[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture

View post   
  [?]In ghost mode, only threads with non-archived posts will be shown
File: 358 KB, 719x720, 0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189087 No.7189087 [Reply] [Original]

Okay /jp/ please don't troll me, this is a srs topic.

I want to marry my waifu. Like, for real, I want us to be registered as a married couple and be able to put her name on the front door, etc. I want her to be legally recognised as my wife.

Is this possible? So long as I can have her say "I do" in some form (I'm thinking text) it should be okay no?

thx

>> No.7189092

>>>/a/

>> No.7189093
File: 3 KB, 211x228, 1206802616053.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189093

>>7189087
Swap the colors and try again.

>> No.7189096

>>7189092

But I am not a fan of those faggots in /a/ who treat their affections as a joke. I am the deadliest of deadly srs.

>> No.7189098
File: 16 KB, 294x212, pillowboy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189098

>>7189087
>Is this possible?
It is. In Korea.

>> No.7189095

>>>/losers/

LOL

>> No.7189143

Hey, it's happened before:

http://boingboing.net/2009/11/24/footage-from-the-fir.html

>> No.7189157

>>7189096
Anonymous is that...sarcasm? that I'm detecting from you? Now that's not very nice, is it.

>> No.7189215
File: 119 KB, 1440x810, 1301937591353.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189215

>>7189157

No anon, I am very serious. I don't feel like what I've done so far is enough. She needs to know that I'm serious about our relationship. I am just worried that there will be some legal guideline that makes this impossible.

>> No.7189241
File: 177 KB, 719x720, 1302017252100.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189241

>>7189087
Like this anon?

>> No.7189255

Simple answer is no.
Long answer is yes.
You can not just go in and get married to anything. If you would like to be married to your pillow you would basically have to have a court hearing and pay out your ass to convince people that you are really in love with the item, but I bet you would be ridiculed for your pure love. It is possible, but not very feasible.

>> No.7189283

>>7189255
This ezactly. It's not worth going through the trouble of doing it and I doubt you'd have the cash to support it either. You'd also become world famous as a giant pervert etc. Don't bother, this society does not accept you or your waifu, why should you ask for acceptance from their church?

>> No.7189287

>>7189255

So basically any slutty insincere teenage couple can get married at will even though they'll divorce the next year, while I am devoted to my waifu for life and can't have our bond consummated because some people happen to find it weird.

Normalfags are just lovely.

>> No.7189295

>>7189287
That's because marriage is something only normalfags appreciate

>> No.7189302
File: 111 KB, 1440x810, 1302019742978.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189302

>>7189215
really?

>> No.7189315

>>7189287
There is no reason you need to be married to be faithful. If I could marry a pillow I would, then I would receive a shit ton of money since I'm military.

Basically only the male version of lady gaga would try to do this. It will harbor all sorts of peoples views and nothing else.

>> No.7189343
File: 135 KB, 500x375, serious-cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189343

>>7189087

>> No.7189346

Just give up if you aren't living in Japan, Korea of other asian country.
By the way, who's your waifu?

>> No.7189358

>>7189096
If you need marriage to prove your affection, then it is a joke.

>> No.7189373
File: 517 KB, 900x750, 6047196.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189373

>>7189346

Ran

>> No.7189377

I don't see why you should care what the law has to say about your relationship.

>> No.7189411

>>7189287
>>So basically any slutty insincere teenage couple can get married at will even though they'll divorce the next year, while I am devoted to my waifu for life and can't have our bond consummated because some people happen to find it weird.

The difference here is that those teenagers actually exist, whereas your "waifu" does not. Are you following me here? The teenagers are human beings and (as long as they're over 18) are free to enter into contracts. Your "waifu," on the other hand, is not alive, is not a person, and cannot enter into a contract (such as marriage). Your "waifu" is an artificial and imaginary construct; to "marry" it would be like "marrying" a clump of dirt or a car or a movie, and would certainly mark you as a drooling retard.

>> No.7189436

Silly Anon, you can't marry a concept, a waifu is just the concept of all the things you desire in a partner.

The best thing you can do is try your hardest to find and woo a girl of flesh and blood who matches it the most.

>> No.7189454

>>7189287
>>I am devoted to my waifu for life and can't have our bond consummated because some people happen to find it weird.

No, you can't have your bond consummated because it's impossible for you to do so. Consummation does not refer to marriage; it refers to sex. As you cannot have sex with something that doesn't exist, you cannot consummate your bond with your "waifu."

>> No.7189468
File: 123 KB, 1024x768, 36f6dbc83642b8b473bfc3761f38e40d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189468

>>7189411

No, friend, my waifu does exist. You are confusing existence with consciousness. If my waifu did not "exist" we could not speak about her right now. Do you follow? Non-existence means there is literally nothing. Are you saying we are talking about nothing?

As for "artificial and imaginary"... meh. People in relationships often make out their partners to be someting that they're not. Is that not "imaginary" and "artificial"? You don't ever get to know someone 100%, there will always be a made-up element. It's just I can be content with the whole deal being "imaginary".

But then I wouldn't honestly expect you to understand, normalfriend.

>> No.7189474

This image (0.png filename and everything) is only posted when starting a shitthread like this one.
You should at least mix it up a bit, OP.

>> No.7189478

I admire your love, but in the end marriage is only something with significance given to it by society.
If you truly love her, you don't need it.
Have a small ceremony of your own. If you both agree, then isn't it fine?

By going against society and loving a waifu you should already be prepared to have to do some 'society' things differently or forego them altogether.

>> No.7189483

>>7189454

when two ideas/paradigms meet, new ideas can be born from that union

unfortunately, it's rare for a human being to personify an idea, since we are more like idea machines (input output)

for example, the idea of your "waifu" that was fed into you resulted in you creating the idea that your "waifu" is a loyal faithful female

others might receive the same idea and conclude that she is a rapeslut who wants to be gangraped until her mind breaks

>> No.7189501

>>7189478
I'm not going to do anything like that. I don't need some stupid celebration to know that my waifu is mine.

>> No.7189510

>>7189468

Nice try.

1. Yes, we are talking about nothing. While an abstract idea ("a character called...") exists the character itself has no physical substance and no reality.
2. People in relationships who make out their partners to be someting that they're not are engaging in wishful thinking. They're not imagining the existence of their partners; nor does this type of behavior have much to do with the artificiality you seek to embrace. Your argument here has no merit.
3. I understand quite well. You're a drooling retard -- granted, you're able to explain your obsessions better than most of your ilk, but the fact remains.

>> No.7189526

>>7189483

Replying to the wrong post? If not, WTF are you going on about? I was merely pointing out that OP was misusing the word "consummate." This whole bit of yours has zero relevance to that.

>> No.7189536
File: 69 KB, 533x800, ranfig.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189536

>>7189510

>Yes, we are talking about nothing.

She still exists. Even if it's just as a character, she exists. Are you familiar with the phrase "esse est percipi"?
>While an abstract idea ("a character called...") exists

"A person called..."

What is a "personality" but a bunch of abstract ideas? (note a synonym of "personality is actually "character")

>the character itself has no physical substance and no reality.

She can to some extent. Pic related. More than enough for me.

>> No.7189581

>>7189087
But do you lover her so much that you would love her even if she were a guy?
I mean if you love her so much gender shouldn't matter right?

>> No.7189587

>>7189536
Please don't feed the trolls.

>> No.7189605

OP, your waifu is not real. marrying her where she is real is possible, get an artist to draw the two of you being married, in the 2D world, done. Why are you trying to force 3D realities unto your 2D waifu? You are 3D, but she is 2D, if you truly loved her, you would give up 3D and live in the 2D world. Get rich and hire an artist to draw your day to day lives. Live through the 2D medium. You can do it, unlike her, she cant become 3D for you.

>> No.7189627

>>7189536

Twisting words and concepts around doesn't help your case -- it merely demonstrates your hopelessness.

1. The idea of the fictional construct has existence but the fictional construct itself does not. To argue otherwise is insanity.
2. The coincidence of the words "personality" and "character" being synonyms (in one narrow sense, and not at all in others) is completely irrelevant. It's like saying that "rock" means both a type of music and a stone, therefore a rock always equals music.
3. Sorry, but the character has no physical substance or reality at all. A picture (or doll, or sculpture) of something is not that thing. It is a representation -- nothing more, nothing less. Can I take a picture of a dollar bill and buy something with it?

In the end, why do you try to justify what can't be justified? Enjoy your stupid obsession, but do the rest of the world a favor and keep your stupidity to yourself. It's quite tiresome.

>> No.7189636

>>7189587

You have no idea what "troll" means, do you?

>> No.7189640
File: 44 KB, 650x500, 00000307.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189640

This is certainly an interesting read.

>> No.7189691

>>7189627

So doing what you enjoy is "stupid" because... you say it's stupid. Well, sure, I'll happily continue being stupid then.

Key word being happily.

>> No.7189736

>>7189636
I'm feeding one right now.

>> No.7189741

>>7189691

Please do so. There's no reason for you to stop doing what you like. Just don't burden other people with it, and don't let it influence your thinking to such a degree that you seriously entertain insane concepts like those you put into your original post. Follow this advice and you -- and those around you -- will be much, much happier.

>> No.7189748

>>7189736

No, you're acting like a spoiled little child who can't stand being left out of the adults' conversations.

>> No.7189749

>>7189748
Case in point.

>> No.7189774
File: 10 KB, 200x250, 122134761513.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7189774

>>7189143
>YEAH U HEAR THAT JAPS
>YOUR GOING TO END THE HUMAN RACE

Lol wow.

>> No.7189798

i wanted to at least marry mine on facebook but i can't add someone who doesn't have a facebook account nor have multiple wives/girfriends even though you may be in an open relationship (which is fucking stupid IMO)...

>> No.7190008

>>7189087
>Is this possible?
Well, it depends on your country tolerance etc., obviously. Most countries won't allow it, I believe.
>Why?
It's better sometimes to thinks plainly about things...
Well, basically, "marriage" is a word that refers to a couple of humans of opposite gender who intend to create social union/family.
That's why humans normally won't tolerate things like gay and virtual marriages etc that infuse word "marriage" with nonorthodox sense.
You'd expect resistance if you try to change something that was formed millenniums ago, at the very dawn the humanity...

>> No.7190033

>>7189798
Make her a FB account then.

>> No.7190046

>>7189798

>facebook

>>>/soc/

>> No.7190055
File: 91 KB, 301x267, 1301847912605.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7190055

After taking into account what /jp/ has said about this I have come to the realisation that it would make no sense for me to try to force normalfag conventions onto my waifu when our relationship itself is a digression from normalfaggotry.

Apples and oranges.

Thank you for your considerations, /jp/.

>> No.7190061

>>7190055

If it matters any, I wish you both the best.

>>7190008
"Millenia"

>> No.7190071

>>7190055

Also, consider being in love with something that doesn't 'exist' is also an ancient, ancient practice for mankind. It is called religion. So no, you are not as weird as you think.

>> No.7190079

>>7190071

Well, when that other guy was around earlier I was going to mention that his characterisation of 2D love as being in love with an "abstract idea with no physical body" sounds exactly the same as love for Godor Jesus (okay he has a canon IRL body but how many Christians have seen it) or whoever, but I didn't want to turn this into a religion shitstorm...

>> No.7190081

>>7190071
It's perfectly normal to have an imaginary friend that you think is real, but not to have one that you know isn't real.

What sort of fucked up world is this?

>> No.7190090

>>7190079

Wow. a proper use of sage'ing. That's a first. Gratz, Anon.

Well, unfortunately, the similarities are too big to ignore it. Fortunately, OP's all about love, not killing people for his beliefs. So, I'm very supportive of it.

Also, the whole Gensokyo thing is _very_ similar to a religion to me as well. But, also, in a good way.

>> No.7190094

>>7190090
At first religion was meant to be good too.
But then people started to abused it.

That can happen to Gensokyo too.

>> No.7190097

>>7190090

Please excuse my stupid english. it's not my native language, and sometimes I can't express my arguments properly, especially when I reply fast. I hope you get the meaning behind it.

>> No.7190104

>>7190094

I know. That's why I enjoy it now that it is still pure. Hopefully, it will stay this way.

>> No.7190145

Woah. Interesting discussion. I do not agree with OP, she doesn't exist, but I still support him on whatever he wants to do. We all told you that it would be too troublesome to want really marry her, but you can try other things, like this anon said: >>7189605
You "gave up" on marrying, but you still can have some kind of event or something like that.

>>
Reply to thread [?]Don't expect anything heroic. Your post will not be uploaded to the original board.
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action