[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 801 KB, 1171x1495, Cirno.full.977944.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9955412 No.9955412 [Reply] [Original]

Why are you so interested in little girls?

>> No.9955415

They are very little... and they are girls. So cute!

>> No.9955418

The opposite

>> No.9955421

I-i'm not!

>> No.9955423
File: 28 KB, 175x217, 1348249187905.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9955423

>> No.9955427
File: 41 KB, 544x415, big.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9955427

>>9955418
Big girls?

>> No.9955429

>>9955427
She is more akin to a hippopotamus.

>> No.9955430

Flat chests are the best!

>> No.9955446
File: 548 KB, 1000x1030, Seal.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9955446

>> No.9955448

They are pretty.

>> No.9955449

They're pure, innocent, cute; it's perfection.

They're so perfect I can't defile them; I can only admire and protect them from the shadows, looking at their nothing worth of future, where they all rot.

It's beautiful at the beginning, but then it makes me cry.

>> No.9955451

I want to have sex with one no matter what...

>> No.9955453

Missed opportunities.

>> No.9955456

Because I wish I were a little girl.

>> No.9955458

>>9955449
Interesting, and where do you admire them from? A full address of your local school or park would be great.

>> No.9955459

>>9955449
btw. I'm a pedophile

>> No.9955464

I'm not.

>> No.9955467

They look and sound more cute in my cartoons. That's it.

If you have any reasons involving "innocence", "purity", "naivety", or anything like that, then you are an pedophile who is an risk to our children.

>> No.9955469

>>9955459
Oh? I couldn't tell.

>> No.9955473
File: 37 KB, 450x330, 20110607104038438027.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9955473

>>9955459

>> No.9955474

Should I become an elementary school teacher? It doesn't sound like a hard job and I could look at cute little girls all day long, no pedo.

>> No.9955475
File: 216 KB, 600x800, 1327536718545.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9955475

because of dem little feetsies

>> No.9955477

>>9955458
Nice try, Steve, you think you're smart enough in that your FBI chair?
Fuck yourself and tell Mike I hate him and he will never catch me.

>> No.9955487

>>9955467
I bet Sanae is you favorite 2hu.

>> No.9955488

>>9955412
We're biologically predisposed to feel protective towards children.

From an aesthetic standpoint, the younger someone is, the less time there has been for their body to be damaged by the environment and for subtle defects in their genetic code to manifest. A close-to-flawless adult is much rarer than a close-to-flawless child.

>> No.9955490

>>9955475
I hate pictures like these, they're dumb and look like something taking straight out of some tumblr sluts blog. I also hate beaners.

>> No.9955498

I fuck my little sister daily in my dreams.

>> No.9955514

They are weak, and don't challenge me. Much no fun to break.

>>9955498
He he, we have a lot in common, I fuck your little sister everyday too!

>> No.9955519

>>9955490
I agree. Fucking tumblr sluts.

>> No.9955582

>>9955490

They hate you too.

>> No.9955590

They are so pretty and pure. They look so soft and warm that I just want to hug them to see if they really are. They are usually sweet and kind to me and are very cute. I just love them!

>> No.9955601

>>9955590
Get out of here, pedo scum!

>> No.9955606

Can atheists explain why little girls are much more sexually arousing than mature adults, with all their evolutions and big bangs? Or does this prove the existence of a malevolent creator?

>> No.9955746

>>9955606
Its evolution's way of getting you to protect them and not kill them.

>> No.9955771

How can ye not be?
They are superior to adults in every way. Theyre not bitches, theyre sweet and cute, they don't have bullshit feminist ideaologies that tear society apart. They are interested in things other than money and men. They want to smell flowers and catch butterflies, and ask insightful questions.
Also, the small body, big head, flat chest is just aesthetically appealing to some.
Once you get boobs, your nothing but a sex object designed to reproduce.

>> No.9955776

>>9955746
What about fucking them?

>> No.9955808

>>9955776
That's comes naturally with the protecting part. Nobody can do anything to them while you mount them.

>> No.9955843

>>9955776
Evolution does not care about things like that. Those are constructs of ‛civilized’ men.

For instance, rape is a very successful reproductive strategy. Natural selection is very callous. That's why 95% of species are now extinct.

>> No.9955859

Fucking them doesn't get them pregnant. This controls population growth and keeps it down to an acceptable limit. It's an balance with the sex drive that makes sure we don't die out.

That's why pedophilia makes sense in evolution.

>> No.9955883

>>9955606

What do you think atheism is? Just another cult with inherent rules and beliefs? Being an atheist doesn't imply that you believe the evolution is true, nor the big bang. It just means you lack belief in a god. That's it.

>> No.9955925

dey qt

>> No.9955975

I can't believe there has been only one response saying they wanted to be the little girl

This board is a shell of what it once was

>> No.9955994

>>9955975
yea dude fucking neo-/jp/
If only ZUN!bar was here amirite

>> No.9956005

>>9955975

I've seen increasingly more people being told to get back to /a/, upon saying that.

>> No.9956006

because they dont say anithing when you touch them

>> No.9956014

>>9956005
It's a reaction to its common usage over in /a/, much like "waifu".

>> No.9956027

>>9955475
I love little girls feet but I love their shoes more. I think I would really enjoy tying a little girl's shoes. I volunteer at an elementary school, and one of the kids had her shoes untied. But she wouldn't let me tie them no matter how much I asked. It made me sad.

>> No.9956033

>>9956027
Where do you work?

>> No.9956042

>>9956027

"Volunteering". Right.

>> No.9956045
File: 138 KB, 300x300, 1349751593782.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9956045

>>9956033

>> No.9956067

Little girls seem to be attracted to me. Their parents always tell me how they can't stop asking about me and always want to meet me again.
Can I somehow make a profit with this?

>> No.9956075

>>9956067

You can be their friend.

>> No.9956086

>>9956027
Don't ask, just do it!

>> No.9956103

>>9956075
Would you consider that to be very profitable?

>> No.9956109

>>9956103

You'd make them happy, which would make you happy, in turn.

Just don't molest them, or something.

>> No.9956116

>>9956109
>Just don't molest them

Shit taste.

>> No.9956110

>>9956103

Do you even loli?

>> No.9956117

I'm not interested in them, I just want to hug them.

>> No.9956122

>>9956109
>>9956110
I'm talking about money dorks!
I can't live of the love of lolis alone, although it would be big bonus if I could make it my profession.

>> No.9956124

Why do so many people here consider certain things as thought crimes?

Someone mentions pedofilia and everyone is shocked.

I thought that people here on the internet would not be that brainwashed.

>> No.9956131

>>9956124
Fuck off you pig!

>> No.9956133

>>9956124
People from /a/ can't admit to their desires, so they use terms like "lolicon". The /q/ invasion certainly hasn't helped.

>> No.9956141

>>9956116

But that's not good.

>>9956124

Normalfags bandwagoning things perceived as bad, and blowing it out of proportion, without even knowing why they doing it.

>> No.9956143

>>9956133
>so they use terms like "lolicon".

Urgh. I get wanting to point out that you only like 2D children, but denying you're a pedophile is the epitome of normalfaggotry, and completely hypocritical.

>> No.9956145

>>9956116

>Implying real
>Not glorious 2D loli
>Not projecting self

Shit taste.

>> No.9956153

>>9956143
/a/ is full of normals so it's not that surprising. I foresee this thread being invaded by crossboarders who insist they aren't evil pedophiles soon enough.

>> No.9956169

>>9956143

Well, what do you call yourself if you only like 2D then, exactly? Or is that still technically pedo? Because as far as I know, this issue hasn't even been brought up in the scientific field, so we might be left without our sexuality being defined. In that case, me might as well define it ourselves. Lolicon is as good a word as any.

It's not hypocritical if you just want to make sure you're factually accurate, and it doesn't imply distancing yourself from pedophilia. Which would be retarded.

>> No.9956177

>>9956143

I'm not sure of the validity of this statement.

A lot of viewers of 2D loli do not want access to 3D child porn.

>> No.9956179

>>9956169
You're still a pedophile, you just have a preference for 2D. Just like there are perfectly heterosexual men who like exclusively 2D.

The only difference is that pedophiles who also like 3D are demonized while heterosexual men who also like 3D are seen as normal. Thus the different words.

>> No.9956185
File: 189 KB, 629x691, 1342390511190.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9956185

>>9956153
>>9956177
>I foresee this thread being invaded by crossboarders who insist they aren't evil pedophiles soon enough.

>> No.9956207

>>9956086
That sounds like something a rapist would say.

>> No.9956208

>>9956185
Great job, Nostradamus.

>> No.9956215

I, I, I love little girls
They make me feel so good
I love, little girls
They make me feel so bad

When they're around
They make me feel
Like I'm the only guy in town

I love, little girls
They make me feel so good

They don't care if I'm a one-way mirror
They're not frightened by my cold exterior

They don't, ask me questions
They don't, want to scold me
They don't, look for answers
They just, want to hold me

>> No.9956220

>>9956179

Having a preference for 2D implies you're also attracted to 3D, which isn't necessarily the case. Or are you arguing that it doesn't matter whether it's 2D or 3D, and that both should be considered pedophilia?

Again, I haven't seen the scientific community discuss the matter, so it isn't as cut-and-clear as you're making it out to be.

>> No.9956222

>>9956185

I don't consider pedophiles to be evil, but I don't sexualize 3D children personally - it is platonic. 2D is certainly sexualized, for me, and I don't consider the two comparable.

I don't think difference between 2D and 3D sexual preferences is uncommon.

>>9956215

Good song.

>> No.9956232 [SPOILER] 
File: 131 KB, 520x390, gayy.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9956232

>>9956222
>>9956220
I love jerking off to large muscular men with meaty cock but that in no way translates into a 3D sexuality. I am a unique snowflake.

Real men? PIG DISGUSTING!!!

>> No.9956239

>>9956232

You bring up an interesting point. I haven't really considered it before, but now that you mention it, that would be a sexuality separate from normal homosexuality, and it might warrant a separate definition. Any proposals?

>> No.9956247

>>9956239

Homocon.

>> No.9956248

>>9956239
>that would be a sexuality separate from normal homosexuality, and it might warrant a separate definition

Why are you /a/ children so delusional?

>> No.9956254

>>9956248

Why are you so intolerant of ideas that vary from your own?

>> No.9956261

>>9956239
Billycon.

>> No.9956282

>>9956220
If you are a man who likes yaoi, you are gay.
If you jack off to >>>/d/4339963, you have a diaper fetish.

You can absolutely loathe 3D. The fact that you are sexually attracted to children is what makes you a pedophile. Remember that pornography predates photography.

Just because some normalfags get upset by pedophiles and think pedophile means "child molester" doesn't mean you should go around justifying yourself because you choose "not to identify" as a pedophile. It's just as ridiculous as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_who_have_sex_with_men

It's a recent phenomenon, but the term I've seen used in a couple of scientific articles is "cartoon pedophilia", and lolicon is described as "simulated child pornography" or "virtual child pornography". It's a subset. Imagine if you said you were a man but you "weren't a human being", because the majority of the human race is female and you hate females.

>> No.9956291

>>9956177
Doesn't change the fact that you're a pedo. Just a 2D pedophile.

I mean, we don't have another word for heterosexual interested only in 2D. Why do we need another word for pedophiles interested only in 2D?

>> No.9956318

>>9956282
>>9956291

It's easier to use "lolicon", than to use "pedophile who only likes 2D" every time.

>> No.9956340

>>9956318
As long as you still acknowledge you're a pedophile.

>> No.9956360

>>9956318
"2d pedo" and "lolicon" have the same number of characters

>> No.9956381

Pedophile has had it's meaning hijacked, and is synonymous with "child molester" for the majority of people.

I think it's easier to define new words, than to try to revert the meaning of hijacked ones; a lot of English words have changed in meaning, over time.

>> No.9956404

>>9956291

It would be helpful with a replacement word for pedo since people have abused it to mean child molester instead of person who thinks young humans are attractive.

I'd wager not even 1% of the "pedos" would ever harm another human, just how it is less than 1% of the men who rape women.

Personally though, I prefer imagining being the little girl having sex. Two things that will never happen in real life (being a girl, and being young again).

>> No.9956422

>>9956404

Ironically, a "child lover" is probably the least likely to harm a child. A child molester does not like children; they like fulfilling their desires with them, regardless of consequence to the recipient.

>> No.9956691

>>9956404
>Two things that will never happen in real life (being a girl, and being young again).
You have given up. You will not live to see /jp/ Manor.

>> No.9956791

Pedoagalmatophilia.

>> No.9956825

>>9956691
Does magic exist in the manor?

>> No.9956944

>>9956825

Technology will make us the little girl.

>> No.9958078

>>9956153
I'm from /a/. It's not full of normalfags, and most of us accept being pedos. What now?

>> No.9958106

>>9958078
People here have extremely warped views of other boards and sites. Don't bother.

>> No.9958116

I want to be one

>> No.9958702

Can I still come to the manor if I'm a guy? I just want cuddle. I can be a guard or a butler or something, and you can pay me in hugs.

>> No.9958702,1 [INTERNAL] 

Why does the maid hate little girls so much?

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action