[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 81 KB, 500x375, 1292743195069.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6891634 No.6891634 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.6891637

Go away.

>> No.6891646

It has been awhile since the last JBCS or JBBC thread.

>> No.6891652

Someone let a few of their lovebirds free a few years ago and now we have a couple flocks of wild lovebirds in my area. One day I found one clinging to my screendoor so I took it inside. Over the course of the next two two hours, it slowly died. I was heartbroken when it died. I was heartbroken. I thought I would have a little friend that would sing to me and a little friend I could take care of.

>> No.6891665

>>6891652

enjoy your bird flu.

>> No.6891670

>>6891652
Get a crow, they're yandere birds. They're affectionate towards people they're familiar with but when a stranger approaches their territory, especially in enclosed spaces, they will fuck shit up guaranteed. You really don't want to be on the receiving end of a crow, they're like territorial magpies but better. Stronger. Faster.

>> No.6891693

>>6891652
>took one
>one

Lovebirds get sick and die without a partner. Good job taking away its love and life.

>> No.6891696

>>6891693
The bird died of NTR

>> No.6891703

>>6891693
They die that quickly? Besides, there was only that one there.

>> No.6891704

>>6891670
Where would you get a crow? A specialty pet store? I have never been a fan of birds except for crows. After seeing some of their behaviors up close I now look at them like flying dogs.

>> No.6891705
File: 76 KB, 1280x720, chizuru.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6891705

>>6891703
face it, you murdered a cute bird

>> No.6891707

>>6891703
Well, not that quickly. I'd assume the bird was already sick when he took it in.
I can't recall what specifically makes it happen. Ive had my baby rainbow lorikeet die in my arms the same way.

>> No.6891709

...ugly

>> No.6891717

>With their inclination to bond, they can form long-term relationships with people in tandem with their intra-species companions. Aggression is easily aroused in lovebirds, however, and biting may occur unless a bond is established with gentle handling. Provided with adequate space, a stimulating environment, and appropriate nutrition, a lovebird can become a cherished companion parrot. They love to snuggle and often preen their favorite people.

>> No.6891722

>>6891717
I must have one

>> No.6891724

>>6891704
Probably, yeah. But I generally don't buy birds, since I live in bumfuck nowhere and crows are pests no one cares if I care for wild fledglings. You can try for the same. This is much easier for magpies, since magpies are pretty good at invading huge areas and raping local songbird populations you can find some no matter where you go.

>> No.6891723

>Lovebirds are not necessarily best kept in pairs, as their name suggests, although relationships with humans are then less likely to be as intense when paired. Birds kept individually or brought up hand-fed, make very good pets. However, single birds require frequent attention to stay happy, and if the owner has limited time to spend daily with a single lovebird, it is preferable to grant the lovebird a companion of the same species, or a companion of another parrot species known to get along well with lovebirds. Lovebirds can become very interactive with humans, and when comfortable, will willingly perch on a finger or shoulders.

>Determining Lovebird sex is difficult. At maturity of one year, it may show signs of whether it is male or female, such as ripping up paper and stuffing it into its feathers (female behavior) or regurgitating for its owners (male behavior: the male feeds the nesting female). This behavior is not a reliable indicator. The only sure method is DNA testing. Companies that provide such service exist.

1. Get lovebird
2. Clinging Schroedinger gender companion

>> No.6891739

>>6891709
Nice sense of beauty bro.

>> No.6891745

I have a pair of love birds, very cute indeed. They bite if I try to grab them, but they're otherwise content to perch on my finger, shoulder, or head.

I know scumbag people who get pet birds and they don't take care of them. Their birds have already died, but mine are still plenty alive. I always try to let them outside of their cage at least once a day, but it's difficult because I also have two cats. I remember I even took them to the beach once. Can you believe it? Lovebirds at the beach? That was a bit of an irresponsible stunt, but I was still a kid.

I had a third bird, but my sister killed her in a fit of rage. She slammed the door while my bird was perched on top. Just thinking about it... I cannot take it easy like this... Please don't buy birds if you think you'll take care of them in the long run or not be able to pay their bills if they become ill.

>> No.6891765

>>6891745
I am okay with cruelty to animals because we are the dominant species. We should not give a fuck about species below us, no matter how cute they are.

This is why I especially support cruelty towards birds.

>> No.6891783
File: 54 KB, 1282x722, 1296077110243.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6891783

>>6891765

>> No.6891787

>>6891765
Isn't treating animals as food and keeping them as our pets enough?

>> No.6891789

The budgie I had when I was a kid got really friendly and close to the point where I could pretty much try anything without him getting suspicious or trying to run away. Not that I'd ever have done anything bad, of course.

>> No.6891790

/jp/ - bird culture

>> No.6891794

I'm telling you, birds are the best pets for NEETs. Low cost, low maintenance, highly social, live almost as long as a dog.

>> No.6891796

>>6891787
Nope. If you buy an animal, it should be your property. Eating it, keeping it as a pet, torturing it, starving it, drowning it, dissecting it and throwing it are all okay, as is anything else.

Just as long as nobody is hurt. And by nobody I mean no humans.

>> No.6891807

>>6891796
What if I didn't buy it, but still claim ownership?

>> No.6891808

>>6891796
Why not extend the same such rights to human slaves? I honestly see nothing wrong with your statement aside from the rather childish exclusion of humans in the rationale.

>> No.6891844

>>6891807
It would depend on what type of property you encountered it on. Nobody would detest you taking ownership of a stick found in public, the same should go for an animal. As long as it does not have some prior owner who still wishes to have that right.

>>6891808
Humans are the ones who own property, the only ones who can't be property themselves. That's because they are not the inferior species. There may be inferior and superior humans, but that all depends on the scale used. A difference is not easy to discern objectively, and that gap would hardly account for the rights of ownership over the lesser one compared the enormous gap between humans and another species. The one who sold the human owned the human as much as the human owned him.

>> No.6891849
File: 376 KB, 1024x1280, c9062699a4ebd31544602c020cf519ec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6891849

>>6891704
get a a parrot they are better than crows and yes they are extremely yandere birds.

my grandma's parrot almost ripped my finger off when i hugged her.

>> No.6895328
File: 6 KB, 218x252, japanesebirdbeingRAD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6895328

RAD

>> No.6895349

>>6891844
Nope. Superior human beings(Myself, for example) should be able to maim and kill whatever peasantry walks in our way. You're a slave if you consider otherwise.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action