>mfw when if no one would have spammed satorin's thread, there would only be one shit thread. >now there are 6 and counting >thanks for saving /jp/ spammers!

File: 39 KB, 469x428, trollface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:11:01 2010 No.6476223 [Reply] [Original]

>mfw when if no one would have spammed satorin's thread, there would only be one shit thread.
>now there are 6 and counting
>thanks for saving /jp/ spammers!

Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:11:01 2010 No.6476229

Attention 4chan!

I recently came upon 4chan when a friend recommended I visit the sites for a few laughs. I figured "What the hell? I could use some laughs." I must say that when I came on I was disgusted and not amused at all. Why you ask? Because everything on this entire site is literally shit! I mean yes there is funny pictures posted every now and then. But honestly; Do any of you little shits have a life? I mean are you so immature and unintelligant that you find things like cartoon porn and random naked UNDERAGE children funny?

GROW UP! Grow up 4chan. You all seriously need a reality check, You could be doing so many things in the day, yet you all choose to sit around on your fucking fat ugly asses and post pictures and then make sarcastic or idiotic comments like "tits or gtfo" "o rly?" and "Manchester united!".

Get off your fat asses and do something better with your life. I mean all of you obviously have no life or a social life either for that matter. Why? Because your so immature and your the very reason why Mother's go through Depression during pregnancy; and the supposed "girls" that come on here and converse with you are just as much losers are you, they are either fatter then fatty-tan or a term you'd better understand as "A trap".

Well I've put in my two cents, and on a last note, I hope you all one day realize just how much of a loser you are, and honestly kill yourself. I could care less if every single one of you got testicular cancer including the girls and then died naked fat and ugly with a pile of shit and pee oozing from your bowels that excavated due to your death. Grow up Assholes!

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:12:01 2010 No.6476234 GREEN THREAD Also my face when satorin and the other faggots should do that outside of the board so we ALL get the happy ending of not even a SINGLE thread like that.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:12:01 2010 No.6476239 File: 25 KB, 500x281, 1289575125226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >mfw when

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:13:01 2010 No.6476243 Why is Satori so fucking autistic. He should stay on /a/, fucking retard doesn't realize we don't want him here.

Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:13:01 2010 No.6476247

I'll go on record and declare Gurren-Lagann as anything but mindless, completely incomparable to Code Geass or the like. The show is that of a strong opinion, one carried by an unflinching speech. The delivery of a multi-layered meaningful assertion is the ultimate objective, a carefully calculated achievement towards an "altered state of mind".
The narrative strips a media swallowed down by purposeless plot convulsion from unnecessary fluff and successfully intertwines in a concrete shape of unyielding palpability what is commonly recognized as separate: argument, theme and symbolism take a single. From the depths of nostalgia the forgotten but powerful voice of honest beliefs surfaces within a technique of representation built over naked, yet fundamental, ideas. In more than one way this essential notion behind the storytelling is deliberately old-fashioned yet actively forward-looking.

Stagnation, mindless progress and the very nature of human "evolution"; with a manifest yet subtle use of imagery such an abstraction becomes core for the script. They're amazingly broad, basically limitless, yet due to their handling tangible enough to be substantial. Textually knitted into the actual writing without even resorting to term dropping; eloquently described through a seamless combination of visuals, dialogs and raw feelings.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:14:01 2010 No.6476254 >>6476229 >could care less Man, I hate that.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:16:01 2010 No.6476269 >>6476243 >we Speak for yourself, you are not the collective voice of /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:18:01 2010 No.6476283 >>6476234 Too late, it's fucked.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:20:01 2010 No.6476298 >>6476269 me, the spammer, some tripfriends, and even the maid deletes his shitty threads but he's too fucking autistic to understand those threads are not wanted here

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:22:01 2010 No.6476310 Why don't people like Satorin's threads anyway?

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:23:01 2010 No.6476321 >>6476298 You're a retard, spammers by default are retards, /jp/'s tripfriend club are long confirmed Downs kids, and meido is a jerkoff. So collectively you all have the shittiest possible opinions.

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:24:01 2010 No.6476326 >>6476298 You know, my threads used to be fairly well liked and the spammers didn't feel the need to waste their time to show off all their hate for me. Just as long as no one brings up IRC...that was ages ago.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:26:01 2010 No.6476333 >>6476326 You know your threads are OFF TOPIC and shouldn't be here. You make on topic threads and even people who claim to hate you like Suigin post in a good way. But you can't live without jacking off daily to making shitty blog threads.

Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:26:01 2010 No.6476336

>>6476326
JUST MAKE YOUR FUCKING FAGGOT CHANNEL AND AGAIN AND BLOG ALL YOU WANT THERE FOR FUCK SAKE.

TAKE THIS SHIT OUT OF THE BOARD, 5 PEOPLE ENJOYING YOUR CRAP IS NOT ENOUGH TO MAKE FUCKING THREADS THAT BREAK FUCKING RULES, JESUS CHRIST WHY YOU INSIST ON BREAKING RULES?! WHY THE FUCK YOU INSIST ON BREAKING THE FUCKING RULES?!?!

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:28:01 2010 No.6476346 >>6476326 Threads like yours have existed for ages. Fuck, Anonymous of Jacksonville's daily threads used to be considered among of the best threads on /a/ for a while. That was only about a year ago.

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:29:01 2010 No.6476354 >>6476336 I don't normally say this but... U MAD?

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:30:01 2010 No.6476360 >>6476336 Or, anonymous, you could hide the offending thread and move on with your day. If you or the spammer or whatever had done that from the start, there wouldn't be this whole shitstorm in the first place.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:30:01 2010 No.6476362 >>6476354 YES, I FUCKING MAD.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:31:01 2010 No.6476369 >>6476354 Autism at it's best

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:32:01 2010 No.6476382 >>6476360 No, anon. We already have /b/ for threads that don't follow rules. I'm not going to ignore this shit and you can fuck yourself.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:39:01 2010 No.6476436 >>6476382 Then you're an idiot. Ragging and spamming is not going to get rid of Satorin, it's just going to shit up /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:39:01 2010 No.6476442 >>6476436 much like your posts

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:40:01 2010 No.6476445 >>6476442 >Somebody else is shitting up /jp/. >He looks like he needs help.

Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:40:01 2010 No.6476447
File: 188 KB, 1000x933, 87c5a4942bf42135ad0593691c727c59.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6476436
You should listen to this post, it's right.

I probably would have already went to bed by now if my thread just died down on its own.

But nooooooo, can't let that happen right?

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:40:01 2010 No.6476448 >>6476442 Captcha ate my sage. Sorry.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:41:01 2010 No.6476455 >>6476447 You just confirmed the point of people who hate you, congratulations.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:42:01 2010 No.6476457 >>6476447 Don't be rude. It defeats the purpose of whatever you're trying to achieve. Self-aggrandizement is the worst trait any tripfag can have. I made a couple new OPs before flood control ate my face.

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:44:01 2010 No.6476467 File: 836 KB, 978x1200, One of my favorites.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476457 But...but /jp/ is being especially mean to me today... I'm sorry...

>>	deleted !t6J79s1XL6 Fri Nov 19 23:45:01 2010 No.6476470 >>6476467 Referrals, Sato. REFERRALS.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:45:01 2010 No.6476471 >>6476467 So you just answer to hate with more hate? That won't get you anywhere.

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:47:01 2010 No.6476492 File: 200 KB, 718x1000, sample-49d9ea25f2fb95f790bfa3463cadbf96.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476471 But.... Sigh, maybe I should just go to bed and hope that daytime /jp/ is in a bit of a better mood for love. I hope...

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:48:01 2010 No.6476496 File: 4 KB, 113x150, 1246722092257.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >mfw I just filter all this shit. also, get out of jp.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:48:01 2010 No.6476502 >>6476492 I'll do my best to get you banned

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:49:01 2010 No.6476505 >>6476492 Please don't come back. Your presence only makes the board worse.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:49:01 2010 No.6476508 >>6476492 I'm always here, you should know this by now. Also, whatever happened to http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/S6187469#p6187516? You were supposed to stop making these shitty threads you shitposter.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:49:01 2010 No.6476510 >>6476492 You still have a few more hours before the west coast goes to bed and we enter late night/Australian /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:49:01 2010 No.6476513 >>6476492 Good night, Satorin. Have pleasant dreams. See you tomorrow!

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:51:01 2010 No.6476519 >>6476310 Still want an answer on this.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:51:01 2010 No.6476525 File: 78 KB, 444x562, 094ef7f55ae7c832ca8c565b43d91be57906996e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Don't worry Satorin, there's still people in /jp/ who doesn't hate you!

>>	deleted !t6J79s1XL6 Fri Nov 19 23:51:01 2010 No.6476528 Mixed feelings. Not good.

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:51:01 2010 No.6476530 >>6476508 I said only if I got (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) would I agree to that. >>6476513 Thanks~ At least my/a/ thread has been meet with only minimal spam.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:52:01 2010 No.6476532 >>6476519 New /jp/ lurkers need to prove their worth by being as meta as possible.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:52:01 2010 No.6476533 >>6476492 Don't let them get you down, Satorin. G'night.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:52:01 2010 No.6476535 >>6476530 >/a/ thread has been meet with only minimal spam. It's almost like you want to go out of your way to make people who don't really mind either way actively dislike you.

Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:53:01 2010 No.6476540

>>6476519
Because it's blog. Unrelated stuff that no ones care.

Being the observer of someone else's life and saying some trivial shit like "oh that must be hard, cheer up !" it's retarded and should be far away from here.

There are countless other ways of making that kind of shit, but not on /jp/. Also breaking rules about blogging in the image board.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:53:01 2010 No.6476542 >>6476532 ...wanna run that by me again?

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Fri Nov 19 23:54:01 2010 No.6476550 >>6476533 >>6476525 Ah~ Thanks for not being haters~

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:55:01 2010 No.6476553 >>6476532 >Durr durr new lurkers. Yeah keep telling yourself that, son.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:55:01 2010 No.6476557 >>6476540 There are no such rules. How you think 4chan should be and how it actually is are two different things. There are, however, rules prohibiting spamming.

>>	deleted !t6J79s1XL6 Fri Nov 19 23:56:01 2010 No.6476559 You'll be fine, Sato. Have a good night's rest.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:56:01 2010 No.6476560 >>6476540 >Because it's blog. Unrelated stuff that no ones care. Clearly, quite a few people do. So Satorin doesn't belong here. And spam does?

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:57:01 2010 No.6476564 Satorin shitposting on /a/ >>>/a/42636295

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:57:01 2010 No.6476566 >>6476557 See >>6476508 AND http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/S360493 Please stop showing how new you are. Blog threads have been against the rules on /jp/ since forever.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:58:01 2010 No.6476576 I didn't know you asked how was someone else's day in a blog. I thought a blog was all about yourself, Satorin threads doesn't sound like that.

>>	deleted !t6J79s1XL6 Fri Nov 19 23:59:01 2010 No.6476578 >>6476564 Shitposting? The responses are better then the crap being spewed by everyone else.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:59:01 2010 No.6476581 >>6476564 Your autism is showing.

Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:59:01 2010 No.6476582

>>6476557
Hahaha good luck thinking that blooging is allowed on 4chan. Keep making threads the threads when a mod is around and see what happens. After deleting your shit several times you ban finally arrives.

>>6476560
You mean like 5 people at best? Followed by additional samefaggotry? Sorry but that your shit to a IRC channel, forum or whatever.

>>	Anonymous Fri Nov 19 23:59:01 2010 No.6476583 Satorin defense force is strong in this thread. Good job samefag.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:00:01 2010 No.6476585 >>6476576 DING! That works.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:00:01 2010 No.6476586 >>6476581 Why?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:00:01 2010 No.6476588 >>6476576 I've been wondering that myself.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:00:01 2010 No.6476593 >>6476566 Your point is invalid. That was a direct response to how ronrey threads had seemingly taken over /jp/. You now seem them far less often.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:01:01 2010 No.6476597 >>6476583 Christ, anonymous, are you going to fix that samefag detector, or do I need to get a trip or something? I really, REALLY don't want to get a trip.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:02:01 2010 No.6476601

>>6476576
His threads are against the rules because he's asking people to blog about their lives, even if he doesn't actively talk about his. It's like if I posted a thread saying "post cp in this thread".

Anyway, why are you even arguing this? His threads always get deleted when the meido is around and you can see this by looking at the archive. Shut the fuck up.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:04:01 2010 No.6476611 >>6476582 >samefaggotry You just love that word, don't you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:04:01 2010 No.6476612 File: 58 KB, 450x600, 384bc3b3366a04be63128b3b046b13c10c886a47.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476601 How rude... Why won't you take it easy?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:04:01 2010 No.6476617 >>6476593 ... The sticky was made during the GM shitstorm about his CYOAs. The end was just tacked on because it's also against the rules. We had no huge amount of ronery threads during that time. No blogging is no blogging. Go away.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:05:01 2010 No.6476619

>>6476576
>How was your day?
Oh it was shitty because of X and Y / good because of W and Z.
>Oh how nice~

>How was your day?
X happened, bla bla bla
>Oh what a shame, bla bla bla, what are you going to do?
This and that.

Yeah, no. Take this crap out of here, no one cares about your fucking life.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:05:01 2010 No.6476627 >>6476601 Satorin's threads getting deleted I'm fine with. I'm NOT fine with the whole shitstorm that people stir up around them.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:06:01 2010 No.6476631 >>6476612 >I don't have arguments against it so I'll just use the "take it easy xD" crap that never existed in the first place around here.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:07:01 2010 No.6476641 >>6476627 There wouldn't be any shitstorms if there wasn't threads to being with. Eliminate the ROOT of the problem.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:07:01 2010 No.6476642

>>6476601
4chan is not only explicitly against global rules, it's actually illegal for moot to allow people to leave it there. The prohibition on blogging, on the other hand, stems from one post in Japan/General over two years ago by a single moderator who isn't even around anymore. Hardly the same.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:08:01 2010 No.6476647 >>6476642 CP, not 4chan.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:08:01 2010 No.6476648 File: 44 KB, 256x192, 4324234234.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476631 At last you have uncovered your true identity, /a/ friend.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:09:01 2010 No.6476655

>>6476617

You are quite wrong. /jp/ was flooded with fake incest stories, ronrey threads, and suchlike (hence the "sister masturbating" addendum at the end).

As you'll notice in the archive, many /jp/ posters voiced their utter indifference to such threads.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:09:01 2010 No.6476656 >>6476617 >his I mean ``her''. >>6476642 Holy shit what is so hard to understand? These kinds of threads always get deleted when the meido is around: IT'S STILL AGAINST THE RULES.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:10:01 2010 No.6476661 >>6476631 Let me clarify this so I won't get laughed upon: I'm not trying to use that stupid meme "u mad", but you really seem to be taking this far too seriously, I can even say you seem angry.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:11:01 2010 No.6476665

>>6476648
Hahahahahah I only browse /jp/ and left /a/ behind 2 years ago. That's exactly the reason I care about this shit, because it's the only board I browse, thus I'll whine about every single problem around here.

Nice arguments again by the way, man. Please try a little harder than just saying people are from /a/ or /v/ or whatever or saying they are not taking it easy.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:11:01 2010 No.6476671

>>6476656
I wasn't aware that meido's word was god and that everybody had to get behind everything he did. I personally think that there is a class of threads whose existence in /jp/ is tolerable but should be pruned now and then anyway.

>IT'S STILL AGAINST THE RULES.
So is loli.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:11:01 2010 No.6476672 >>6476641 This is true. But what are you going to do about it? Got some plan to uproot said root? Because the current method is doing far more damage to /jp/ than off-topic threads.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:13:01 2010 No.6476687 File: 28 KB, 256x192, 4534534534.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476665 You keep proving my point, only an /a/ friend would respond like that to an accusation. Either that, or you really never understood /jp/.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:15:01 2010 No.6476692 >>6476672 I'm not the one spamming so don't blame me. >>6476661 I really AM a bit angry, anon.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:16:01 2010 No.6476703

>>6476671
What the hell is your point? Yes, loli is against the rules, and yes, it should also be deleted. Make some kind of argument or something.

>>6476672
Spammer here, I've been spamming Satorin's threads for months now, I always kill his threads. It's the first time a shitstorm like this happened, mostly due to the autism of that one guy who kept reposting threads.

I disagree on the fact that it causes more damage to /jp/ than the off-topic threads, the only damage is being caused by Satorin who can't handle that his threads aren't welcomed here. A ban would solve everything.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:16:01 2010 No.6476706 >>6476692 Well these anons clearly don't share your feeling, they are probably laughing at you right now, so I don't get what's the point of getting angry at all.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:16:01 2010 No.6476707 >>6476687 Ok anon, I'll just pretend that you stopped posting if you can't come up with anything valid.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:17:01 2010 No.6476711 >>6476692 Fair enough. Spam-anon is probably somewhere around here, though.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:18:01 2010 No.6476716 >>6476706 They can laugh all they want. If they can't come back with a decent argument then it's fine since I know that they are merely irrelevant shitposters.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:18:01 2010 No.6476719 >>6476703 To be honest, I've rarely seen his threads spammed.

>>	Satorin !KOMEijI/Jg Sat Nov 20 00:19:01 2010 No.6476724 >>6476703 I'm still waiting for the dere dere.... You have been quite good at catching most of my threads to, I am glad you haven't let me down.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:20:01 2010 No.6476728 >>6476716 You didn't respond to my argument. I will soon be forced to conclude that you are a shitposter.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:20:01 2010 No.6476730 >>6476716 No, you're not getting my point. They laugh, they have a great time, and you get angry. Who do you think wins in this case? I can only say it's not you for sure.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:22:01 2010 No.6476733 File: 131 KB, 450x450, jason-vorhees-9-stylised-action-figure-1302-p.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] The fucks everyone so angry for? Y'all niggas needa chill

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:22:01 2010 No.6476734

>>6476728
I'll make it easier for you to understand then: I get angry naturally, it's not like I can control it. And it doesn't matter if I'm angry or not, I still keep going with a discussion instead of using lame excuses and "escapes" like that did in the first place.

>>6476724
Why are you still here, go to sleep at once.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:22:01 2010 No.6476735 File: 102 KB, 583x500, b0bf4c7eb1f6239d5f3393d9100f4b15e6457dbc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476724 Oh Sato you're still here! I must say I like you, just because you seem to be taking it easy.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:22:14 2010 No.6476738 >>6476703 Should be ban Hong Meiling because he regularly breaks the rules by posting or linking to loli?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:23:01 2010 No.6476743 >>6476703 Should we ban Hong Meiling because he regularly breaks the rules by posting or linking to loli?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:23:01 2010 No.6476744 >>6476730 They have a good time while I also have a good time because they end up without arguments and thus "defeated". Resorting to the "lol u mad hue hue hue" thing. So like I said earlier: It doesn't matter.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:24:01 2010 No.6476753 >>6476735 Sup deleted, I see you are posting as anon here huh.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:24:01 2010 No.6476754 >>6476744 The only person who considers them defeated is you, but if that makes you feel better inside, more power to you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:26:01 2010 No.6476765 >>6476753 Nah, I'm not deleted, but you think only circlejerks (or whatever you call them) are allowed to have friendly conversation?

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:26:01 2010 No.6476766

>>6476743
Linking to it isn't against the rules and he's been spoilering his NSFW images for a while. He did get banned tons of times before for the non-spoilered NSFW posting and I have always approved of those bans.

Again, make some kind of argument.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:26:01 2010 No.6476770 >>6476754 And then again: In the end it doesn't matter, anon. It doesn't matter at all. It doesn't matter if they are happy or depressed, angry or happy, etc. My point remains solid there while their in the other hand, not.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:27:01 2010 No.6476775 >Meta faggotry >93 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view. Never change, /jp/. I don't think we've had this kind of thread this month. It's good to know that we're getting our monthly dose.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:27:01 2010 No.6476776 >>6476766 Spoilered loli and linking to loli is also against global rule one, per moot's declaration. Should he be banned as he is currently posting?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:28:01 2010 No.6476783 >>6476770 You're essentially declaring yourself the victor of the argument because "I'm right and they're not," but so long as you're aware of what you're doing I suppose that's fine.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:29:01 2010 No.6476784 File: 14 KB, 350x275, jason_vorhees-1268930090..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] This thread sucks. Why are you guys so serious? Take it easy, bros. I'm almost embarrassed for you.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:29:01 2010 No.6476788 >>6476775 >monthly dose. This happens almost daily.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:29:01 2010 No.6476791 >>6476775 You don't lurk much do you? We have threads like this at least twice a week.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:30:01 2010 No.6476796
File: 86 KB, 1024x768, 1284520765154.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6476770

But the thing is, they have no point, because you are not discussing with anyone!

All you are doing is talking to yourself, while there is an audience out there laughing at your futile efforts to comprehend your adversary. While in reality that so called "enemy" is just a ghost you created to satisfy your own delusions.

But then again, living in delusions is what /jp/ does best.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:30:01 2010 No.6476803

>>6476766

You enjoy picking and choosing rules, don't you? NSFW images, with a spoiler or not, are against the rules. Period. In addition to it being part of the global rules, moot and the mods have confirmed this numerous times.

Also, you seem to know with certainty when a user gets banned. How do you come about such information?

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:32:01 2010 No.6476816

>>6476703
>It's the first time a shitstorm like this happened
I'll agree that this one was/is bigger than most, but smaller shitstorms HAVE started over this.

Satorin's threads hurt /jp/ because of what you and yours bring to them and too the rest of /jp/. You spamming is not going to stop Satorin from making new threads; it never has and it never will. All you're doing is starting shit. Yeah, Satorin leaves after a while, but in the threads that remain mostly unharassed, Satorin leaves after about the same while. The difference is that when Satorin leaves due to spam, there's still two factions of anons hurling shit at each other in his wake.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:33:01 2010 No.6476821 >>6476788 >>6476791 Yes, but usually they are not the result of a single person's faggotry. Such things occur on a rarer basis.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:33:01 2010 No.6476826

>>6476803
Moderators have confirmed that spoilered NSFW images are fine, I can go grab the post from the archive if you really want me to.

Anyway, that's not the point, I really don't care if Meiling gets banned. I don't care enough to make a shitstorm about it because he does something that actually improves the board but I really wouldn't care if he got permabanned tomorrow for breaking the rules.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:33:01 2010 No.6476827
File: 617 KB, 849x1202, sample_4c07617e8668ab4788dcc7f2b2b52a7fb66eb1f3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6476784

There is just one anon being serious, we are all trying to make him understand the internet is for taking it easy.

Specially /jp/

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:35:01 2010 No.6476837

>>6476783
>You're essentially declaring yourself the victor of the argument because "I'm right and they're not,"

Hm? How come? That person used a "you don't take easy" line and I answered it then said person proceeded to say I don't have a point while not even making a argument on his own.

>>6476796
How can I be talking to myself when one person kept telling me that I had not point when I actually had (saying that /jp/ never took it easy for example) and I was just replying to that person asking for arguments while said person kept avoiding it because he was unable of such a thing?

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:36:01 2010 No.6476846

>>6476816
Actually, you are wrong. No shitstorm on the board has ever happened before as a result of my spamming and I only stop spamming when everyone has stopped posting, so there never is a "war" in those threads. I can link all of them here if you really want to see for yourself.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:36:01 2010 No.6476848

>>6476826
You're granting a two-year old post by an individual moderator in Japan/General who is no longer around far more weight than an explicit announcement by moot that loli violates global rules. So in the end, really, it came down to your personal preference, didn't it?

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:39:01 2010 No.6476857
File: 75 KB, 680x1024, 1284520501937.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6476837

Exactly, that person is not who you think it is.

That person was just an outburst of laughter the audience created in order to see you struggle, but in actuality, they were not trying to talk to you seriously at all.
You created a character that wanted a brief discussion, in order to delude yourself, thinking that you were actually having a reasonable rebuttal.

In common terms, that is called "trolling".

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:39:01 2010 No.6476858 >>6476826 http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/thread/4762268#p4762652 I know you're referring to this. It is irrelevant. There are plenty of people who posted caps of them getting banned for posting NSFW images within spoiler tags.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:40:01 2010 No.6476864 >>6476857 I don't think you can declare such a thing unless you are that person. And that still doubtful.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:41:01 2010 No.6476874
File: 81 KB, 1024x768, 1284520230178.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6476864

Well I am, but I guess now that you know the unbearable truth, you are going to claim that I wasn't planning it all, and it just occurred to me recently, are you not?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:42:01 2010 No.6476878 >>6476848 see >>6476858 It's a recent post. Anyway, the point is, I'm not a mod or a janitor. I don't mind if Hong gets banned or not but it's not up to me. I don't know why you're bringing this up.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:42:01 2010 No.6476882 Some statements are so self-evidently stupid that nobody bothers to actually argue against them seriously. The fact that nobody bothered to seriously argue against a statement does not mean that it is correct.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:43:01 2010 No.6476883

>>6476846
>No shitstorm on the board has ever happened before as a result of my spamming
Are you blind?

>there never is a "war"
I guess so.

Don't bother linking the threads. You'd only link the ones that support your argument anyway. Although, out of curiosity, did you save all the other threads relating to this topic besides the blog ones?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:44:01 2010 No.6476892 >>6476878 I brought it up to point out that you were being inconsistent; you dislike Sartorin and you don't mind Hong Meiling. I said it plain as day. If you really can't see why I brought it up you are terrible at reading comprehension.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:45:01 2010 No.6476901

>>6476874
Heh it was quite obvious to tell you the truth.

I don't know if I can say that. But what I know is that my arguments remain anyways and I would like to see someone trying to bring them down with arguments of their own. I don't mind being trolled or whatever if no one was able to counter what I said.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:47:01 2010 No.6476902 >>6476882 Conclusion: we may never know if people didn't bothered about it of if they couldn't reply.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:50:01 2010 No.6476913 File: 72 KB, 680x1024, 1284520405339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6476901 I see you have quite a stubborn head. Well I had fun while it lasted, perhaps people taking everything far more seriously than us is what entertain us the most.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:51:01 2010 No.6476915

>>6476883
I said before. It's the first time. If you wanna see the threads I've spammed, go to http://archive.easymodo.net/cgi-board.pl/jp/image/8qdktUt0aAB6ahpYG9idHw and check the ones with sage in the email field, I always start my spamming with this pic + the initial Aikido pasta. As for the rest of the post, I don't know what you're asking.

>>6476892
I'm inconsistent, yes, I don't understand your point though. I'm not gonna spam to death every unrelated thread on the board, I only spam the unrelated threads that don't bring anything to the board that people actually reply to.

You'd have a point if I was a mod and I ignored his threads but deleted Satorin's, but I'm not. Spamming takes a long time so I'm not gonna do it for every unrelated, shitty thread, even though I wish I could.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:53:01 2010 No.6476925 >>6476913 Why stubborn? I'm not repeating myself here, it was just a commentary. You are the one insisting that I shouldn't take things seriously when there is no reason for such.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:55:01 2010 No.6476930

>>6476915
My final point is that you say two different things: "Sartorin needs to be banned because he breaks the rules," and "I don't really mind if Hong Meiling is banned for breaking the rules." Now, it's very obvious that Hong is by and far away a better poster, but what I'm saying is that you need to come up with a better justification than just, "meido deletes it, so it's against the rules, so we need to ban this poster."

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:56:01 2010 No.6476934 As long as you're here, spammer; how do Satorin's threads hurt /jp/? They're probably unrelated, but how do they harm the board?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:57:01 2010 No.6476942 >>6476934 Not the spammer but >unrelated Your answer. Unrelated things shouldn't be here in the first place so yeah, it's like making threads about anime.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:59:01 2010 No.6476949 >>6476942 But you are not the bringer of the law. It's not for you to decide whether something can be here or not. That's the mods and janitor's job, and if they decide to overlook it, you have no right to object.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 00:59:01 2010 No.6476950

>>6476930
>what I'm saying is that you need to come up with a better justification than just, "meido deletes it, so it's against the rules, so we need to ban this poster."
Meido doesn't delete Meiling's threads anymore, though. Posting links to loli isn't against the rules, I'm 99.9% sure, the only thing Meiling does that is against the rules is posting NSFW images and that's arguable, considering his threads stay up and a mod clearly said NSFW pics are fine if they're spoilered.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:03:01 2010 No.6476964

>>6476934
They're unrelated and are full of shitposting.
>>6476949
They aren't overlooking it, though. The threads always get deleted when the janitor is around. I never spam when the janitor is around.

All I'm doing is speeding up the deletion process because I don't want to have to wait for the janitor.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:03:01 2010 No.6476967

>>6476950
>1. Do not upload, post, discuss, request, or link to, anything that violates local or United States law. This will be severely punished and strictly enforced.
Child pornograph and loli are both against United States law. Moot said around November 1 or so in a "ask moot questions" thread that 4chan considers loli to be CP. Therefore, linking to loli is technically against the rules, it's just that moderators and admins don't really care and /jp/ most certainly doesn't care.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:05:01 2010 No.6476979

>>6476964
>They're unrelated and are full of shitposting.
Shitposting is a matter of taste and thus irrelevant, and I know they're unrelated. I'm asking how said unrelatedness hurts /jp/.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to justify it, but I've always wondered about this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:11:15 2010 No.6476979,1 The meido has awakened.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:13:14 2010 No.6476979,2 [INTERNAL]

I hate when this happens. Thread got deleted as I was posting so this goes on the ghostside.

>>6476967
Loli is not against United States law, I don't know where you got that. Anyway, point is, the threads stay up. It's not hypocritical of me in the slightest to not care about Meiling's threads if the moderation staff doesn't.

>>6476979
Why does it have to hurt /jp/ exactly? I don't understand your logic. It's unrelated, it has to go.

>>6476985
It's like the fifth time I say this now, I'm not deciding anything, the threads get deleted even if I do nothing, it's just that it takes a lot longer because the janitor isn't around 24/7. I'm speeding up deletion for a thread that would get deleted anyway, not getting a related thread deleted.

Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:16:01 2010 No.6476979,3 [INTERNAL]

>>6476979,2

And how could you possibly know if the thread is getting deleted or not?
Maybe the janitor would decide to spare it in the future.
Maybe it's you who caused the subject in the thread to change, and that's what led to it's deletion, not the original content.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:18:46 2010 No.6476979,4 Because the threads get deleted even when I do nothing? Because the threads get deleted when I spam instead of just clearing my spam out of the thread? Please, you can't really be arguing this.

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 01:20:31 2010 No.6476979,5 >>6476979,4 It's easier to select one post and delete and entire thread than select every one of your spams and delete them manually. Which one do you think the janitor will choose?

>>	Anonymous Sat Nov 20 07:04:18 2010 No.6476979,6 why didn't these fags just report the spammer on IRC instead of spamming the entire board?

Reply to thread

Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Action

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/jp/ - Otaku Culture