[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 128 KB, 1280x720, nippl_f194.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9663008 No.9663008 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.9663020

That must feel nice.

>> No.9663025
File: 70 KB, 251x260, 1346297033959.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9663025

>> No.9663032

>>9663025
What's the story behind this picture?

>> No.9663035

>>9663025
fuck that dog is freaky but cool. can i save that pic?

>> No.9663043

>>9663035
You know you already have. No need to ask regardless.

>> No.9663048

>>9663043
i didn't, i always ask for permission. its good netiquette.

>> No.9663058

>>9663025
Is that your dog? Why did you make him wear tuxedo?

>> No.9663062

>>9663058
he obviously likes the tuxedo. hes smiling. hes not being forced.

>> No.9663071

I bet the guy who uploaded the picture of the dog is EXTREMELY ATTRACTIVE.

>> No.9663077

>>9663062
But he looks pissed.

>> No.9663078

>>9663071
Why you think that, nya?

>> No.9663094

Well can't you see, it is obvious. He is a supermodel, probably Korean, Japanese or Ukrainian.

>> No.9663100

>>9663025
This looks like a crop. Where did you get that image?

>> No.9663105

>>9663100
I found it like this. I can't remember where.

>> No.9663144
File: 59 KB, 1180x790, IMG_0925.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9663144

Then there is the prohibition of realistically depicting sex with an animal. The law does not care whether the animal wanted sex. I've read that male dolphins try to have sex with humans, and female apes sollicit sex from humans. What is wrong with giving them what they want, if that's what turns you on, or even just to gratify them?

But this law is not concerned with protecting animals, since it does not care whether the animal really had sex, or really existed at all. It only panders to the prejudice of censors.

A parrot once had sex with me. I did not recognize the act as sex until it was explained to me afterward, but being stroked by his soft feathers was so pleasurable that I yearn for another chance. I have a photo of that act ; should I go to prison for it?

Perhaps I am spared because this photo isn't "disgusting", but "disgusting" is a subjective matter; we must not imprison people merely because someone feels disgusted. I find the sight of wounds disgusting; fortunately surgeons do not. Maybe there is someone who considers it disgusting for a parrot to have sex with a human. Or for a dolphin or tiger to have sex with a human. So what? Others feel that all sex is disgusting.

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action