[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 291 KB, 641x682, 1330690869116.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8645048 No.8645048 [Reply] [Original]

Your sincere opinion on people like this, please /jp/.

>> No.8645050

it's funny because arc is black

>> No.8645054
File: 207 KB, 374x335, 1296743085389.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8645054

>>>/a/
dubs thread now

>> No.8645073

>>8645054
Even /a/ doesn't want this garbage.

My opinion is that the dumbass pedophile got what he deserved. Six years is guaranteed, I'm hoping that he gets more.

Also, delete this thread.

>> No.8645078

>>8645073

go back to bed ryan

>> No.8645083

>>8645078
How about you delete your thread you dumbass shitposter? Also, no reason for that, I just got up

>> No.8645092

>>8645083

nice try but I'm not OP. You need at least 1 more hour of sleep.

>> No.8645096

>>8645083
I'm sorry, but I'm not this guy >>8645078
and I didn't know about the background of this picture. Pedophile? What? I was only referring to his cuddling with a portrait and replying to his own self with a fake mai waifu account.

>> No.8645097

>>8645083
Counter-sage

>> No.8645106

>>8645096
Poor old Thad was v& for cp last week

>> No.8645108

>>8645092
I'm pretty sure I don't.

Anyway...

http://www.freep.com/article/20120302/NEWS03/203020340/Man-21-posts-bond-in-child-porn-case-over-Fac
ebook-postings

Wow, they let him out, I can't believe this shit.

>> No.8645114

Please..no more..

>> No.8645119

>>8645108
>>8645114
bump

>> No.8645121

>>8645108
Well he didn't actually do anything ilegal, and the action taken against him was already pretty harsh. He said he was joking, and the FBI probably knows this is true (it is the FBI afterall)

>> No.8645124

>>8645108

I would just kill myself, you can't use the internet anymore.

>> No.8645128
File: 63 KB, 746x813, 1330636492159.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8645128

>>8645121
Seems like it was pretty illegal to me.

>> No.8645131

>>8645128
>included images of tee-shirt designs
Oh, don't tell me it's THAT picture...

>> No.8645136

>>8645128
>tshirt designs
Is this how pedophiles exchange their porn now?

>> No.8645137

>>8645131
I sure hope it wasn't THAT picture.

>> No.8645141

Only whites should be allowed to breed. So it has right points in it.

>> No.8645157

damn how much time is he gonna spend in jail?

>> No.8645159

>>8645137
>>8645131
>designs
It's probably not THAT picture, unless he made a bunch of copies.

Who the fuck would save THAT picture to CP folder for fapping anyway?

>> No.8645163

What is "THAT" picture?

>> No.8645165

>>8645157
Why was he sent to jail anyway?

>> No.8645167

>>8645165
He's a nigger.

>> No.8645170

>>8645167
But that's racism!

>> No.8645174

>>8645128
>\things\don't click
really? you have to try harder to frame innocents, fbi. not even a complete moron would call his folders like that.

>> No.8645176

So is it illegal in the US to possess drawn pictures (no photos of real people) of people, that can be considered to be underage?

>> No.8645186

>>8645176
yes

>> No.8645188

>>8645157
Hopefully he'll get killed in there, he was close to becoming a real danger to children.

>> No.8645191

>>8645176
It wasn't 2D, he had pictures of real children on his hard drive.

>> No.8645195

they always magically find real cp where there shouldn't be.

the fbi has to open their huge cp database/collection and pick some cp from it to plant in the evidence first.

if they didn't, they couldn't destroy an innocent guy's life, and the news wouldn't have any sensationalist things to report.

>> No.8645199

>>8645191
Yeah, I know. I'm not asking about him, just out of interest. And I don't live in the US actually.

>> No.8645207

>>8645176
Someone quoted the cp law in one of these threads earlier and it said anything that depicted a child involved in any sexual activity, be it cartoons, sculptures, drawings, etc, it was illegal. May have been edited to say that though.
Sorry I'm so useless, I'm tired.

>> No.8645209

who gives shit? niggers get into prison every day.

>> No.8645210

>>8645195
You seem to have forgotten that the person in question is a Moor and not an Aryan. Never underestimate the mental incompetence of Moors.

>> No.8645211

>>8645207
i don't think you can actually be convicted for cartoons. otherwise why would they always plant that one/two real cp on his hard drive?

they need a real reason to put him in jail to get their monthly quota of "we're fighting the evil pedos, see? we're too afraid of real ones though so we create them out of innocents", and cartoons just aren't a reason.

>> No.8645212

>>8645207
>>8645199
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
> Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
> (1)
> (A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
> (B) is obscene; or
> (2)
> (A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
> (B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;

You upset, Americans?


That was the post.

>> No.8645214

>>8645211
Cool conspiracy theory, bro. Have any proof besides your tinfoil hat and persecution complex?

>> No.8645217

Bumping this thread to counteract sage shitposters and possible pedophiles.

I'm going to make sure Perverted Justice hears about this Thad guy.

>> No.8645219

>>8645214
do you have a proof against that? why would a 2d lover have that convenient one cp pic on his hard drive needed to persecute him?

the whole "fuck the police" that's present all over the world exists for a reason.

>> No.8645220

People here are doubting whether or not he had actual cp?
He was stupid enough to boast about it on his facebook and tumblr, and he would talk about how he wants to fuck kids. I'd be more surprised if he really didn't have any.

>> No.8645223

>>8645212
Good thing all my porn has high artistic value.

>> No.8645224

>>8645220
oh, i see. guess i shouldn't expect a nigger to be a real 2d lover.

ok, my comments won't be going for him then. but there's still way more of those cases where a 2d only virgin loser gets convicted for cp because somehow they magically found a cp picture on his pc in all of his 2d stashes.

>> No.8645227

>>8645219
Protip: As you are the one advancing the claim that the investigator's report is part of an entrapment conspiracy, the burden of proof is on you to substantiate your position before asking for rebuttals.

Also, it wasn't "one picture"; it was over 300 of them.

>> No.8645231

>>8645224
Truneets shit on the floor.

>> No.8645232

>>8645223
Hahaha, oh you weeaboos and your applying of Japanese culture every where.

Americans are actually smart enough to have a lascivious scale. They show pedophiles no mercy and I praise them for that.

>> No.8645237

>>8645223
Some people see artistic value in stickfigures.
I wonder who defines it in court, though.

I only possess "anyannko" and Rustle lolis, none of that uguu shit, Your Honor.

>> No.8645239

>>8645227
like i said, i wash my hands off the nigger. if he actually said all those things on his facebook, then he probably actually was a real pedo.

i meant it more generally when they find that one cp needed to convict a harmless loser, so that they wouldn't have to risk chasing real pedos or the cp producers who are often deeply connected with the mafia.

the public will gobble anything they say up. especially the dumb american christians, controlling those is very easy.

>> No.8645240

>>8645224
No such thing as a "2d" lover. If you're going to be attracted to Japanese cartoon caricatures of humans you're at least going to be subconsciously attracted to the real thing. All sexual taboos apply if not more for people who claim to like exclusively fiction of it.

My references you might ask? Thaddeus Mcmichael and all of his 300 cp pictures.

>> No.8645245

>>8645240
holy shit. that means i'm actually a vicious murderer since i like guro.

i'm also a slave driver since i like s&m.

>> No.8645243
File: 19 KB, 300x300, 1percent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8645243

Marriage was devised by the 1% to show off their wealth.

A 99%er will never have the money to buy a wife. Waifus are all we can afford.

>> No.8645250

fucking american pigs. i sympathize with the islam terrorists, they have the right idea. your whole disgusting nation has to be completely wiped off the planet.

we need more 9/11, except on large scale.

>> No.8645253

>>8645245
Don't forget that people who play GTA are vicious gang members.

>> No.8645256

I would love to see the expression on the person's face who has to go through all of my pictures in search of CP. There's a total of 80 000 of them.

I kind of wish they would raid my apartment.

>> No.8645257

>>8645250
western yorop is no different. mostly thanks to murrika though. murrikans ruined yorop and uk after WW2.

>> No.8645276

I think he is making fool of himself but who am I to judge? She clearly loves his waifu and is happy with her.

>> No.8645444

>>8645276
only relevant comment in whole thread.

>> No.8645476

>>8645257
yeah, the nazi regime was far more superior

Ah, and let's not forget the former USSR and now Russia... Yeah

>> No.8645499

>>8645276
> she
That is a man.

>> No.8645502

Same opinion I have on all normalfag attention-whores who never shut up.

I'm just glad he finally got the attention he so desperately craved, guy was a fucking idiot.

>> No.8645508 [DELETED] 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ghh7p15MTY

>> No.8645518

>>8645476
american government's not much better than both of them. instead of oppressing its people with military they do so through regular police and fearmongering.

>> No.8645517 [DELETED] 

Same opinion of anyone who uses facebook.

An attention starved normalfag who is part of the problem killing the internet.

>> No.8645531 [DELETED] 
File: 31 KB, 450x342, ハンバーガー.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8645531

American government is okay in my book.

>> No.8645543

>>8645531

Look at that other guy behind Obama stare at his meal just because he doesn't have enough money to buy his own.

>> No.8645567

Just another of fucking white pig scum trying to keep down the superior black man

>> No.8645570

He's going to learn what a penis in his ass feels like soon enough.

>> No.8645571

Just another case of the fucking white pig scum trying to keep down the superior black man.

>> No.8645625

Is it confirmed that he had 3D child pornography?

>> No.8645947

>>8645625
Yup. It looks like he was honestly treating the whole CP thing as a joke though. >>8645128

Like he'd probably laugh at his folder names every morning when he wakes up and then post about how funny it was on Facebook. Combine that with pics like the OP pic and I think it's safe to say this guy was basically a living, breathing autismic circus clown.

He probably never fapped to the CP he had either, but his entire life is ruined anyways because he tried to be funny on the internet. In the end that itself turned out to be the only hilarious thing about Mad Thad.

>> No.8645969

This guy confuses me. I thought it was all just a joke, then he did the whole fucking-his-dakimakura thing, then I realized how much money/time/effort he must have put into it all, then this.

What a queer fellow.

>> No.8645971

Can't wait to see him on Hard Time.

>> No.8645979

This is why I am glad normals are starting to learn about lolicon. It's becoming clearer and clearer that lolicons are also likely to collect real CP. Even those of you who exclusively like 2D, I am sure you have been to Tor hidden services and checked out CP out of "curiosity".
Cute-not-pedo loli is fine, but people who masturbate to drawings of 8-year-olds need to be locked up just as people who masturbate to photographs of 8-year-olds do.

>> No.8645993

>>8645979
Same with videogames. All these children are growing up with these violent videogames which involves killing and other illegal acts. People who enjoy the videogames should be locked up, it's pretty sick.

>> No.8646001

Goddammit, turn down the trolling, /jp/.

>> No.8646009

>>8645993
no, because I like video games

people should only be locked up for liking things I don't like

>> No.8646024

>>8645993
If playing video games was immoral, then sure. But it isn't. Fapping to kids is. You're not simulating fapping to kids, you're fapping to them. There's the difference. Even if not one person in the world was a child molester, fapping to children would still be wrong.

>> No.8646022

FREE THAD
First report: http://www.freep.com/article/20120229/NEWS03/120229035/southfield-child-pornography-FBI-Facebook
FBI's request for arrest/search warrant: http://www.mediafire.com/?5b3cnad1ibrvcy2
Thad pays bond: http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2012120301054

Stallman's wise words: The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, "prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia" also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.

Some rules might be called for when these acts directly affect other people's interests. For incest, contraception could be mandatory to avoid risk of inbreeding. For prostitution, a license should be required to ensure prostitutes get regular medical check-ups, and they should have training and support in insisting on use of condoms. This will be an advance in public health, compared with the situation today.

For necrophilia, it might be necessary to ask the next of kin for permission if the decedent's will did not authorize it. Necrophilia would be my second choice for what should be done with my corpse, the first being scientific or medical use. Once my dead body is no longer of any use to me, it may as well be of some use to someone. Besides, I often enjoy rhinophytonecrophilia (nasal sex with dead plants).

>> No.8646025

>>8646022
He's annoying. Let him rot.

>> No.8646033

>>8646022
> Stallman's wise words
At least post the full thing. It makes less sense out of context. Also Stallman are crazy:

>> In one of your articles, you wrote: If your daughter gets pregnant by the football captain you blame the school for poor sex education. A responsible teacher would have taught her effective birth control techniques as well as pleasurable sex techniques.

> Yes, a good education should include those.

>> What exactly did you mean by ``to teach pleasurable sex techniques''?

> My idea of a sex class is like a massage class or a dance class. You have a class of 10 to 16 people, either equally straight males and straight females, or all gays of the same sex. And one or two teachers.

> The teacher would demonstrate a technique by doing it to a student and inviting the student to do it to the teacher, while the other students watch. Then the students would do the technique with each other, in couples usually, and every so often the teacher would call on one group to advance around the circle.

>> No.8646034

>>8646024
Because morality is absolute and universal.

>> No.8646043

>>8646024
Killing people is immoral, you're simulating the killing. That's fucked up, go see a psychiatrist you sick autist.

>> No.8646039
File: 60 KB, 483x500, comb682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8646039

>>8646033
That's hot.

>> No.8646040

>>8646034
It is, and that's why we have good Christians to teach this to the world.

>> No.8646049

>>8646034
Murder is wrong. Everyone agrees. If we can say murder is definitely wrong, we can extrapolate and say everything is definitely right or wrong. My logic is infallible and I spent all of twenty five minutes coming up with this argument. Q.E.D. No crits please.

>> No.8646054 [DELETED] 

>>8646033
I'd vote for Stallman if he ran for president.

Besides up until the 1970s, Europeans raised their teens in a similar way to what is described, with total freedom.

It led to well adjusted individuals, if a little too pacified.

America's methods lead to bloodthirsty religious fanatics being bred constantly, or to misguided drug addicts.

>> No.8646056

>>8646033
>I want my daughter to be the school whore and fuck all the boys

Okay Stallman. I think I read something like this before in a book. Was it brave new world? Not surprising coming from a faggot commie like him. Having the American flag on his website is a fucking insult.

>> No.8646066

>McMichael
...That's not even a real surname, it's a Scottish prefix and a non-scottish name

>> No.8646089

>>8646056
Having the American flag anywhere is an insult, shit country.

>> No.8646086

>>8646056
That's not what he said, faggot. Ironocoincidentally, Linus Torvalds summed this up quite well in his book Just For Fun. Basically everything goes through three phases: at first it's for survival, then it's for social reasons, then it's just for fun. Food is a good example. We needed food to not die but then it became a part of everyday life, so different foods and how/when we ate them became part of our social lives. Now people cook delicious meals just for the hell of it. Sex is another good example. Obviously we need to breed to survive as a species, but then it became so commonplace that we had all these social rules as to when to breed and who with. Now people fuck for fun and that's something you virgin nerds had better deal with. This is why Stallman's class makes sense.

>> No.8646093

>>8646086
But Linus hates freedom.

>> No.8646107

>>8646093
He likes freedom more than rms.

rms:
> USE THE GPL OR YOUR AN NAZI FAGGOT!!!
(actual quote probably)

Linus:
>To paraphrase Voltaire - "I may disagree with your choice of license, but I shall defend to the death your right to choose it". That goes for Larry, and for the BSD people and for all the people who write software for a living using some really nasty licenses.
>And the same thing goes for users. Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested. 99% of that I run tends to be open source, but that's _my_ choice, dammit.

>> No.8646115

>>8646107
Encouraging the creation of non-free software, as the BSD license does, is evil because it damages the free ecosystem.

>> No.8646126

>>8646115
This. Free software is a community effort. It can only survive if the community is defended from outside aggression, in the form of patents, copyright and other nasty shit.

>> No.8646131

>>8646115
Restricting what you can do with software, as the GPL does, is evil because it gives you less freedom.

Seriously who gives a fuck if something's "free software" or not? All the old school hackers rms likes to pretend agree with him feel pretty much the same way. Donald Knuth and Dennis Ritchie and whoever else all used and developed proprietary software, right up to their deaths (I haven't checked but I'm assuming Knuth is dead by now). They also called Linux "Linux" and used the super evil phrase "open source". Let people distribute, sell, and license software however they want. You want to GPL your software? Great, and I'll agree to its terms if I distribute it (because that's the law). But don't waffle on at me like some door-to-door preacher because I don't want EVERYTHING EVER to be under the GPL.

>> No.8646132

lynch linus

>> No.8646140

>>8646126
> copyright
Go to bed, Aaeru.

Unless you're confusing copyright with "intellectual property" or something. In which case I forgive you. Know that copyright is a good thing and the GPL and Creative Commons both rely on copyright. Hell, rms has copyright notices at the bottom of his page. He's not even trying to shoehorn everything into the public domain like idiots think you can do.

>> No.8646148

>>8646086
Good, I'll make sure to murder you just for fun.

>> No.8646149

>>8646131
Free software is of the upmost importance. Software should serve the user, not leave the user helpless and divided as proprietary software does. Non-free software gives developers control of the user, this is evil.

>> No.8646151

>>8646140
Copyright in its current form IS immoral. Do you deny this fact?

>> No.8646154

>>8646148
Way to completely miss the point.

>> No.8646165

>>8646148
Actually that kind of fits the pattern. People obviously had to kill each other to stay alive, until we formed society and then murder was bad. But people still murdered for political and social reasons. Now plenty of people do murder for fun, or at least play MURDER SIMULATORS like GTA.

Nobody ever said the pattern was moral or ethical.

>> No.8646168

>>8646165
Except that we didn't need to murder to stay alive as a species, unlike with eating and breeding. There is no inherent need for murder at the base level.

>> No.8646176

>>8646165
>RDER SIMULATORS like GTA.

Play sex simulation, aka masturbation instead of sex then.

I'll just go out on a spree, because the dumbass that wrote the example is just making an observation that you decided to take as a fact. I guess that actually makes YOU the dumbass, but might as well lump it together.

>> No.8646172

>>8646151
How copyright is *used* is immoral, but I think to say, "Copyright is bad," is nonsense. Plenty of laws are abused but it does not make the laws bad, even if they need changing a bit.
It's like a pencil. Pencils are great. You can draw or write things and whoever invented the pencil deserves a pat on the back. But you can also stab someone with a pencil, or draw offensive images of Islamic prophets, or write "FUCK YOU FAGGOT!!!!" five hundred times then give it to a poofter. That does not make pencils bad, it's just how they are used.

>> No.8646183

>>8646172
One should be free to write fuck you faggot.
Copyright is evil, it damages the free ecosystem.

>> No.8646189

>>8646168
>Except that we didn't need to murder to stay alive as a species


Yes you did, you needed to murder to defend your food and tribesmen from others.

Crusades were a murder frat party, aka social reasons.

>> No.8646186

>>8646172
Thing is everyone is using copyright how it is currently defined: a century after the original creator dying you still need to pay their offspring money. Absurd.

>> No.8646194

>>8646168
>There is no inherent need for murder at the base level.
Sometimes I step on bugs, just to fill my quota.

>> No.8646197

>>8646189
No, there still is no inherent need. Breathing, sleeping, eating... those are needed for an individual to stay alive. And having babies is needed for the species to keep existing. But I don't need to murder anyone in my life to stay alive. And in the past they didn't HAVE to either. They just chose to do out of stupid beliefs, like Christianity you just mentioned.

>> No.8646199

>>8646183
Let's go back to pre-Berne convention then and have everyone steal each other's shit and run each other out of money and destroy future works. After all, it's not like the internet would easily facilitate tha-oh wait.

Go support CC or something. Stop being a nigger. Copyright is good. Authors and publishers have rights to shit they make.

>> No.8646205

>>8646199
Nice strawman. Where did I say copyright needs to be abolished entirely?

>> No.8646207

>>8646189
Commercial routes, spices, buffer point from future invasions.

Just like how the "War on terror" was nothing but bullying the arabs out of their dinosaur oily shit.

>> No.8646209

>>8646199
>everyone steal each other's shit and run each other out of money and destroy future works
It's funny because history shows the opposite happened!

>> No.8646214

>>8646209
>It's funny because history shows the opposite happened!

That's why we live in a commune now where everything is free. History did really show it right, yup.

>> No.8646226

>>8646205
You said "copyright is evil". I'm no expert at rhetoric so I don't know what that's called, but you did the opposite of a straw man. Sorry for assuming that when you said "X is evil!" it means you would prefer a world without X.

>> No.8646240

>>8646214
If anything hippie communes clearly show that communism or whatever the hell you want to call it do not work.

Greed is part of our nature. Why should I conform with just average when I can just exploit my knowledge and strength to be better off than these monkeys?

>> No.8646242

>>8646209
Uh, what? You mean before the Berne Convention? No it didn't. This is why the Berne Convention happened.

I cannot believe people protest the very idea that I have rights to something I created, just because it can be duplicated easily. I have every right to say, "Fuck off. Don't distribute my work unless I say you can." It doesn't matter if you have a Disney view of the world and "that's selfish :(((( sharing!!! ;___;" because that's the law, and I'm very glad it is. Even rms is not this extreme--he thinks copyright is fine for art and literary works. Hell, most of the content on his website is under the "default" copyright, not even under a CC license or anything. The only reason the FSF have a software-must-be-free attitude is because software carries no artistic value, it is a sequence of mathematical steps. A story can be reduced to 0s and 1s but it is still your literary work. I personally disagree with the FSF and think people should be able to do what they want with software (including slapping an EULA on it and selling it), but my point is that even the most extremist digital freedom fighters are okay with copyright itself.

>> No.8646249

>>8645947
congrats on the marriage

>> No.8646250

Alright. No need to argue individually.

All of you copyright fascists. Stop posting.

Why? Because you didn't create the English language, so it's someone else's property.

>> No.8646254

>>8646250
This argument is so stupid I cannot believe you not only typed it but thought, "Yep, that's sound," and clicked the 'Submit' button.

>> No.8646258

>>8646254
>That argument destroys my standpoint so completely I can do nothing but rabidly deny it and sling insults.
That's embarrassing.

>> No.8646265

Dude was playing with fire and he knew it.

>> No.8646316

He'd be a pretty cool guy if he wasn't a nigger and obvious attention whore.

>> No.8646349

>>8646199
Copyright laws need serious revision. In their current state, they are detrimental to actual creation and middlemen (record labels, publishers, etc) abuse them in order to further profit off of the efforts of the artist. I agree that an artist or writer should have a say over his own work, but often times, the creator has little say over these matters, and instead, the copyright fulfills the will of the publisher rather than creator. A good example of this is sample clearance, in which the word of the artist will mean nothing if the record label refuses to clear a decades-old sample.

>>8646316
I don't know why /a/ and the like loved him so much other than LOLEPICWINMAIWIFUXD. He was /soc/ level trash and made a mockery of 2D. I'm glad he got locked up. He wanted attention, now he has it.

>> No.8646375

>>8646242
>I have every right to say, "Fuck off. Don't distribute my work unless I say you can."
You have the right to say it, but other people, if they don't have the right, certainly have the ability to copy-paste your story into a text file and store it somewhere on the internet. It's necessary to keep the creative economy running, but I find that to be more of a practical consideration than an actual right; if it was an absolute right it should simply never expire.

>> No.8646572

>>8646226
>You said "copyright is evil".
Link me to the post where I said that.

I said "Copyright in its current form IS immoral." and nothing else.

>> No.8646576

>>8646572

>>8646183
> Copyright is evil

Maybe a different guy, but that was the chain of discussion I was following (click the links up).

>> No.8646582

>>8646576
That was, indeed, some different person.

>> No.8646610

>>8646582
I see. Well I'm too bored to argue about anything, and not as passionate about this as I probably made myself out to be. I don't create anything so I don't care all that much, and I'm too self-loathing and drunk now to feel my argument is worthwhile.
I'll concede if it makes you happy.
You deserve to be happy, Anonymous.

>> No.8646670

Oh god, not this copypasta shitstorm again.
Why is /jp/ so shitty?

>> No.8646682

>>8646670
I only see one copypasta in this thread. And it's quite recent (the FREE THAD one).

>> No.8650423

I want to become his penpal

>> No.8650429

>>8650423
He's probably not allowed pen and paper in prison in case he molests children by drawing lolicon.

>> No.8650680

>>8645257
It's common fallacy, actually America is more conservative than socialistic Europe. I live in Europe.

>> No.8650723

this guy got arrested for cp or something last I heard

>> No.8650817

>>8650723
Yeah, welcome to the thread.

>> No.8650896

>>8650723
> this guy got arrested for cp or something last I heard
No, he was arrested for writing statements someone took objection to on the internet. The cp was found after searching him as a result of said.

>> No.8650920

>>8646186
>a century after the original creator dying you still need to pay their offspring money
If it was like that, it wouldn't be nearly as much of a problem. You're not paying their offspring money: In modern commercial art, the PUBLISHER GETS THE COPYRIGHT. You have to abandon your copyright to get shit published. That means that if they decided to pay you $5.000 for your effort and the product goes on to make $5.000.000, that's $4.995.000 to the publisher and $5.000 to you. And in fifty years, that publisher is still making money off of the artist's work, while the artist himself has been discarded by the publisher and starved to death in the meanwhile.

The funniest thing? With that $4.995.000 they made off of someone else's work using minimal effort, they can keep this situation going like this and bri...lobby to worsen the situation even further.

Copyright itself isn't evil, but the way it's implemented...I hope this stuff changes after World War III.

>> No.8650933

>>8650423
>>8650429
Somebody should send him letters containing hand-drawn loli pictures.

>> No.8651012

Oh wow. I've heard about some guy admitting having cp on his computer on facebook but I just now realized that it was Thad. I was already wondering why people were talking about him all the time.

>> No.8651014

>>8650920
No, you also use the money to make adverts saying that artists are starving and poor and losing their jobs because of piracy.

I love the irony in that. They use the money they refuse to pay the artists to say that the artists aren't getting enough money.

>> No.8651018

>>8645176
"No, its protected by the 1st Amendment a law introduced (in 1996 I think) to make it illegal was struck down by an Appeals Court and confirmed by the Supreme Court in Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al, v. Free Speech Coalition et al (00-795) 535 U.S. 234 (2002) 198 F.3d 1083" - www /dot/ hongfire /dot/ com

>> No.8651024

>>8645245
not all scenarios in Guru have to involve murder whereas lolicon always features sexualised images of young children.

if you do get sexually aroused by guru then you're still a sick fuck, but i actually doubt you do and that is your attempt to cleverly make a point

1/10

>> No.8651052
File: 239 KB, 830x1200, cuttingshow1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651052

>>8651024
>i actually doubt you do and that is your attempt to cleverly make a point

>> No.8651061
File: 224 KB, 868x1200, cuttingshow3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651061

>>8651054

>> No.8651054
File: 178 KB, 856x1200, cuttingshow2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651054

>>8651052

>> No.8651062

>>8651052
Trolled hard. You should know by now that Showa says retarded things just so people will call him a retard.

>> No.8651064
File: 228 KB, 866x1200, cuttingshow4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651064

>>8651061

>> No.8651074
File: 235 KB, 869x1200, cuttingshow5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651074

>>8651064
>>8651062
Yes, I've seen enough of Showa to know he's a faggot, I just wanted an excuse to post this again.

>> No.8651078
File: 239 KB, 867x1200, cuttingshow7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651078

>>8651075

>> No.8651075
File: 227 KB, 840x1200, cuttingshow6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651075

>>8651074

>> No.8651084
File: 184 KB, 903x1200, cuttingshow8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651084

>>8651078

>> No.8651088
File: 212 KB, 856x1200, cuttingshow9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651088

>>8651084

>> No.8651098

>>8651093
Fuck this, I was curious

>> No.8651093
File: 134 KB, 900x1200, cuttingshow10.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651093

>>8651088
And final page. Was she really cut in half, or was it all just a magic trick? We will never truly know...

>> No.8651109

>>8651052
>implying that anybody who has a saved picture of goatse is actually turned on by by stretched anuses and exposed rectums and not out of appreciation for the shock value.

>>>/b/

>> No.8651108
File: 104 KB, 865x379, underthisboard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651108

>>8651098
You want me to post the bonus page then?

>> No.8651121

>>8651108
Please.

>> No.8651117

>>8651093
That was sick. I want to see something like that but with people who draw these as tortured character instead.

>> No.8651140

>>8651109
I bet you love penis in you're rectum xDDD

>> No.8651151 [SPOILER] 
File: 217 KB, 891x1200, cuttingshow11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651151

>>8651121
Well, here you go then.

>> No.8651159

Does anyone else find it as ironic as I do that one of the posts on his Facebook page was about how to encrypt cp, and that not doing that simple task is what led to him being apprehended?

I think it's funny just how stupid it is. Of course he probably could never have imagined that they would obtain a warrant over simply mentioning cp.

>> No.8651164
File: 47 KB, 306x680, pic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651164

>>8651117
>That was sick. I want to see something like that but with people who draw these as tortured character instead.
So you're perfectly fine with enjoying inflicting torture and death, so long as the target is someone you can feel RIGHTEOUS ANGER towards and otherwise dehumanise? I guess we're not so different, you and I...

>> No.8651170

>>8651151
Thank you. Now I'm satisfied.

>> No.8651179

I like how this guru dump and its responses are all indirectly done in response to Showa.

>> No.8651190

>>8651024
>lolicon always features sexualised images of young children.

No it don't.

>> No.8651199 [DELETED] 

>>8651108
Post

>> No.8651221

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RLCHcCjVcY

>lik dis if u cry evry tiem
>Rolled1990 2 days ago 41

>your gonna carry that jimmies faget
>fikle 2 days ago 25

>You're gonna carry that soap.
>claytonaut 8 hours ago

>> No.8651240

Why did he openly talk about CP?

Okay, I guess I shouldn't expect any answer other than "he's a fucking retard"

Hope he gets a dakimakura in the slammer

>> No.8651257

>>8651221
>2012
>Gregorian Chants

>> No.8651351

It's funny how lolicon is totally 100% legal, but the second it looks like you support cp, it'll be stacked against you as "Being a danger to children"

>> No.8651352

I can't say I was reading this thread too thoroughly, but I'm confused as to how it went from Thad's conviction to copy right debates.

>> No.8651388

>>8651352
To sum it up, it went: Thad -- Paedophilia -- RMS -- GPL/FREEDOM -- Copyright

>> No.8651412

Getting locked up for thought crime. This society is un - fucking - believable.

>> No.8651418
File: 43 KB, 503x500, 6e85206260296a01996473ed3ccfa59e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8651418

>>8651093
>>8651098
>>8651151
I'm more disappointed by how the audience reaction isn't shown. Hell, the girl pushed her friend to the stage to have this happen to her. I want to see her despair when she realizes what she's done.

>> No.8651429

>niggers are criminals
news at 11

>> No.8651437

>>8651429
Pretty much. Doesn't matter what they got him for, being a negro was enough of a crime.

>> No.8651434

What will his sentence be?

>> No.8651447

I friended him after the sex tape but I unfriended him after I noticed that literally every update he made started with >mfw.

>> No.8651456

>>8651434
It doesn't really matter, society will hound those convicted of sex offenses without end, whether they be public urination, raping and killing, or just looking at pictures.

>> No.8651463

>>8651434
From THE LAW:
> imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years
If he has a prior conviction for this sort of thing (including sexual abuse) it's 15-40 years.

>> No.8651476

I wish we could just put all the niggers into jail-zoo, so there would be no more crimes.

>> No.8651583

What's a tether? Is that like an ankle bracelet?

>> No.8651600

>>8651476
This is already in active practice within the United States except with less of a focus on inmate race.

>> No.8651631

thats just a troll OP

>> No.8651637

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWo7_RHdb_Q

>> No.8651661

>>8651476
>>8651429
Go to bed, slav ren.

>> No.8651726

>>8651637
>Im sorry im a transexual woman and i know for a fact u faggs dat been to prison tha trying o sugar coated or make it seem like it aint that... If a man get his dick hard or is sexually attracted o another man he is a fucking homoooooo!! I know no one real hetero amn that gets hard 4 another masculine man unless he is a sr8 fag sorry!!

>babyloveo7 1 day ago

>> No.8651745

>>8651726
This is the internet and it is stupid.

>> No.8652241

>>8651151
This whole comic depressed me more than anything. Am I a faggot?

>> No.8652267

>>8651463
Doesn't Amerikkan law multiply that time by the amount of offences, in this case pictures? Like, 300 pictures and videos * 5 years = life in jail?

>> No.8652353

I was pondering here that comparison.
"Violent movies don't necessarily make people violent." Which probably is true.
"Porn featuring non-adolescent won't necessarily make people have sex with non-adolescent."

I was thinking that when people watch violent movies they hardly think themselves in as torturer, murderer or victim. But just watch it for kicks and thrills. Usually those who picture themselves in as those murderers or victims are the ones with problems. So, in case of this porn doesn't the one who watches it seek means to interact with it as it usually happens with sexual media. Face it, majority that watches a porn movie would like to be giver or receiver in it.

Then again it is harder for people to connect the world that they see with media that is presented in 2-dimensional form.

>> No.8652668

>>8645048
Why doesn't he have his own ED page yet?
Is there some "one of us thing" that is holding the ED crowd back, or is he just too obscure for them to get interested?

>> No.8652672

The embodiment of /a/.

>> No.8652677

>>8652672
As if /jp/ is any better. You have waifus and all, don't you?

>> No.8652685

>>8652677
I'm sure a portion of us do. There's no way we would ever post pictures like that on some social networking site. I doubt most of us even use any kind of social networking site.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action