[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 145 KB, 850x1220, sample-eb890716a32a558fc8bfa7eadc56f405.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526028 No.6526028 [Reply] [Original]

I don't understand; why are beautiful legs considered fetish material, when just as many men are attracted to them as breasts?

>> No.6526039

I didn't knew beautiful legs were considered fetish material at all, anon.

>> No.6526044

>>6526028
Beautiful thighs are amazing, can't even explain it.

>> No.6526047

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast_fetish

Because breast are considered too, my friend

>> No.6526052

Isn't a fetish anything you get arousal from that isn't inherently sexual? Only by definition.

>> No.6526054

>>6526047
>Feminist bullshit

>> No.6526062

>>6526052
By the medical definition, a fetish is not something non-sexual you find sexy, but rather, anything non-sexual you can't find something sexy WITHOUT.

Medically you only have a foot fetish, for instance, if you can't get off without looking at feet.

>> No.6526067

I'm more aghast that liking tits is considered a fetish. That's like saying breathing can be considered an addiction, or being able to think a mental handicap.

>> No.6526084

It makes sense when you see it from a culture that does not find breasts sexually attractive like primitive tribes. But still doesn't explain why its a fetish considering we coined it and we do find breasts sexually arousing.

>> No.6526092

Breast fetishists base their whole world view around the idea that everyone likes breasts and that it's so normal that it isn't a fetish. Bullshit. It's more obnoxious than the furry persecution complex.

>> No.6526115

It depends on the level of importance you place on the legs.
Fetish is a pretty subjective word in practice and I think you're thinking more about the hips.
Also, shut up. Why the fuck does it matter if it's categorized as a fetish or not? You're just inviting stupid flamewars.

>>6526054

Some men, and I know because I'm one of them, don't care nearly as much about the breasts as other men. I like breasts, yeah, but images that show just the top-half of a woman are so-so and I don't really care for lot of activities that involve the breasts like titty fucking (seriously, I never personally saw the appeal in titty fucking. The activity is something I can take or leave. Not exciting in the least). I'm far more interest in her vagina or legs.. or feet...
I don't even care about the size of them as long as they look good.
Just because it's very, very common doesn't mean it can't be a fetish.
How does this have to do with feminism or do you just like shouting that every time you hear something about gender or sex that you don't agree with?

>> No.6526127

>>6526062
So what do they call sexual attraction to something that isn't inherently sexual? Like feet, legs, or armpits.

>> No.6526136

>>6526115
>hips
I mean thighs and hips...
Alright, fine. It's the legs. Nevermind that part.
Again, it just depends on how much you care about them and how that compares to other people.
It has to be a fixation.

>> No.6526143

>>6526028
>just as many men are attracted to them as breasts
You've been spending too much time on /jp/ bro

>> No.6526170

>>6526028
>>6526047
>>6526127
>>6526062
>>6526054
>>6526052
Is there a medical word for overthinking something really stupid and relying too much on medical definitions and perfect labels instead of just accepting that it can mean different things to different people depending on the context, that none of you are doctors and that those definitions are likely used only by doctors within certain contexts where it might be creating a problem for an individual and/or when some douchebag in a technical field thinks it is a problem?

>> No.6526173

>>6526170
No

>> No.6526229

>>6526173
Sigh... I could've worded that better.
Well, whatever. This thread isn't worth the time and I think I made it worse by trying to explain, so I'll just say this:
Debating about whether something is or is not a fetish only leads to pain and agony.

>> No.6526249

actually leg fetishes are as normal as breast fetishes. High heals exist exclusively to give the aesthetic illusion of longer, more slender and more toned legs.

foot fetishes are where it starts getting abnormal, as far as normal fags are concerned. But even than its not as abnormal as say armpits. I think touhous invented that.

>> No.6526277

>>6526170
>Is there a medical word for overthinking something really stupid and relying too much on medical definitions and perfect labels instead of just accepting that it can mean different things to different people depending on the context

Autism.

>> No.6526288
File: 4 KB, 178x178, 1191270482101.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526288

>>6526277
It's always autism, isn't it?

>> No.6526303

>>6526288

In the context of MMO's, it's called sadism.

I don't think whoever decided on that term knows as much about psychology as they like to believe.

>> No.6526302

>>6526249
Isn't foot fetish the most common one?

>> No.6526327

>>6526249
>I think touhous invented that.
Back when Iron curtain got fucked and TV was all hip and trendy, drunk by freedom and badass enough to show the actual porn here after 2am I once saw a program with a sexology doctor answering questions. He was explaining why people are attracted to armpits and that they actually feel pretty good.
I think I was 14 or so.

>> No.6526335

>>6526327
Go on.

>> No.6526342

>>6526335
I don't actually remember a whole lot of details outside of armpits being all nice and tender or something.
It also weirded me the fuck out as a kid. "Fucking armpits? Really? Eww"
10+ years later I'm on /jp/. Who would have fucking thought

>> No.6526373

Just about everything can be a fetish, even most "normal" things and all not so usual/"normal" things. What is the definition of a fetish? If it's just a turn-on, or something can cause sexual arousal, it can just be anything. Sexual arousal usually results either from physiological reasons or psychological ones (such as emotional memories), and for the latter category, there can be countless such reasons for sexual arousal, thus most people are susceptible to countless "fetishes", I think the word itself mostly loses its meaning - I'd imagine something would be wrong in a sense if someone didn't have any (would such a person be asexual?).

>> No.6526480

>Legs

Awesome.

>Breasts

Awesome

>Thighs

Amazing

>Feet

Pig disgusting unless covered by some kind of sock.

>> No.6526542
File: 1.56 MB, 1500x1059, 1290553362086.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526542

Shikieiki thread?

>> No.6526549

>>6526170
Pedanticism?

>> No.6526592

It doesn't have to be kinky to be a fetish.

>> No.6526597

The whole legs / feet / thighs thing is pretty much a cold climate or conservative demographic phenomena. I.E. people who live in places where there are not man women wearing short shorts or miniskirts and sandals, they tend to have more foot / leg fetishes because they associate those parts of a woman's body with intimate or private situations.

I know this because I moved from a warm place (San Diego) with schools that did not have dress codes (girls in string tops and ultra short shorts) to a place that is cold (Spokane) and has a very christian / conservative demographic (loose jeans and something warm / functional / unattractive on top).

Consequently guys here have a lot more fetishes.

>> No.6526620

>>6526597
I live in FL, my environment hasn't been conservative at all, and I still think feet can be sexy.

>> No.6526801
File: 159 KB, 952x1200, b49b19d34ceae2f6c39705b87edfe55f21ea4502.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526801

Can we turn this into a feet thread instead? Legs are fine too
Also fetishes don't have rational explanations.

>> No.6526817

>>6526801
You can't possibly be agnostic.

>> No.6526820

that picture is so perfect I can't think straight

>> No.6526831
File: 106 KB, 800x600, 1283723324450.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526831

>>6526801

Only if said feet have socks on them.

>> No.6526840

Feet are gross because they look like deformed hands and fingers.

Also foot fetish is stupid because it's usually associated with wanting to smell feet and being stepped on. Legs aren't usually associated with wanting to be crushed between their thighs, nor are breasts usually associated with wanting to smell them.

People do both and rub their dick on both however, but that's when it becomes a fetish. But, while their are abnormal fetishes like breast expansion, I can't think of people who only like feet as part of a person without having one of those strange obsessions with them.

Even in art, you can draw a picture of a girl with big tits or showing off her legs without overemphasizing them but foot lovers always have them up in the foreground and dominating the picture; sometimes they are even drawn with way more intensity than the rest of the image.

The equivalent would be having an image that's 70% a pair of breast taking up the view with veins and the spots on the areola in full detail. And this is every pic primarily about feet.

because foot fetishes are incapable of dissociating their obsession from a purely lewd pov, it's a weird fetish.

>> No.6526848
File: 631 KB, 1440x1440, 1288998133895.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526848

>>6526840
If this is copypasta, it's pretty bad.

>> No.6526858

>>6526831
Socks and stockings are shit tier and relatively new fetishes

>> No.6526864

>>6526840
Most stupid shit I've ever read

>> No.6526870
File: 52 KB, 249x238, 1287720270560.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526870

>>6526840

>> No.6526876
File: 159 KB, 762x1076, 13120109.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526876

>>6526858
You are shit tier.

>> No.6526878

>>6526876
Oh wow you actually liked that anime?

>> No.6526887

>>6526878
I liked it for what it was: a complete timesink with humor that is forgotten in under a day. I don't regret watching it, though. It was what it was.

Also, I read the 4koma manga first. The anime was worth watching for Hata, too.

>> No.6526888
File: 17 KB, 241x230, wow.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526888

>>6526858
>relatively new
You're joking right

>> No.6526892

>>6526888
How old do you think the stocking fetish is?

>> No.6526895

>>6526892
Since stockings were invented.

>> No.6526897

Just be glad you don't have a hair fetish.

>> No.6526899
File: 71 KB, 352x240, 1275069659403.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526899

>and the spots on the areola in full detail.

By recent memory, the artist that tends to do this also draws the rest of the body in similar delicious detail.

>> No.6526901
File: 168 KB, 613x880, 9c8aee915f88d0de733194fa79539f92.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526901

>> No.6526906

>>6526801
> Also fetishes don't have rational explanations.
They have physical (and thus rational) explanations, just as any thought process. My understanding of the term is that it's some charactertistic that can cause sexual arousal in an individual, in which case, the reasons for this can be all knids of early (and later) emotional memories throughout the life of the adult, or other indirect consequences of the thought process. Such memories may not even be something "complete", in the sense that the complete memory may not even exist in full, however I tend to find that I can actually trace back most of my "fetishes" to memories or a combination of them which crystallized into more specific thought patterns as time passed, or even offer pretty rational explanations for why things are like this and not in a different way. There's of course physiological reasons as well, which is why you're likely to be attracted to the opposite gender (instead of the same), at least unless you have some horomonal disbalances (with genetic or environmental causes), and why you're not attracted to beings too different from you (such as animals from different species, oh wait, you have some people like that too...). Wether the fetish is an emergent property which was caused by some genetic trait or from some emotional memories, or even some more complex factor, it usually has an explanation, even if actually finding the true reasons could be a difficult problem (which could be undertaken by better exploring your mind and memories, and through actual scientific study of your own genetics and through the study of your own brain).

>> No.6526905

>>6526895
Then explain why hentai didn't use stockings much until the last 7-8 years or so.
It used to all be barefoot

>> No.6526907

>>6526897
Tsuruya gave me that.

>> No.6526910

>>6526906
They have no physical explanations.
Why do people like breasts? Because they are commonly hidden in public?
Same could be said for foot fetishes. Open toed footware wasn't that common until recently in the west anyway.

>> No.6526911

>>6526840
Sounds about right

>> No.6526918 [SPOILER] 
File: 571 KB, 1035x1461, 20c73143c6488b82df9a05784c04d83f35ecc9ab.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6526918

>>6526899
Satoshi something or other, right?

>> No.6526932

>>6526597
My leg fetish developed via Singing in the Rain or some similar classic movie when I was a kid. My mother told me some actress's legs were insured for like $1 mil each, so I started placing a kind of importance on female legs from that point on.

>> No.6526935

>>6526905
I'm pretty sure the stocking fetish dates back to Victorian England.

>> No.6526941

>>6526887
Except that you're not allowed to like it for any reason

>> No.6526966

>>6526840

realistically, hands are probably more "gross" than feet are

>> No.6526971

>>6526910
I think most "common" sexual parts like breasts and hips are just related to the natural impulse of procreation and looking for an appropiate childbearer.
Big breasts = good feeding capabilities
Big hips = good for child bearing

The fetishes are the ones that aren't relevant to procreation directly.

>> No.6526975

Like getting tied up or stockings?

>> No.6526981

>>6526971
What people liking ass...

>> No.6526994

>>6526910
Are you making the claim that "liking breats" has a non-physical explanation neyond the material universe? Do you think your behaviour and thoughts are disconnected from your brain and that such thought processes couldn't be traced if one were to investigate the individuals?

You see breasts of particular form, after which various invariant representations of breasts and their shapes light up in your IT region of the brain, which itself would trigger some memories (for example, in your amygdala) which leads to the release of hormones and neurotransmitters which in turn will affect your brain and the rest of your body (for example, you may get a boner, among with activation of various sexual organs) - of course, like most processes in the mind this happens in a loop, which give rise to other phenomena and so on. Wether you liking breasts or something else is due to genetic reasons (evolution to favor females capable of taking care of their babies) or due to some emotional imprinting from puberty or whatever may very well be the underlying reason, however I'd imagine that reasons differ from individual to individual. I probably have a light breast fetish: I like DFC to mid-sized and sometimes even larger, however "just breasts" is hardly a turn-on for me, it's more about the shape and how well they fit in general within the body. I imagine my "breast fetish" would be very different from someone who just unconditionally likes large breasts of any kind, and so on. I don't even think that people who share one fetish even do share that SAME fetish, they share it within some range which is determined by complex though processes, which themselves are influenced directly through memories and indirectly through genetics.

>> No.6527008

>>6526981
I guess it's more or less related to hips. Most girls that have nice asses have average or above average hips.

>> No.6527016

>>6527008
Bullshit.
The reason is because they aren't typically seen in public. It's arousing because we don't see it on every woman.
Breasts, ass, and pussy are the two three ones because even when wearing a bikini they are hidden.

>> No.6527048

>>6527016
People can have different fetishes for entirely different reasons and in different forms. The childbearing argument may mean that we may be somehow genetically predisposed to developing such fetishes, maybe even, for all the wrong reasons, but who cares, as long as the results (further propagation) are good. It may also be of interest to realize how we humans managed to breed ourselves into our current form (shape of the face, less body hair, etc), however I leave that to you to read the research, you may find surprising things.

>> No.6527071

>>6526966
How many times a day do you wash you hands? how many times a day do you wash your feet? What's more likely to get sweaty and have bacteria buildup?

>> No.6527076

>>6527071
You are an idiot.
You're feet are 10 times more clean than your hands.
Your hands are the dirtiest part of your body

>> No.6527088
File: 913 KB, 777x1087, 57cfd587e8dbce9700461dd64e26b385.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6527088

>> No.6527089

>>6527076
nope.

Maybe your hands are. Not mine. But then I walk around barefoot whenever possible and constantly wash my hands and try not to touch a lot of things.

My ass is most likely the dirtiest part of my body though. It's where I poop from after all. Go like your filthy feet somewhere else.

>> No.6527094

>>6527071
I don't know about you, but my feet aren't constantly touching bacteria filled places (handles and all that).

Sure, sweat will generate bacteria, but you wash your hands more often because they are constantly in contact with dirty places.

>> No.6527095

>>6527089
No. Everyone's hands are the dirtiest part of their body.
You touch everything with your hands so it's constantly sweeping up bacteria.
Your feet are protected in socks and shoes. Even if they get a little sweaty they will always be cleaner than hands.
A desk is a thousand times dirtier than a toilet seat.
Stop pretending to understand biology or fetishes.

>> No.6527100
File: 444 KB, 1000x1000, 3c27b9c80d62d18a894815621f379515.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6527100

>> No.6527107

>>6527094
>Bacteria buildup
Failing to see the problem, captain. Preface that with "harmful bacteria" instead, then prove the harm, and maybe I might believe you weren't totally full of shit.

>> No.6527113

>>6527089
>My ass is most likely the dirtiest part of my body though. It's where I poop from after all.
The ignorance is astounding

Also most people don't walk around barefoot

>> No.6529185
File: 302 KB, 1222x1753, 45762.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6529185

>>6526918
Urushihara. He knows how to draw fucking sexy.

>> No.6530744
File: 273 KB, 550x642, 969af303c0a193000fccdfbdd60ed995.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6530744

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action