[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 222 KB, 1033x1348, 1329520097937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9117122 No.9117122 [Reply] [Original]

that's not chocolate

>> No.9117130 [DELETED] 

i'd still lick it off anyway

>> No.9117134

i'd still lick it off

>> No.9117142

>>9117122
fuck off worst 2hu

>> No.9117144
File: 244 KB, 640x800, choco.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9117144

Chocolate thigh highs, I like it.

>> No.9117153
File: 56 KB, 765x444, flanders.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9117153

>>9117142

>> No.9117171

>>9117122
makes sense since shes a shit 2hu

>> No.9117211 [DELETED] 

>>9117142
>>9117171
You called?

>> No.9117215
File: 157 KB, 286x480, moco.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9117215

>>9117142
>>9117171
You called?

>> No.9117225

>>9117215
Go to bed Kaguya

>> No.9117233

>>9117215
Why hate Mokou so much? does it because she has bigger boobs than you, Kaguya?

>> No.9117261

>>9117233
kaguya is better but flanshit is still the worst 2hu

>> No.9117270
File: 45 KB, 286x480, evenbiggerpileofshit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9117270

>>9117261
You keep calling me what do you want?

>> No.9117289

>>9117233
Because she is unfappable.

>> No.9118493
File: 885 KB, 1036x1449, e4ee395354d76a8829ad88fe6e01d6b98cb2eea1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9118493

>>9117289
Eeeeeeeh!?

>> No.9120047
File: 117 KB, 657x335, muddydicks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9120047

>> No.9120051

>>9117233
I don't mind the hate, it just means my love for her is more unique.

>> No.9120067

>>9117122

Stop using the spoiler function incorrectly

>> No.9120083

>>9117122
It has the wrong consistency to be much else.

>> No.9120091

>>9120067
I think that's an acceptable way to use it since the text actually ``spoils'' the image.

>> No.9120093

>>9120091

Perhaps it's at the very limit of being correct or incorrect...
Still, I'd refrain from using it

>> No.9120110

>>9120093
Fortunately most posters aren't you.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action