/jp/ - Otaku Culture

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

Ararara~

[Anonymous No.]

That's okay. I also jacked off thinking of a boy.

[Anonymous No.]

That actually makes me very happy.

[Anonymous No.]

That's gross.

[Anonymous No.]

We were in the same bed. I hope so.

[Anonymous No.]

Ew.

[wtH !hWtHG71Z1c No.]

HELL yeah OP, I'm pretty decent...at least 3 girls I had a crush on prolly did. but since they all got boyfriends and one of them got preggers they'ire all fucking sluts

[Anonymous No.]

Since I have cybersex with men all the time I don't doubt it

[Anonymous No.]

Being straight, this still pleases me. Very much so.

[Anonymous No.]

Does it still count if it's online and they think I'm a 14 year old girl?

[Necrobrotent No.]

Yeah Beau told me in detail about how rousing my performance was in Cyrano De Bergerac.

But Just because the gay is widespread doesn't make it /jp/ related.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014213
I fap to the thought of this.

[wtH !hWtHG71Z1c No.]

Oh boy...boy HELL no
And I'm taking my comment with me

[Anonymous No.]

I don't think this is true...

Maybe who I was pretending to be, but not me myself...

[Anonymous No.]

Oh wow. I never even thought of that. I wouldn't be surprised if it never happened though.

[Anonymous No.]

/jp/, I have a proposal.
Let's fap to the thought of each other.

[DESU !LSUJDHu/Og No.]

I highly doubt that.

Highly.

[Anonymous No.]

what

um... no

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014261
I'm fapping to you right now, anon.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014261

I've given up fapping. You guys can do it to each other though.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014283
>>7014285
*fapfapfap*

[Anonymous No.]

Hm, I wonder if anyone on /jp/ is morally opposed to the gay

I'd imagine everyone is pretty open minded but you get some surprises

[Anonymous No.]

That's uh... kinda disturbing

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014293
I don't particularly like it. I'd rather everyone were straight and girls outnumbered men 20 to 1 but personal preferences aside they can be okay people and If they keep it to themselves they're more than welcome to their perversions.

I mean I'll never have my harem end, but for every man that goes gay I get a little closer.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014293

People can fuck whatever they want, but gay people shouldn't be allowed to be married.

[Anonymous No.]

Some mixed gay kid at my high school told me I was cute. So I suppose him masturbating while thinking of me is a possibility

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014317
What, why? Why should you get to say if two people can get married or not?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014317
Well as far as the governmental perks they should get those but as far as christian ceremonies go its like kicking the religion in the teeth.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014317
kill yourself

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014331
You have gay christians though

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014342
Yeah but the devout bible types kind of follow that No being gay god said so rule.

I mean if they want to have their own sect that ignores that fine by me, Just don't go to catholic church and expect them not to have a fucking moo moo.

[Anonymous No.]

How about we just get rid of state sanctioned marriages and you can all have whatever shitty little ceremony you damn well feel like?

In any case you shouldn't get a tax break for being a faggot nor should the government use a convoluted tax code to push social engineering,

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014324

One man, one woman. It's been that way since the beginning of time, regardless of religion. Why do gay people want to change that?

>>7014331

Why should the government give benefits and tax breaks to those that can't have kids to raise and contribute to society? It's silly.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014213

I doubt it. There are plenty of better looking people for guys to think about.

[Anonymous No.]

But I have no identity. My face was burned off in my childhood due to a frying pan accident.

[Anonymous No.]

I doubt that.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014379
>One man, one woman. It's been that way since the beginning of time, regardless of religion.

How retarded are you? Marriage has existed in loads of alternate forms for centuries, not just the sanitised christian version of the last thousand years. There's no reason it shouldn't change for the times

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014331
>as far as christian ceremonies go its like kicking the religion in the teeth.
Give me one reason why I should care about offending a bunch of deluded fucks with the most mind-knowingly stupid views on sexuality, and indeed, everything else in the world. I don't want to kick religion in the teeth, I want to beat it in the face with a two-by-four filled with rusty nails, douse it with gasoline, and drag its flaming corpse behind my truck. And good riddance.

Nobody on earth should have to cater to religion, ever.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014379
>One man, one woman. It's been that way since the beginning of time, regardless of religion.

>In the southern Chinese province of Fujian, through the Ming dynasty period, females would bind themselves in contracts to younger females in elaborate ceremonies.

HERPY DERPY DOO

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014379
PEOPLE WITH KIDS ARE MORE OF A FUCKING DRAIN ON SOCIETY.

FUCKING PEOPLE WITH A BROOD ON WELFARE DON'T FUCKING HELP THE ECONOMY.

THAT BROOD IS GOING TO GROW UP AND DO THE SAME SHIT AND ITS GOING TO SPREAD SHIT EVERYWHERE.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014396
>Nobody on earth should have to cater to religion, ever.
.
We don't but we want to. Religion makes things that are hard to understand, a bit more easier to let go. It's not like people in underdeveloped nations can afford science research or education in the first place.

[Anonymous No.]

That's probable.
In fact, I'm pretty sure I know exactly when it happened.

[Anonymous No.]

inb4 200 posts having nothing to do with the topic

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014387
There's a fetish for everything, anon-chan （　≖◡≖）

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014396
Preach it brother! - wait, that sounds wrong somehow....

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014403
Don't even get me started on the ancient Romans.

Regardless, we are obviously responding to a troll. There is no one on 4chan who actually believes this, let alone on /jp/. Still, it's generating insightful if off-topic discussion.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014379
It's not like they can adopt or anything. Being gay is not something you choose, you should not be punished for it.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014413
The topic was gay anyway.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014396

Hey, dumbfuck.

Should a father and daughter be allowed to get married?

[Anonymous No.]

Some gay kid in high school wanted to confess his love to me. Good thing he didn't do it directly because I'm not gay. That's was pretty damn weird though.

Well at least SOMEBODY like me ;__;

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014425
Why the fuck do you care if a father or daughter should or should not get married? Are you going to cry in horror if it happens somewhere? Grow up.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014425
What does that have to do with anything?

There are pretty fucking basic reasons why that's a bad idea

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014420

Marriage is a privilege, not a right. 99% of this board will remain single virgins, is the government punishing them?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014425
one, that has nothing to do with religion

two, if the daughter is an adult, and there is no evidence of abuse in the past, then yes. If they want kids they should probably adopt or find a sperm donor or something, though

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014431

LOL FUCK ALL MORALS ANARCHY IS THE WAY TO BE

>>7014432

Now what if the father is infertile?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014437
No but your number crunching skills are.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014443
>LOL FUCK ALL MORALS ANARCHY IS THE WAY TO BE

That's a pretty big jump. Do you normally ignore the opposing argument and just rant?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014430
You should have hooked up with him anyway. It was probably your only chance at a relationship.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014443
>Now what if the father is infertile?

Then I think it's still pretty messed up, then again I'm not them so I shouldn't get to say anything about it

[Anonymous No.]

/jp/- bullshit

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014432
>There are pretty fucking basic reasons why that's a bad idea

O rly? and what would those be?

[Anonymous No.]

What if the father is in love with the daughter and vice versa?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014465
>O rly? and what would those be?

You seriously cannot be this stupid

[Anonymous No.]

Honestly, if you're a femanon this is basically guaranteed.

How does that make you femanons feel?

Would you ever be part of a bukkake circle?

Do you fantasize to rape?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014458
>>7014443
what does infertility have to do with anything?
people form relationships and get married for many reasons besides procreation, and we have this little thing called "birth control" nowadays

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014432

>There are pretty fucking basic reasons why that's a bad idea

Shut the fuck up you fucking mouthbreathing Christian redneck. What the fuck are you even doing on 4chan? How dare you tell other people what they should and shouldn't be able to do with you sick, twisted morals. Go read the Bible and kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014478
Coming from someone who thinks they have enough experience with relationships to judge incest? On /jp.

0/10. Go read something on actual morals.

[Anonymous No.]

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014489
What are you on about? The bible loves father daughter incest

YOU try reading it sometime

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014489
Holy shit. Faggot alert.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014478
Produce these "reasons" and defend them (if you can), and we shall see who is stupid

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014485

>people form relationships and get married for many reasons besides procreation

why

[Anonymous No.]

Wow you guys are pathetic. Can someone please summarize what the issue is so I can wrap this up and watch it 404?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014501
People with retarded christian upbringings show up and get mad

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014501

Gay people want to redefine the definition of marriage so they can get discounts on family insurance and tax breaks.

Hardworking straight people that have children to support do not like this.

[Anonymous No.]

Marriage is for expressing your love and committing yourself to another person completely. Now how does that exclude homosexuals in any way?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014501
>Can someone please summarize what the issue is

post about male fantasies turns into more general discussion of sex and relationships and then collapses into bickering about incest between people with a brain and moralfags

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014379 One man, one woman. It's been that way since the beginning of time, regardless of religion.
Not necessarily, it's only ever been touted that way. I find that as time goes on sexuality and gender identity (keep in mind I'm including the physical body in this) is more of a spectrum then a well defined either-or.
Human categorization isn't always infallible.

>Why should the government give benefits and tax breaks to those that can't have kids to raise and contribute to society? It's silly.

With this logic, couples that choose to be childless (a popular decision in first-world countries) or couples who are unable to bear children due to fertility problems shouldn't get tax breaks either? Are you implying that quiverfull families are even _more_ deserving of tax breaks? I get it. You're breaking things down in to easy to understand absolutes to make life easier, but the world isn't as clear-cut and elegant as a math problem.

[Anonymous No.]

Homosexuality is disgusting and people who do it should be publicly stoned.

End of discussion. There is no excuse for it.

[Anonymous No.]

/jp/ - Normalfags/General

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014498
sex. companionship. love. tax breaks. immigration. because they got drunk.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014503
I don't get why people hate the bible. It's fun to read. I wouldn't believe it, but that's because I've been exposed to science related principles and evolution all my life. I think that religion has a grasp on people because it relieves the stress of having only one life by promising another.
>>7014507
Well I guess you would have to take numbers into account, but since straight families will overlap gay families by a large margin, I think you need to be a bit more lenient. Do you tie the concept of Marriage with a particular religion or is it separate from such?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014497
He'll try to produce reasons but ultimately fail miserably, because all arguments in favor of controlling relationships and sexuality are based entirely on petty morals left over from religious institutions in the dark ages. They are meaningless.

Almost everything we believe about sex today was created by religion. In other words, what a deranged 'prophet' wrote thousands of years ago is controlling who you are allowed to marry and in some cases what you are allowed to do with your body.

The world is a fucked up place, ain't it?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014379 One man, one woman. It's been that way since the beginning of time, regardless of religion.
Not necessarily, it's only ever been touted that way. I find that as time goes on sexuality and gender identity (keep in mind I'm NOT including the physical body in this) is more of a spectrum then a well defined either-or.
Human categorization isn't always infallible.

>Why should the government give benefits and tax breaks to those that can't have kids to raise and contribute to society? It's silly.

With this logic, couples that choose to be childless (a popular decision in first-world countries) or couples who are unable to bear children due to fertility problems shouldn't get tax breaks either? Are you implying that quiverfull families are even _more_ deserving of tax breaks? I get it. You're breaking things down in to easy to understand absolutes to make life easier, but the world isn't as clear-cut and elegant as a math problem.

edit - whoops forgot an important word

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014507
What about childless couples? What about useless parents that churn out hordes of kids?

Should they still get tax breaks too?

[Anonymous No.]

Other than myself, you mean?
...oh wow, that actually pleases me.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014527

>sex. companionship. love.
Don't need to be married to do that.

>tax breaks. immigration.
So basically, marriage is just a way to get free shit.

[Anonymous No.]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhIbL5-NAZc

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014497
>Produce these "reasons" and defend them (if you can), and we shall see who is stupid

50% chance of congenital birth defects resulting from inbred genetics?

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014453
ah shit, this is pretty moe. I think I may fantasize about this tonight. fuck, I love being my gender. Feels good man

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014528

They shouldn't. And if they took all those financial incentives away completely, I guarantee you gay people would no longer give a shit about marriage. It would turn into a religious ceremony.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014557
>I guarantee you gay people would no longer give a shit about marriage.

So you can instantly tell what a group of people you hate is thinking?

Wow, you must be the fucking king of empathy

[Anonymous No.]

When organisms mate too closely within family lines, they tend to make it more likely that abnormal, recessive genes will be passed on to their offspring. This means that their children are more likely to be born deformed or with other genetic related problems

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014553
That's a reason not to have kids, not a reason to not get married

[mahou shoujo meduka !meguca4YtA No.]

>>7014553
It's not 50%, it's double whatever the standard risk is, which naturally depends on the family's history.
(In most cases, this is negligible. It takes several generations for inbreeding to become a serious problem.)

That said, a father fucking his daughter is wrong for plenty of moral reasons, so don't sweat the details.

[Anonymous No.]

Damn, I just thought this thread would be a pick-me-up for lonely anons on a Friday night

I didn't realise this board had so many christfags

[Anonymous No.]

Girl here, provided you were cute enough I might date one of you guys.

[Anonymous No.]

/jp/ - Gay Culture

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014570
Guy here, provided you were cute enough you'd already have a boyfriend.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014553
>Should a father and daughter be allowed to get married?
>NOT: should a father and daughter be allowed to have children?
You fucking failed, try again.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014572
>I didn't realise this board had so many christfags

Me neither they ruin everything nice.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014554
>>sex. companionship. love.
>Don't need to be married to do that.

as I said:
>people form relationships and get married
>form relationships and

and whether you want to get married or not for those things is a personal decision.


>So basically, marriage is just a way to get free shit.
For some it is, yes. You asked why people get married or form relationships, and I gave you some of them. I didn't say they where all good or noble.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014566
> wrong for plenty of moral reasons
could be, but isn't always.

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014574
How nice that you can pick and choose the aspects of marriage to fit your answer

Protip: sex is a big part of it

[Anonymous No.]

>>7014554
>Don't need to be married to do that.
Why not? Marriage is one of life's biggest goals. Find the right person to love and (hopefully) spend a lifetime with them. Marriage is an important part of any culture. It isn't wrong to want official recognition of your commitment to someone. Why should people be denied that? Why should they be excluded from that?