[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 145 KB, 710x736, yuri inazuma.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780652 No.6780652 [Reply] [Original]

How can anyone enjoy a work where the principle females are not chaste virgins?

It boggles the mind.

>> No.6780659

How can anyone enjoy a work where the principle females are not experienced women?

It boggles the mind.

>> No.6780658

When the work in question does not require a chaste virgin in order to advance the plot

>> No.6780660
File: 113 KB, 375x500, time.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780660

Why do you shitpost, /a/?

2D isn´t real.

>> No.6780671
File: 214 KB, 460x500, Panty-and-Stocking-with-Garterbelt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780671

It's real easy.

>> No.6780685

>>6780652
Source of OP pic?

>> No.6780686

>>6780660
lalalalala I can't hear you

>> No.6780689

>>6780660
>2D isn´t real.

Sure is autism in here.

>> No.6780691

>>6780671
But Panty and Stoking was a really bad anime.

>> No.6780693

>>6780671
but that anime wasn't funny at all

>> No.6780721

>>6780652
Because perfection is overrated, and boring.

>> No.6780736
File: 16 KB, 264x333, bill-hicks-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780736

>>6780721
>virgin
>perfection

>> No.6780739

>>6780736
Their definition of perfection.

>> No.6780748

I dunno you guys, I fucking hate when there's the h-scene and suddenly the girl starts going AHHH NO ARHGHHHHH BLOOD EVERYWHERE OH FUCKKKK IT HURTSSSSS. It really grinds my gears.

Then again, when they already had their cherry popped, it feels really bad too.

>> No.6780754

>>6780658
>>6780659
I like both

>> No.6780767
File: 113 KB, 850x949, 15.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780767

>virgin

>> No.6780786

>>6780739
>Their definition of perfection.
Almost everyone's definition of perfect.
It's not a coincidence that almost all cultures all across the world had virgin worship.

>> No.6780884

>>6780786
Primitive people put a high value on getting a virgin because you didn't want to have to take care of some other guys brats, not because virgins were magically delicious.

>> No.6780898
File: 18 KB, 416x353, 1271213243170.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780898

>>6780652
>How can anyone enjoy a work where the principle females are not chaste virgins?

>> No.6780907

>>6780884
It's also something like the idea that you were the first one they loved enough to go that far with, it also lets you confirm that she hasn't been sleeping around with a ton of guys before you as well. Basically first true love + purity.

Or at least that's how I see it.

>> No.6780910

>>6780884
>Primitive people
It was commonly expected that your wife was a virgin up until the 1950s, I'd hardly call my grandfather primitive.

>not because virgins were magically delicious.
It has been proven that virgin women make more loyal wives. So yes, they are "magically" better.

http://www.ncfr.com/pdf/press_releases/PRESS%20RELEAS2.pdf

http://dspace.uta.edu/bitstream/handle/10106/529/umi-uta-1430.pdf;jsessionid=68BDD1BFECBBDFA8A6230F3
BAD8981D7?sequence=1

>> No.6780950

>>6780907
No, that's retarded, people didn't marry out of love.

>> No.6780962

>>6780950
Actually, most people did.
The only ones that didn't were the nobility and the rich.
And even then there are some who married for love, look at queen Victoria and prince Albert.

>> No.6780966

>>6780950
How far primitive are we talking here?

Higher status often had arranged marriages but commoners married for love.

>> No.6780974
File: 74 KB, 640x480, 1269986477213.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6780974

>>6780910
Did someone say.... magic?

>> No.6780989

NTR

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action