[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 584 KB, 850x850, 泉 こなた.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8409991 No.8409991 [Reply] [Original]

hey /jp/, is it considered pedophilia if my waifu looks like an underdeveloped preteen girl?

>> No.8409995

Is she of age?

Correct answer: Who gives a fuck.

>> No.8409996

She's 18 years old, you figure it out.

>> No.8410000

Are you >implying your waifu is Konata?
Then no, because she's not a child. She's just a little underdeveloped, but it's ephebophilia which is perfectly acceptable in modern society.

Except in I think Australia. Apparently they ban DFC porn even if the person is over 18.

>> No.8409998

yes.

>> No.8410002

>waifu

>>>/a/

>> No.8410004

Only if she is an actual 3D preteen girl.

>> No.8410009

Well no, as she isn't real.

>> No.8410019

I think so. Personally I don't find pedophilia that bad. Attraction to young girls can't be helped. It is only wrong if you carry out those intrests and molest girls under age. She's overage, so it doesn't matter. But yes, you could be considered a pedophile (at least by what I checked last time as the wikipedia definition of pedophile).

>> No.8410022

>waifu

reported

>> No.8410028
File: 51 KB, 881x761, pedophilia.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8410028

>>8410019
I don't give a damn about what some "Wikipedia" says; here's DSM-IV.

>> No.8410029

I'm sorry to say, you're a pedophile. Turn yourself in to the authorities before it's too late.

>> No.8410055

>>8410028
Can't understand this. Is he a pedophile or not?

>> No.8410059

eubiphile, wathever its called. Konata is jailbait.

>> No.8410060
File: 33 KB, 640x1441, 001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8410060

>>8410019
>>8410019
>>8410019

>> No.8410062

>>8410059
Thanks.

>> No.8410065

>>8410059
Ephebophile

>> No.8410070

>>8410060
And that's exactely the thing I'm against.

>> No.8410067

>>8410055
Actually now that I think about it, maybe. I'm assuming he meets Criterion B because he came to us and Criterion C because Global Rule 2. All that leaves is Criterion A, so it falls down to whether Konata is prepubescent or not.
Wasn't there one bit in the anime where it was kind of implied she hadn't had her first period yet?

>> No.8410069

Very strange rule for the late adolescence one + 12/13 year old.

>> No.8410072

>>8410060
So someone asking about this yesterday.
What's the story behind it, exactly?

>> No.8410076

>>8410060
What game might this be?

>> No.8410080

>>8410067
I'm confused...

>> No.8410082

>>8410076
>>8410072
>>8410070
see here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FyChQLyV4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FyChQLyV4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1FyChQLyV4

>> No.8410083

>>8410069
Yeah that really threw me off.
I have a feeling one of the guys working on the book was an intern fucking a 12-year-old and he snuck that into the manuscript so he could get away with it.

>> No.8410086

You're all retarded if you think 2D is a parameter for anything. It's not real. It's not realistic.

Trust me, I can get excited to 2D erotica with some elements I wouldn't find exciting at all were they present in 3D erotica.

>> No.8410090

>>8410086
I'd post one of those child models right here, but I've already been banned 5 times for that shit and I've finally learned my lesson!

>> No.8410098

Any "paraphilia" involving age is a flawed concept. Don't expect them to realize that before 500 years pass.

>> No.8410100

>>8410082
That's quite cute. Shame it's a bit too tongue-in-cheek.

I was kind of worried that it was one of those ZOMGCONTROVERSY games but reading the forum it seems to have been handled pretty well.
I hate how riled up some people can get over pedophilia.

>> No.8410102

>>8410086
It's a parameter for "intent", nothing else. The reason video-games aren't illegal would be because the splash-back would effect other industries like the motion pictures not to mention the musics.

>> No.8410104

>>8410082
That was... weird...

>> No.8410117

>>8410070
>>8410102

Full retarded.

>> No.8410124

>>8410117
I thought he was refering to doing that kind of thing IRL, not some fantasy thing. I don't particularly care about that.

>> No.8410128

>>8410124

It's fine, then.

>> No.8410133

Anyway, Kodus to you /jp/ for not being total moralfags on the issue and having a decent disscusion on this topic. Better than /b/ anyhow...

>> No.8410143

>>8410133
> moralfags
> /b/
Welp, time to start flinging shit at each other.

>> No.8410158

>>8410000
I had some guy from australia say that law was repealed or something and only applies in a couple of places. Not that this is important, but I thought it was an interesting bit of trivia.

>> No.8410169

>>8410133
That's why you don't bother with /b/.

You're only a pedophile if your biggest attraction is to undeveloped real girls under 10 years. If you're attracted to bit developed preteens (11~13), you're a hebephile. If you're attracted to later teens (15~18), you're an ephebophile. They must all be real. This is the only parameter you should ever trust.

You're not a pedophile for being able to like 2D loli or petite, flat-chested 2D. Don't ever believe otherwise.

>> No.8410176

hey guys

>> No.8410194

>>8410169
Yere, this seems a better place to be really. I only go on /b/ because I work fucking hard, and the shit that goes on there is easy reading and melts my brain.

/jp/ seems like a nice place, you guys should be proud.

>> No.8410212

>>8410194
This is just where most of the lolis lovers, and the handful of pedaphiles ended up.

This used to be a good board. I don't know what to think anymore.

>> No.8410213

>>8410194
it's because we relentlessly sage and suck each other's cocks

>> No.8410215

It's shitty here too, it's just that anything is better than /b/.

>> No.8410218

nope
it just means that she is a "legal" and not "true" loli

>> No.8410225

>>8410212
They're on /g/, too. It's a worksafe board with no spoiler tags, and people still lolidump once every couple days.

Oh, those loligaggers.

>> No.8410232

Everyone in that series looks underaged, you can't really judge.

>> No.8410240

8410090
You got it backwards.

>> No.8410262

>>8410254
You could still see pedo discussions on one of the pedo ".onion" forums

>> No.8410271

>>8410262
There's a difference between watching something becuase it's there, and actually seeking it out.

Besides, with SOPA on the way, I know to stay far away from TOR which is just a giant honeypot.

>> No.8410356

That was one hell of a deleted post. Can't even find it in the archives.

>> No.8410363

>>8410356
What don't they want you to know, anon?

>> No.8410366

I have no idea. Just wanted to see what was written in >>8410254. Maybe he misquoted.

>> No.8410447

>>8410366
he said he enjoyed reading /b/ pedos discuss pedoshit "but that was a few years ago"

>> No.8410460
File: 14 KB, 381x250, 1319091589290.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8410460

>>8409991
>hey /jp/, is it considered pedophilia if my waifu looks like an underdeveloped preteen girl?

Not at all. That doesn't mean you would... well, you know. Unless you would. Then you are one.

Anyway, what's with you and your stupid waifus? Don't you get tired of having a romantic dinner with a drawing on a flat, cold screen? I didn't believe in love before, /jp/. I didn't, until... well, something changed. An unforeseen change.

It still exist somewhere. Trust me, is not that bad if you find someone you can rely on.

>> No.8410480

>>8410460
>Trust me, is not that bad if you find someone you can rely on.
Nah dude.Nah.Just nah.
If you are happy with this then it's nice for you, but people here have many good reasons to prefer 2D.
For some people fantasies are enough

>> No.8410512

>>8410460
Love breaks through all dimensions.

>> No.8411018

>>8410512
Except for the fourth. I still haven't fallen in love with someone who hasn't been born yet.

>> No.8411105

>>8409991

Wouldn't matter to me if it was.

>> No.8411115

>>8411018
You're still operating under the assumption that the fourth dimension is time? Did you time travel here from a 50s sci-fi serial or something?
Learn to 11-dimensional M-theory.

>> No.8412711
File: 31 KB, 252x241, 1326515888883.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8412711

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action