That's it. Japan is finally over. ;_;

[Anonymous No.]

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2011/04/2011411233913766598.html

[Anonymous No.]

blowout soon fellow otaku!

[Anonymous No.]

You get your news from Aljazeera?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215142
>He doesn't get his new from Aljazeera

[Anonymous No.]

>aljazeera complex
No, no. Don't mind me, I'm just shitposting above shitpost because of autism. Don't reply to this.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215146
Not the guy you quoted by I prefer not to listen to a station owned by an oil rich dictator.

[Anonymous No.]

Japanese are the ultimate victim whores.

This is nowhere near the same level as Chernobyl. They just want be a pitiful people. Yet, I can't help but feel that America has been enabling this sort of behavior ever since occupation.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215142
Maybe he got the news from somewhere else, who knows. He still bothered to link to a reliable and trustworthy source however, so who cares where he got it from.

[Anonymous No.]

I refuse to read an article about Fukushima if it is not written by a nuclear physicist, fucking reporters don't even know how the plant even fucking works, it really pisses me off.

>causing massive damage.

Well, gee, that sounds so reliable.

[Anonymous No.]

Fun fact: Al Jazeera is owned by one of the nastiest pro American thugs in the entire galaxy, the Emir of Qatar.

[Anonymous No.]

If you guys actually gave it a chance you would see that it's much better than the jokes that are Fox News and now CNN.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215183
Something like this?
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/nuclear-panel-japan-0136.html

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215201

BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT... MUSLIMS!

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215176
That's because there was no Russian mass media comparable to today's to broadcast victim whoring.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215204

Exactly that.

Seriously, if you're not getting your information out of the MIT News Office, then you're a stupid piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215214

I listen to NPR and the BBC World Service.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215122
Something else I would like to point out.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215249

And why aren't the news showing this chart to the people, why won't they educate them instead of saying, "Radiation is higher than it should be".

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215264
Basically the news media is masturbating themselves vigorously over the idea of a lot of people dying a horrible death. The fact that it won't happen makes them mad

[Anonymous No.]

>>7215276

Well fuck that, things like this makes you seriously consider if Free Press is the right way.

When will a Scientocracy/Technocracy be established? The world would be a much better place.

[Anonymous No.]

probably a bad news source but
http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/news/110412/dst11041211040017-n1.htm
福島原発事故、最悪「レベル７」と発表　チェルノブイリ並み

this really isn't quite as bad as chernobyl, but regardless of whether it is that bad or not the current state of affairs makes it seem like the people who were claiming "it's physically impossible that anything bad could happen" were about as accurate as the media they were speaking against. unless they don't consider anything of what's happened to be a "problem," i suppose they're absolutely right then.

oh well, what can you expect from 4chan pro-vs-anti arguments. everybody just wants to think/show they know better than the other side.

not that i'm anti or pro nuclear, i'm just an idiot and have a philosophy that idiots should avoid decisions on issues like these.