some fresh air, will you?

>>11301937
I don't really know at this point. I'm all over the place. I used to be a leftist until I entered university and encountered sophist, virtue-signaling fucks like the people you're seeing in this thread. As much as I like reactionary thought nowadays, I still find myself skeptical (but not hateful towards) capitalism, and I still have fond feelings towards the early American republic. There's not really a coherent ideology that can capture the essence of EVERYTHING that is wrong with the human condition. But I've been finding that religion has been a good start so far.

>>10071813
>slaughter of millions
of Christians. 20 million Christians died under the Soviet Union; 20 times more than the total casualties under the Crusades.