[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 206 KB, 1536x1024, 44X1T.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8756977 No.8756977 [Reply] [Original]

Japanese dog will never get the pizza. ;_;

>> No.8756985
File: 556 KB, 1536x1024, 1328511428211.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8756985

>> No.8756984

He has already gotten the pizza. Dogs are dicks that have no respect for things that are not their own.

>> No.8756996
File: 582 KB, 1536x1024, wolftokin2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8756996

>>8756985

>> No.8757008
File: 482 KB, 300x244, tumblr_lxv15fsftY1qefzooo1_400.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8757008

I DID NAWT HIT THE DAWG I SWEAR

>> No.8757033
File: 8 KB, 132x106, no eating the snacks!.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8757033

>> No.8757042

>>>/g/

>> No.8757079
File: 206 KB, 960x720, vlcsnap-2012-02-17-23h31m42s27.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8757079

WATASHI NO WATASHI NO O-NAMAE WA
KIYOKU TADASHII SHAMEIMARU.
SOKO NI ORIMASU KAWAII-GE-NA
MOMI MOMI MOMI MOMI MOMIJIBON.
MINNA DAISUKI GENSOUKYOU
ANATA NO KOKORO MO GENSOUKYOU

WATASHI NO WATASHI NO O-NAMAE WA
KIYOKU TADASHII SHAMEIMARU.
SOKO NO KAWAII MOMIJI-MAN
MON MON MOMI MOMI MOMIJIBON
KOKO MADE KITARA MOU ANSHIN
ANATA NO ATAMA MO GENSOUKYOU

WATASHI NO WATASHI NO O-NAMAE WA
KIYOKU TADASHII SHAMEIMARU.
SOKO NI ORIMASU WAN-WAN-O
MOMIJI MOMI MOMI MOMIJIBON
KAWAIKU MIETE MO DAIJOUBU
ANATA NO KANSEI SUBARASHII!

>> No.8757085

>>8757008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5utc5TOPNbo

>> No.8757090

that not japanese dog you baka that america dog won't you look at his cutely face

>> No.8758749
File: 52 KB, 331x331, 1332187190014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8758749

>> No.8758755
File: 74 KB, 800x600, 0035.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8758755

try THIS pizza!
*WHIPS OUT DICK*

>> No.8758762 [DELETED] 
File: 141 KB, 341x310, E 2080.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8758762

>>8758755
looks like a monkey
Is he brazilian?

>> No.8758765

>>>/ls/

>> No.8758780

>>8758762
Why are you still here? I know you're British and have a dynamic ISP because RIPE NCC are bakas, but you post dozens of times a day without a single ban.

When did Team 4chan become so lax about ban evasions? Or was there just one guy who saw it on par with CP then quit?

>> No.8758795 [DELETED] 
File: 62 KB, 338x478, 1 (4)33..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8758795

>>8758780
I got an evasion ban a few days ago, the original ban was stupid anyway.

>> No.8758800
File: 651 KB, 1893x2000, 1332113206292.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8758800

>>8758795
What about the other five zillion?

Also one of your first threads (before you became a "normal" poster) was celebrating your ban evasion. I think you lost your right to complain/appeal there.

>> No.8758802

>>8758795
Lemme guess, avatarfaggotry? Moron.

>> No.8758804

>>8758795
Please delete your posts and stop posting.

>> No.8758811
File: 72 KB, 508x314, moetronud.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8758811

>>8758795

>> No.8758818

I think being banned should set a cookie. Then even if you change IP address, 4chan checks for that cookie and re-bans you for evasion.

Of course it would be easy as hell to get around, but it would trip so many people up.

>> No.8758865

>>8758818
I hear those evercookies are pretty much impossible to kill unless you're way advanced in IT expertise. moot should use those to auto-ban ban evaders.

>> No.8758885

>>8758818
I think it should ban the person's Ip address normally, but also do a day long range ban for their entire subnet.

>> No.8758887

>>8758865
Evercookie is a dick move, especially since the author is intending them to be used seriously (rather than a proof-of-concept like all those sites that identify the risks of tracking).
Hopefully people will realize why all this local storage stuff is potentially a bad idea because of Evercookies. Hell, cookies themselves are stupid and poorly designed. Haven't looked it up but I can only hope they were some Netscape or Internet Explorer extension and not a proper part of the original HTTP spec.

>> No.8758897

>>8758885
That could be unfair though since not all ISPs assign IP addresses the same way. Banning 123.123.123.* for example might ban hundreds of users on a common ISP.
Check out /img/. Most of the posts there are people complaining that they were range banned because some mod thought it was a good idea to ban half of Earth in order to stop one spammer or troll.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action