[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   

File: 1.89 MB, 2000x1172, 1316796199241.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8122635 No.8122635 [Reply] [Original]

You can't censor their love.

>> No.8122638
File: 484 KB, 1000x1000, vampire end.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.8122642
File: 966 KB, 2000x1172, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Get this excessively lewd shit out of here.

>> No.8122645
File: 77 KB, 600x484, 8108071_m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I like lolis, I like incest, I like Remi, and I like Flan. But for some reason I can't stand the shipping of or any yuri implications between Flan and Remi.

They're sisters on good terms, that's it.

>> No.8122650

that's gross

>> No.8122663


>> No.8122661

Sibling love is the best kind of love.

>> No.8122664

Girls touching is creepy and unnatural as fuck.

>> No.8122682

>You can't censor their love.


>> No.8122688

Why would I want to censor nice, non-sexual sisterly love?

>> No.8122689

> 4chan Expert (has written a book about 4chan)
> a book
> not 1+ books
> 4chan Expert

>> No.8122702
File: 339 KB, 666x985, db85b578e5a3c4660c267ceb3a618a18.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

By whose text art thou making a reference to?

>> No.8122704

>Nail polish


>> No.8122718
File: 2.19 MB, 1800x2100, 22910180.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I love the little lady

>> No.8122728

That image is fascinating, and I don't know why.

>> No.8122738

Stop embarrassing yourself.

>> No.8122743
File: 346 KB, 872x1024, 2386105.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.8122750
File: 14 KB, 173x182, 1288259303431.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>> No.8122768
File: 237 KB, 1000x900, 570e7730858b048c6cbc1ade6b22f9a0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I don't like how the artist gave Sakuya such an androgynous face. She's a beautiful and proper woman.

>> No.8122772

Androgyny is perfection. All humans should be androgynous.

>> No.8122777
File: 976 KB, 870x1200, fb49fcd1e9d943e0dff5f0e520ec8881.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Only if they had a neutral gender too.
I'd prefer to know what i'm up against.
My apologies, I didn't know I had an image to uphold.

>> No.8122778
File: 182 KB, 720x951, 1297297017198.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]


Like so?

>> No.8122785 [DELETED] 
File: 47 KB, 800x534, 1321504113133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>neutral gender
My dream.
That's a manly man with a "wig". An androgynous person is more like this.

>> No.8122787


>> No.8122792

Is that Justin Beiber?

>> No.8122797


So, a faggot?

>> No.8122799 [DELETED] 
File: 34 KB, 600x560, 131727055736.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

He looks nothing like Justin Bieber.
Not necessarily.

>> No.8122802

There is no way a guy who is 18 or older can look like this.

>> No.8122806


Stop posting underaged gays, you underage gay.

>> No.8122805

Why the fuck do you save these pictures? He isn't even wearing pretty dresses.

>> No.8122809

Your dream is for everybody to look like a soulless asshole with dead stares?

>> No.8122812
File: 499 KB, 717x1000, 1316231950461.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Androgyny is beautiful.

>> No.8122813 [DELETED] 
File: 85 KB, 600x450, itsmylife1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

This is because we live in a shitty, imperfect, corrupt world full of hormones.
Because they're beautiful.
As I said, they aren't necessarily gay.
What the fuck are you talking about?

>> No.8122824

Just report it as CP. The boy in that photo is obviously naked.

>> No.8122830

You can be shirtless without being naked. Nudity isn't porn, anyway.

>> No.8122835


You've elevated effeminate shota to some sort of aesthetic ideal to try to cope with your nascent homosexuality.

Just go suck a cock, dude. You'll feel better.

>> No.8122840
File: 1.46 MB, 2480x1754, 54d62f436f14c1e8a7141fc5f5bfbad7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Sorry theres nothing neutral about those.
They're quite obviously boys.
Just admit you're a filthy boylover.

>> No.8122845

Are you a wizard/psychologist?

>> No.8122849 [DELETED] 
File: 158 KB, 483x457, vc1549.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

No, I don't care whether it's male or female, kid or adult. It doesn't matter as long as they look like both genders. It just so happens that young boys tend to be the best at it.
If you dressed them like a girl, they would easily pass as one. They are androgynous. It's only their style that is manly in those pictures.

>> No.8122850

Please stop posting CP stars.

>> No.8122853


Self-admitted pederast. Reported directly to WT Snacks via IRC.

>> No.8122857
File: 358 KB, 723x1023, 22579425.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Why bother idolizing children that take the time to style their hair every morning but can still be insufferable shits? Oh, you're a deluded pedophile, that's why.

>> No.8122861
File: 367 KB, 743x867, 1295976670143.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Snacks isn't even in IRC right now, you fool.

Also what this guy said >>8122850

>> No.8122862 [DELETED] 
File: 125 KB, 420x573, freakyfriday008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

As far as I know, they are models and normal kids taking pictures of themselves, not CP stars.
No, I never said that. I just love androgyny.
I admit that their personality is probably awful. It's their beauty that I'm fascinated by.

>> No.8122866 [DELETED] 

There isn't anything beautiful about these kids.

>> No.8122868

There isn't anything beautiful about 3D.

>> No.8122867

I disagree. What's your ideal of beauty?

>> No.8122918

you don't need to fuckin adopt them just because you like a picture

>> No.8122920

Samefaggot is a faggot.

>> No.8122921

3D can be pretty. Faggot little boys aren't though.

>> No.8122923
File: 50 KB, 500x666, RYAN_ROSS_AGaIN_by_PanicAtTheDisco13.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>little boys
Please don't say "little boys", it makes me feel uncomfortable. Use "young boys", instead. And as I said, they aren't necessarily fags. I've seen plenty of faggy-looking adult men fucking women.

>> No.8122925

>Please don't say "little boys", it makes me feel uncomfortable. Use "young boys", instead.
You need to embrace who you are, not try to rationalize yourself away with meaningless semantic games.

>> No.8122924

got any pictures of androgynous boys wearing girls' clothing?

>> No.8122928

>Please don't say "little boys", it makes me feel uncomfortable. Use "young boys", instead.
>Please don't call me a "Con Man", I am a "Con Artist".
You are a pedophile, do not deny it.

>> No.8122930

>Please don't say "little boys", it makes me feel uncomfortable.
So you're fond of the precocius BIGGER kids, huh? Go away, whore.

>> No.8122933
File: 111 KB, 800x535, 129530099965.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

No, I don't. Sorry.
As I already said, I don't really care about age and gender, as long as they are androgynous, and old enough (about 9+).

>> No.8122936

Sorry, I only regard people as people instead of objects. It's a serious problem I have.

>> No.8122937

If you're planning to further spread these disturbing images will you please kindly use a name so I can filter you? Thanks.

>> No.8122940

You have serious problems if the sight of boys disturb you.

>> No.8122942

Well, this thread went from a perfectly good start to 3DPD trash. What a shame.

>> No.8122945

He's obviously a closet pedophile.

>> No.8122946

I merely pointed that since you're pretty much derailing the thread.

>> No.8122950

And you should ask that question to yourself. Only a faggot is willing to save those pics.

>> No.8122952

I'm not a faggot. I'm actually pansexual with a fixation on androgyny.

>> No.8122953

Maybe he gets sickened at the sight of people. So would you please consider his feelings? Not the right board for that crap.

>> No.8122955

Good for you. Point is: Its fine if you like sexually ambiguous boys, we don't. Stop posting them.

>> No.8122957

>we don't
Speak for yourself.

>> No.8122959

Didn't I just tell you that its fine if you do?

>> No.8122964

My point was that just because you don't, doesn't mean that I'm the only person on /jp/ who does like them.

>> No.8122968

My point is that you're in the minority, and you should figure and should have already known /jp/'s general feelings towards 3D

>> No.8122971

Since when is /jp/ Androgynous Boys/General?

>> No.8122978
File: 134 KB, 923x866, fb2d34d98680575b601c039666b4b809.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

There, better?

>> No.8122979
File: 10 KB, 176x154, remi teapot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>This thread

>> No.8122983
File: 30 KB, 253x380, point.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Nice point, but check this one out.

>> No.8122987

See? That wasn't so hard, was it?

>> No.8122992

Why haven't his posts been deleted yet?

>> No.8122996
File: 47 KB, 350x560, 1314499533472.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

It's not hard, but it's really meaningless. It's very easy to just draw an androgyne character. It doesn't actually show the human potential like my 3D pictures do.

>> No.8122997

You really don't belong here, then.

>> No.8123032
File: 37 KB, 2000x1172, censored.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Fixed for me.