/lit/ - Literature

“The economists have interpreted the world’s market in various ways. —The point of the Revolution, however, it to change it!”
—M. Bakunin

>>21568245

0/10
Can you go back now

>>19446158
https://youtu.be/FzdmDTiSFN4

>>18936490
>1917 fantasy sequence
The people had a short lived revolution, but it was turned into a coup. Ideally a military action to keep the Whites from seizing power would leave the pernicious arrangement to sink into the swamp of history. Actual political power would rest in all, not as party members, but as one wills, each town and district divvying up into manageable segments. With enough support even a rocky start could quickly adapt. After witnessing/hearing of the political shenanigans of the Mensheviks (minority) taking advantage of the split Bolsheviks (majority), one would think to steer clear of mere 51% rules
> your party, that isn’t a party, has great support with itself
They would have to. They would have to outnumber and outmaneuver the statists. Some governmental systems need to be kept, like Graeber points out transportation and international trade, but these are small manageable branches. The Law givers and military are what need to be dissolved and fully integrated by the people
>The coups
Again, this variable all depends on the amount of popular support. If the “Blacks” can’t convert the Reds and would-be Whites the. You have that civil war. The decaying Whites had support with upper middle class bitches and brainwashed patriots. But why won’t revolutionaries think in revolutionary terms? In the case of the failed Russian revolution, the patchy Reds were brainwashed to believe it was a successful revolution they fought.
>Firstly, explain how YOU—
There can be numerous individuals setting themselves free, but the jailers catch up with many. There can only be a collectivist revolution. But we ought not alienate the individualists with talk of “dictatorships of the proletariat”. That’s not a step to the commune, that’s a dead end leading back to the problem we’re trying to revolt from.

>>18883000
He not all bad

No.

>>17506684
And instead you all lock yourselves away to spaz out on each other

>>17323321

>>17073388
Stirner
Bakunin
Luxemburg
He’s still standing is somewhat chiseled away at. No need to be a “Marxist” to be a good socialist.

>>17073405
What, like soda?

>>17073461
No, liberals erased leftism, adopted the name and now you’re still confused about the deception. Lol.

>>16116910
My favourite track
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzdmDTiSFN4

> Marx pointed the way, long ago, when he wrote in The Eighteenth Brumaire, “Men make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.” Unfortunately, this has been a difficult insight for radicals to absorb. They tend to forget about the first five words — “Men make their own history” —and instead remember only that our actions are circumscribed by the past. Even one of my favorite group of theorists, now coming to be known as autonomous marxists, but who I always called anti-Bolshevik com- munists or Western marxists, is guilty all too often of writing about the working class from the outside, rather than from the inside as strategists for abolishing wage slavery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE0neN9mvcY

>>15670207
> Marx pointed the way, long ago, when he wrote in The Eighteenth Brumaire, AMen make their own history, but they do not make it just as they please; they do not make it under circumstances chosen by themselves, but under circumstances directly encountered, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all the dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living.@ Unfortunately, this has been a difficult insight for radicals to absorb. They tend to forget about the first five words B AMen make their own history@ B and in- stead remember only that our actions are circumscribed by the past. Even one of my favorite group of theorists, now coming to be known as autonomous marxists, but who I always called anti-Bolshevik com- munists or Western marxists, is guilty all too often of writing about the working class from the outside, rather than from the inside as strategists for abolishing wage slavery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE0neN9mvcY

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FzdmDTiSFN4

>>13883671
Wrong

Yeah, I don’t like reading books that make me feel like crap and think everything is hopeless.

>>13638984
Here
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FzdmDTiSFN4