/lit/ - Literature

>>411038
>>implying that implications require greentext

>>411053
>implying they do

>>411049
>>implying that isn't true for every thread.

>>411054
>implying pigs are a relevant image to this thread

-

>>411066
>implying i wouldnt fuck the one in the red skirt in that picture

>>411070
>>implying it's possible to post something irrelevant to this thread

>implying my posts will end with doubles

>>411071
>implying your pathetic sage can stop the horde of awesomeness emanating from this thread

>implying this isn't exclusively an /sp/ meme

>>411075
>implying OP's pic wasnt relevant

>>411089
>implying this is a meme

>implying it originated from /sp/

>implying im not behind you watching you imply things on that shitty computer of yours.

>>411090
>>implying this pic isn't relevant

>>411079
>implying that implications work in that manner
>implying that you understand how greentexting implications work
>implying that a greentexting implication doesn't involve responding to another post's assertions by interpreting what contextual implications arise from the statements involved

>>411100
>implying nazi cat doctors are not always relevant

>>411108
>implying hes not 12 and what is this

Is there a more ironic book title than this, /lit/?

>implying i have something to imply

>>411034

>>implying that we need more people to archive this

>>411120
>implying that you can derive a definite knowledge of someone's identity through an anonymous post, and that said poster couldn't possible be one of several other things; retarded, dumb, foreign (in the sense of coming from a non-western culture and having english as a second langauge), a woman or a wow-addicted neckbeard whose intelligence has been substituted for an e-penis.

(sage goes in all fields.) I can't escape ">implying"; people in real life even say it now. Damn you 4chan, damn you.

>implying this is lupus, when it is clearly not lupus

>>411131
implying wat.

Is there anything more ironic than Glenn Beck's very existence?