[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 626 KB, 1150x1199, 1317804703581.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8440997 No.8440997 [Reply] [Original]

What exactly is a "quality thread" on /jp/? What won't get saged, reported, or deleted by meido?

Am I completely restricted to posting threads about which 2hu to fuck or can I actually start a discussion every now and then?

>> No.8441001

Not a meta thread.

>> No.8441005

All of them. None of them. Neither.

>> No.8441002

I still laugh at how 4chan doesn't understand what sage means.

If only I knew moon so I wouldn't have to spend time on a board that imports foreign concepts and then DOES IT WRONG all the time.

Using sage as a way to "insult" someone's post or thread is just completely wrong and a retarded misuse of a good feature that is so popular in sites like 2ch and Futaba. Fuck, iichan and 4-ch do it right. It's just 4chan and 4chan's lame knockoffs that fail at using sage.

The true meaning of sage means that YOUR POST isn't worthy enough to bump the thread. It's ironic, because you think that you're insulting others while you're just, in fact, insulting yourself. Yes, sage can be used when posting a derogatory comment in a thread that you don't want to bump, but posting with just the word "sage" accomplishes nothing but contribute to spamming the board. The trend of replying with the name of a tripfag and sage is even worse, as it accomplishes nothing and only serves to increase the e-penis of whoever you're "attacking".

The sage feature was never meant to serve as an implied insult or general disagreement! Why people started using it that way is beyond me. There are plenty of reasons why one would choose not to bump a thread with his reply. For example, bumping threads with stupid one liner replies should be discouraged and those people should be coerced into using sage instead.

I want to use sage, yet I almost never do it on 4chan because people will jump on me thinking I'm insulting their post or something.

>> No.8441003 [DELETED] 
File: 62 KB, 600x600, 014.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8441003

Threads with a lot of cute girls in them!

>> No.8441006

QUALITY THREAD.

>> No.8441007

>>8441003
Reported for being Tokiko

>> No.8441008

>>8441003
You're doing it again, Tokiko.
Hopefully you get my point by now.
If I ask again on your blog, will you explain why you keep bumping off-topic/shit threads?

>> No.8441013

I saw a picture of Okuu as I was scrolling down and got all excited in thinking that this was an Okuu thread. Now I am sad.

>> No.8441021

/jp/ is a /v/ board. No anime, no 3D shit, just VNs(book games), Touhou(Shooting games), MMO(animu games) and also doujin shit, games or otherwise.

Kig needs to go to /cgl/
Idolfaggers need to go to /mu/
Figs and dolls need their own board, but won't get it so they can stay.

Everything else is shitposts.

>> No.8441022 [DELETED] 

>>8441008
I don't have a blog

>> No.8441026

>>8441022
> I have a blog
-- Tokiko.
http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/8429267#p8429371

>> No.8441028
File: 1.14 MB, 1840x1848, 1317868231912.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8441028

>>8441013
I never said this couldn't be an Okuu thread, anon!

>> No.8441032 [DELETED] 
File: 82 KB, 500x500, 117.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8441032

>>8441026
>http://fuuka.warosu.org/jp/thread/8429267#p8429371
Not me, ``buddy''

>> No.8441037

>>8441021

>implying im not full of spaghetti righty npow XDXDXDXDXDDXXDXXDDXD

What does /v/ think of katana shoojo?

>> No.8441037,1 [INTERNAL] 

Fuck you, new shitty janitor!

>> No.8441047

>>8441026
Well yeah, the real Tokiko has a blog, this random imposter doesn't.
Why am I so sure?
Because I witnessed one of the conversations that he posted there

>> No.8441084

>>8441037
They call it Bent Babes and they think the blind chick is the best.

>> No.8441110

It seems you dont know how sage works op

>> No.8441123

>>8441110
Seriously, it's 2012 now.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action