[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 150 KB, 853x965, 1296671131629.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7153027 No.7153027 [Reply] [Original]

>According to a press release issued this morning http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/8/prweb424020.htm, an engineer working within the private AET RaDAL group has produced an increase in gravity during a free fall drop in many orders of magnitude beyond the controversial results released by the European Space Agency earlier this year.

>Marshall Barnes, a R&D engineer who has developed an electromagnetic field process that seems to increase gravity while in motion, conducted the tests which were video taped, and plans to release at least one of them to the Internet later on this month. According to the press release from the ESA http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2006/3/emw364473.php, their results, which were produced by a superconducting disk rotating at 6,500 RPMs, were measured by special sensors that indicated that a gravitomagnetic field was being produced outside of the disk and was measured at "one hundred millionths" of the Earth's gravity. By contrast, the results from the STDTS gravity experiments were on the order of 1.117 of the Earth's gravity. This was clearly determined because of frame by frame analysis of the video tape which showed the test rig being dropped. The frame count didn't begin until one frame before the test rig was completely released.

>The STDTS effect is created by a specially synthesized electromagnetic field that seems to warp or contract space as it moves. According to an AET RaDAL representative, the gravity test was derived from a suggestion for conducting ballistics tests with the STDTS by chemist Robert Lohman at a conference in late May, where earlier video suggesting the STDTS effect is propellantless propulsion, was presented. Earlier that same month, five high school physics classes were given the opportunity to analyze the raw footage from the same experiment. They concluded that there was a propulsion effect evident. The classes were supervised by physics instructor Craig Kramer.

>> No.7153028
File: 495 KB, 1000x1000, 1296671435624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7153028

Most of the gravity tests were from a height of around 8ft. and it took 19 frames of video for the test rig to impact after it was dropped during the controlled versions of the tests. However, with the STDTS engaged, the frame count was 1.5 frames to 2 frames shorter, depending on how much power was applied. The only difference between the controlled tests and the activated ones was whether the STDTS technology was turned on or off. Nothing else was altered.

When contacted about a projected date for the release of the video, a AET RaDAL representative indicated that it is most likely that a clip will be released during Labor Day weekend. The video clip will include one control drop and one test drop, followed by the frame by frame analysis of both. It was communicated that the frame by frame analysis not only indicates a variance between the two test results but also that the video has not been tampered with.

"It's clear that each drop begins at the same point, it's clear that there is continuous movement during each drop, and it is also clear when each drop ends."

There is a plan for AET RaDAL to have a special presentation for representatives for the aviation industry, sometime within the next few weeks. The purpose is to introduce them to the research that is being conducted so to better facilitate the implementation of the STDTS technology in the aviation industry as soon as it becomes tested and approved for aircraft. There is a proposed schedule already in place that positions testing for aircraft to begin later in 2007. The STDTS will save fuel costs due to its projected ability to make a plane fly faster without using additional fuel. The result will be less time spent in the air, which will translate into less fuel used to travel.

>> No.7153041

tl;dr

>> No.7153050

Sounds like a perpetual motion type of scam. You know, claim a scientific breakthrough, get investors, but show no one.
And then you add the fact that this was in 2006 and with no followup, then it becomes shady at best.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action