[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/jp/ - Otaku Culture


View post   

File: 321 KB, 1039x1039, 1264798262473.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6521268 No.6521268 [Reply] [Original]

Why do people think that any criticism against them or their threads is automatically because it's not /jp/-related? Why is it that they respond to that criticism as "trolling" and then ignore them and continue doing the same exact thing?

It probably sounds ironic, but when did /jp/ get so self-centered and childish?

>> No.6521270

Troll thread reported

>> No.6521273

Maybe you should provide examples you shit troll

>> No.6521275

0/10, better luck next time.

>> No.6521281

>but when did /jp/ get so self-centered and childish?
when /a/ was divided because of touhou raids

>> No.6521283

newfag influx led to paranoia
we're trying to mantain an imaginary status quo that was actually ruined long ago, making it worse
I prefer asspain and >>>board to having /jp/ overrun by reaction faces, mfw, etc
lesser evil is still evil, but lesser

>> No.6521286

I think you're just overreacting, OP.

>> No.6521301

Because just calling people by names is not a constructive criticism.

>> No.6521307

>>6521283
It never existed and pretty much just reflected the entire site at the time, but there was at least a jaded sense of community, rather than having the board be split in many numerous sub-factions, and the only overlap is in social threads.

>> No.6521311

When Meido went to sleep and shitty metathreads stopped being deleted.

>> No.6521312

>>6521301
Faggot opinion

>> No.6521322

>>6521312
I rest my case.

>> No.6521322,1 [INTERNAL] 

Every board on 4chan is essentially the same as each other.

>> No.6521322,2 [INTERNAL] 

>>6521322,1
So /jp/ can't get any better while we still have /new/ and /b/?

>> No.6521322,3 [INTERNAL] 

>>6521322,2
They're all just overlapping userbases anyway.

>> No.6521322,4 [INTERNAL] 

Can you post that OP pic again please.

>> No.6521322,5 [INTERNAL] 

>>6521322,4
But... I'm the one who got it from you back when we used to argue at AT threads first emerging.

>>
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action